globalfoodsafety_daneels

8/16/2019 GlobalFoodSafety_Daneels

1/18

CARVER+Shock

Jeffrey J. DanneelsDepartment Manager

Sandia National Laboratories

Albuquerque, NM

Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company,

for the United States Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.


2/18

Mission-Driven Laboratory

• Design and development: nonnuclear portions of US nuclear weapons

• Production: advanced components

• Safety, security, use control• Treaty verification, nonproliferation,counterproliferation

• Advanced military technologies

• Energy and environment• Homeland security, countering weaponsof mass destruction

We serve many agencies of the

US Government with:


3/18

Highly Skilled Workforce

• More than 8,600 full-time employees• More than 1,500 PhDs and 2,700 MS/MAs

• 2,200 on-site contractors• $2.33 billion FY06 total budget

Mechanical Engineering - 16%

Electrical Engineering - 22%

Other Engineering - 15%

Other Science - 6 %

Physics - 6%

Chemistry - 6%

Math - 2%

Computing - 16%Other Fields - 6 %


4/18

Energy, Resources, and Nonproliferation

Energy, Water, and Security Enabled by Science & Technology

• Secure energy supplies for

national security• Clean, abundant and

affordable energy

• Water research• Infrastructure protection


5/18

• Physical security

solutions for DOE andother federal agencies

• Critical infrastructure protection

• Systems analysis forrisk management

Risk Management and Critical Infrastructure Protection

Program


6/18

CARVER+Shock Defined

C – CriticalityPublic health and economic impacts

A – AccessibilityAbility of an attacker to reach a target

R – RecognizabilityEase of identifying a target

V – VulnerabilityAnalyzes the potential success of an attack

E – Effect

Direct loss of productionR – Recuperability

Ability of the system to recover

Shock – Combined health, economic and psychological effects


7/18

CARVER+Shock Functions

•Three main steps

1. Develop a process flow diagram


8/18


•Three main steps

1. Develop a process flow diagram

1. Are vehicles allowed to enter the fenced area?

2. Do you control all access points through fixed guards,limited-rate gates (e.g. revolving gates), or detection-

activated surveillance?

3. How do you control access to the building? (check all that

apply)

4. What kinds of security do you have inside the building

during working hours? (check all that apply)

2. Interview questions


9/18


•Three main steps

1. Develop a process flow diagram2. Interview questions

3. Scoring


10/18

• Identify protection techniques from 5 major chemical/biologicalagent categories

• User friendly and universally understood • Based on CARVER military targeting methodology• Microsoft Windows 98 and newer Microsoft Windows

operating systems

Objectives

• Reduce time and effort required to meet food defense goals

•Prepare food defense software for all food processors

• Bring established security principles to the food industry

Features


11/18

Operational Features

• Potentially over 250 questions

•Over 290 pre-programmed processing steps (icons)

• Ability to define new processing steps• 14 pre-programmed processes• Relative scoring between processing steps• Mitigation text embedded


12/18

Agents

High

Medium

High

Low

Very high

Water

Water & oil

Oil

Water

Water

80

100

100

All temps

All temps

Agent 1

Agent 2

Agent 3

Agent 4

Agent 5

Relative ToxicitySolubility

Max

Temperature

Degree C


13/18

User Session

(Mitigation)

A node is crit ical when introduction of threat

agents into food at this location would have

significantly affect Criticality include produce

traceabili ty and recall pol icies and

procedures.

----------------------------------------------------* Product cannot be traced to distribution

centers and retail outlets. Consider

establishing traceability procedures such as

matching product code dating with

destinations. Accurate traceability will

decrease the potential scope and effect of acontamination event and decrease product

recall time.

* Consider establishing product codes.

Coding should include a process to match

codes with distributions pathways.


14/18

F a c i l i t y

S e c u r i t y

F e

n c e S e

c u r i t y

B u

i l d i n

g S

e c u r i t

y R o o m S e c u r i t y

Total

Security

I c o n S e c u r i t y

R o o m

A w a r e n e s

sI c o

n A w a r e n e s s

F a c i l i t y A w a r e n e

s s

T i m e N e e d e d

T i m e A v a i l a b

l e

Calculation

D i f f i c u l t y

Time

Modifier

M o n i t o r i n g

Awareness

SecurityFacility

Security

D i f f i c u

l t y

M o n i t o

r i n g

T i m e M o

d i f i e r

A w a r e n e s s

E x c e s s T

i m e

j

Facility AnswersBuilding Answers

(if Icon j is within)Fence Answers

(if Icon j is within)

Room Answers

(if Icon j is within)Icon j Answers

Icon

Accessibi li ty jScore

to

Reconizability j

baseAccessibility = TotalSecurity+Monitoring+Awareness

If baseAccessibility < 0 then set to zero

Accessibi li ty = 10–baseAccessibi li ty–Difficulty–TimeModif ier

Algorithm Structure

(Accessibility only as example)


15/18

Feed Mill Comparison

(Software vs. Live Session)

30 35 40 45 50 55 60

28

2624

22

20

18

16

14

12

10

Software Total

F t . D o d g e R e s u l t s y = 0.4539xR2 = 0.6974


16/18

Issues and Needs

• Testing and calibration must continue

• Food processing jargon and better equipment understanding• User uncertainty and chief concerns• Conservative assumptions must be confirmed

• User session improvements necessary for continued use


17/18

• V2.0 will include retail and pre-harvest modules• Calibration and validation will be ongoing• Updates will be well communicated and distributed

Next Steps

Conclusions

• Value to food industry in time/labor/product savings

• Consumer value in safer food supply• Improved homeland security


18/18

globalfoodsafety_daneels

Documents