csomt_13

Upload: radu-berinde

Post on 07-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 csomt_13

    1/9

    Strategic Orientation (SOR)

    Strategic Orientation (SOR)

    1. Introduction and concepts

    Strategy development and planning are closely related. Both are concerned with thefuture activities of a project or organisation. Where planning is meant to identify concreteactivities, strategy development is more concerned with the future direction, rather thanwith concrete objectives and activities. A strategy is a translation of the organisationsmission into aims, and provides ideas how these aims could be pursued. As there may bevarious ways, depending on the environment, strategy development provides a choice

    among alternatives. Planning is then the concrete translation of the chosen strategy intoconcrete objectives, activities and related means. Some key differences between planningand strategy development are given in table below:

    Table 1. Some key differences between Planning and Strategy Development

    Strategy development Planning

    Searching direction Concrete (direction is given)

    Innovation (search for new) Rearranging old ideas

  • 8/3/2019 csomt_13

    2/9

    Innovation (search for new) Rearranging old ideas

    Strategic Orientation (SOR)

    Figure 1. Place of SWOT and Strategic Orientation in Strategic Planning

    Mission/

    Objectives

    Environmental

    Scan

    Insitutional

    Setting

    Integrated

    Organisation

    Model

    Opportunies

    & Threats

    Strengths &

    Weaknesses

    Alternative

    Strategies

    Strategic

    Plan

    (Action)

    Planning

    ImplementationMonitoring

    In-depth analysis of

    strategically importantstrengths/

    weaknesses

    Strategic

    Orientation

    SW

    OT

    Strategic Planning:

    from SWOT to Action Plan

    Identification

    Formulation Appraisal

    Financing

    ImplementationEvaluation

  • 8/3/2019 csomt_13

    3/9

    Strategic Orientation (SOR)

    Opportunities for development organisations may exist or arise in the event of:

    gaps in the service/product delivery to the target group (non-existence of certaingoods or services, or non-availability in certain locations);

    favourable trends (increase in incomes, growth of urban population with specificneeds for more sophisticated products;

    weaknesses shown by other development organisations (low quality, high costs); better access to new methodologies/technologies; potential for improved cooperation.

    In relation to target group oriented opportunities the following table can be considered:

    Table 2. Opportunities related to products/services and target groups

    Present products/services New products/services

    present target groups project intensification product/servicedevelopment

    new target groups project replication project diversification

    A threat can be defined as an external fact or development that has or can have a

    substantial negative effect on an organisations performance

  • 8/3/2019 csomt_13

    4/9

    Strategic Orientation (SOR)

    Essential in whether or not to include a factor in the analysis is:

    the relevance of the factor for the performance of the project the probability that the fact/development is or will become true the influence the project has to address the factor

    2.2 Internal analysis

    The internal situation is discussed on the basis of the existing situation and exploresexisting strengths and weaknesses and not future ones. An organisations strengths andweaknesses are an organisations internal critical factors that determine its performance.

    A strength is therefore defined as an internal characteristic that contributes substantiallyto the realisation of the organisations mission. A strength is any existing internal asset(management, staff capacity/motivation, knowledge, resources, business links, etc.) which will

    help to exploit opportunities (or to meet demands) and to fight off threats.

    A weaknessis an internal characteristic that negatively and substantially influences thefunctioning of the organisation. Weaknesses are internal conditions that erode theorganisations position, hamper cooperation with others or obstruct the exploitation ofopportunities.

    To identify strengths and weaknesses systematically, the following tools may be useful:

    IOM (balance between the components (outputs inputs structure systems staff

  • 8/3/2019 csomt_13

    5/9

    Strategic Orientation (SOR)

    1. Define the entity or problem area

    2. Identification of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats

    from internal analysis: strengths and weaknessesexternal analysis: opportunities and threatsbased on joint discussion or brainstorm

    3. Developing strategic options

    For each opportunity and each threat generate concrete strategic options (concreteobjectives/aims) that would make advantage of this opportunity or that would reducethe threat.

    4. Select the 4-5 best options

    Method 1: develop one or more criteria to select the best options and apply the

    criteria to the options. Often criteria will follow from a basic question;Method 2: select the 5 best options using consensus or using voting by participants.

    5. Matching the strategic options with strengths and weaknesses

    Use the Strategic Orientation Matrix. Identify for each of the options which strengthscan be used and which weaknesses should be reduced to be able to realise thisoption.

  • 8/3/2019 csomt_13

    6/9

    Strategic Orientation (SOR)

    Annex 1: Example Strategic Orientation

    ISPA

    Institutional Strengthening of Private Agriculture - Romania

    Step 1. Define Entity / Basic Question

    Basic Question:How can ISPA develop into a financially sustainable farmers' organisation while deliveringsubstantial and relevant services to its members?

    Step 2. Identification of major Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats

    Strengths

    Flexibility to start new (related) activities ISPA has good image

    ISPA offers q alit

  • 8/3/2019 csomt_13

    7/9

    Strategic Orientation (SOR)

    Step 3+4. Develop Strategic Options + select the best options

    Major opportunity/threat Major Strategic Options Effect onsustainability

    High demand for input supplycentres

    Increase sales Input supplycentres/establish new centres

    High

    New/other clients for potatoes andmilk

    Increase purchase & sales ofpotatoes.

    Increase milk collection

    High

    Access to cheese processingexpertise & funds.Monopoly position of LACTIS (dairycompany)

    Establish own milk processing unit High

    Non payment of clients Improve contracts + more strictfollow up

    High

    Still weak relations with farmers.

    Farmers interest in ISPA activities

    Increase membership promotion &

    activities.

    High

    Uncertain access to financeextension activities

    Survey on sources Medium

    Resistance of elephants Use government relations Low

    5. Matching Strategic Options with Strengths and Weaknesses

    Strategic Strategic options

  • 8/3/2019 csomt_13

    8/9

    Strategic Orientation (SOR)

    6. Formulate Tentative Strategies

    1. Increase Membership promotion

    using quality related payment and unique service package while improving planning and monitoring

    2. Expand Potato sales and milk collection

    using ISPAs good image

    and emphasising quality

    while reducing operating costs and improving planning and monitoring

    3. Expand Input supply centres

    using the flexibility to start new activities and ISPA unique service package (to attract customers)

    while reducing operating costs and improving planning and monitoring

  • 8/3/2019 csomt_13

    9/9

    Strategic Orientation (SOR)

    ref:12716.054 - Strategic Orientation (SOR) DI Page 9 (9)

    www.m

    df.nl

    M

    DFcopyrig

    ht2010

    Step 7. Logical Framework for implementation

    InterventionLogic

    Indicators Sources of verification Assumptions

    OverallObjective

    Improved incomeagricultural producers

    Difference between marketprice and ISPA price toAgr. Producers

    ProjectPurpose

    To improve support toagricultural producers

    Purchases from Agr. Prod.

    IntermediateResults

    1. Input supply centresestablished

    2. Potato marketing andmilk collection expanded

    3. Financial positionstrengthened

    4. Membership ofAgricultural Producersstrengthened

    Indicators of results No of centres establishedNo of customers per centreSalesGross resultNet resultReturn on investment

    No of centres establishedNo of customers per centreSalesGross resultNet resultReturn on investment(ROI)

    Net resultNet result econ. activitiesLiquidityROI of economic activitiesExistence of relations withpotential donors.

    No of members.No of locationsNo of members perlocationNumber of services usedby members

    Source of verification

    Activities 1.1 To analyse fin.feasibility input supplycentres

    2.1. Establish new milkcollection centres (5)

    3.1 Organise theaccounting system

    4.1. Improve use ofpayment days forinformation and extension

    1.2 To develop logisticsystem input supplycentres

    2.2. Identify more reliablepartners

    3.2 Improve regularfinancial analysis andplanning and improvemonitoring.

    4.2 Improve information atinput supply centres

    1.3. To develop administr.system input supply

    2.3. Improve delivery andtransport planning

    3.3 Assess reduction ofadministration costs and

    review costs/hour

    4.3 Improve extension andmobilisation capacity

    1.4 2.4 Improve contracts andfollow up on contracts

    3.4 Identify and assessnew economic activities

    4.4 Re-define relationswith other extensionagencies

    1.5 2.5 3.5. Identify financialsources for membersservices

    4.5 Develop relation withcattle breedersorganisation