schizophr bull 2012 kishimoto schbul sbs150

Upload: vinodksahu

Post on 02-Jun-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Schizophr Bull 2012 Kishimoto Schbul Sbs150

    1/22

    Page 1 of 22

    Schizophrenia Bulletin

    doi:10.1093/schbul/sbs150

    The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved.For permissions, please email: [email protected]

    Long-Acting Injectable vs Oral Antipsychotics for Relapse Prevention inSchizophrenia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

    Taishiro Kishimoto1,2, Alfred Robenzadeh1, Claudia Leucht3, Stefan Leucht3, Koichiro Watanabe2,4, Masaru Mimura2,Michael Borenstein5, John M. Kane1,6,7,8, and Christoph U. Correll*,1,6,7,8

    1The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, North Shore Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, NY; 2Keio UniversitySchool of Medicine, Neuropsychiatry, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan; 3Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts derIsar der Technischen Universitt Mnchen, Mnchen, Germany; 4Kyorin University School of Medicine, Neuropsychiatry, Mitaka,Tokyo, Japan; 5Biostat, Inc, Englewood, NJ; 6Hofstra North Shore LIJ School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and MolecularMedicine, Hempstead, NY; 7Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Deparment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Bronx, NY;8The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY

    *To whom correspondence should be addressed; Division of Psychiatry Research, the Zucker Hillside Hospital, 75-59 263rd Street, GlenOaks, NY 11004, US; tel: (718) 470-4812, fax: (718) 343-1659, e-mail: [email protected]

    Results from this study were presented at the Schizophrenia International Research Society 3rd biennial meeting, April 1418, Florence,Italy, and the NCDEU 52nd Annual meeting, May 29-June 1, 2012 Arizona, USA.

    Background: While long-acting injectable antipsychotics(LAIs) are hoped to reduce high relapse rates in schizophre-nia, recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) challengedthe benefits of LAIs over oral antipsychotics (OAPs).

    Methods:Systematic review/meta-analysis of RCTs thatlasted 6 months comparing LAIs and OAPs. Primaryoutcome was study-defined relapse at the longest timepoint; secondary outcomes included relapse at 3, 6, 12, 18,

    and 24 months, all-cause discontinuation, discontinuationdue to adverse events, drug inefficacy (ie, relapse + discon-tinuation due to inefficacy), hospitalization, and nonad-

    herence. Results:Across 21 RCTs (n= 5176), LAIs weresimilar to OAPs for relapse prevention at the longest timepoint (studies = 21, n= 4950, relative risk [RR] = 0.93,95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.801.08, P = .35). Thefinding was confirmed restricting the analysis to outpa-tient studies lasting 1 year (studies = 12, RR = 0.93, 95%CI:0.711.07, P= .31). However, studies using first-gener-

    ation antipsychotic (FGA)-LAIs (studies = 10, RR = 0.82,95% CI:0.690.97, P = .02) and those published 1991

    (consisting exclusively of all 8 fluphenazine-LAI studies;RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.650.96, P= 0.02) were superior toOAPs regarding the primary outcome. Pooled LAIs alsodid not separate from OAPs regarding any secondary out-comes. Again, studies using FGA-LAIs and those published

    1991 were associated with LAI superiority over OAPs, eg,hospitalization and drug inefficacy. Conclusions:In RCTs,which are less representative of real-world patients than nat-uralistic studies, pooled LAIs did not reduce relapse com-pared with OAPs in schizophrenia patients. The exceptions

    were FGA-LAIs, mostly consisting of fluphenazine-LAIstudies, which were all conducted through 1991. Because

    this finding is vulnerable to a cohort bias, studies compar-ing FGA-LAI vs second-generation antipsychotics-LAIand LAI vs OAP RCTs in real-world patients are needed.

    Key words:antipsychotics/adherence/depot/long-actinginjection/meta-analysis/relapse/schizophrenia/treatment

    discontinuation

    Introduction

    Because psychopathology and social functioning canworsen with repeated psychotic episodes in patients withschizophrenia,1,2 relapse prevention is critical. There isstrong evidence of antipsychotic efficacy for relapse preven-tion in chronic and first-episode patients,3,4in that the risk ofrelapse is 26 times higher without medication.36However,because nonadherence rates as high as 50% can limit theefficacy of pharmacotherapy,7,8 the use of long-acting

    injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) is an important option.9

    Inpractice, patients and clinicians are sometimes reluctant touse LAIs because of stigma, needle pain, time constraints,side effect concerns, and cost.10Given these drawbacks tothe use of LAIs, convincing data showing the superiority ofLAI over oral antipsychotics (OAPs) is needed to supportthe use of LAIs. The first LAI was introduced in the 1960s.Since then, at least 5 first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs)-LAIs and 3 second-generation antipsychotics (SGA)-LAIshave become available. Our previous meta-analysis found

    Schizophrenia Bulletin Advance Access published January 2, 2013

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/10/2019 Schizophr Bull 2012 Kishimoto Schbul Sbs150

    2/22

  • 8/10/2019 Schizophr Bull 2012 Kishimoto Schbul Sbs150

    3/22

    Page 3 of 22

    Table1.DescriptionofIncludedStu

    dies

    Study/Country

    na

    Study

    Design

    D

    uration

    (wks)

    InclusionCriteria

    Definition

    ofRelapse-

    Related

    Outcome

    Mean

    Age(Range)

    (y.o.)

    %Male

    %Hpat

    BaselineI

    nformation

    R

    egarding

    C

    hronicity

    (#Hp,

    D

    urationof

    illnessetc.)

    Medication

    Randomized#

    Safety/

    Efficacy#

    MeanDose

    (Range)

    First-generationantipsychoticLAIs

    Fulphenazinedepot

    Crawfordand

    Forrest4574/UK

    31

    DBDD40

    Stableand

    cooperativeOPs

    withSCZwho

    areadherentto

    medicationand

    attendingthe

    clinic

    Withdraw

    alb:

    terminationof

    thetriald

    ueto

    significan

    tSx

    thatwarranted

    unblindin

    gthe

    treatmentin

    ordertoinform

    futurePt

    managem

    ent

    NR(2065)

    29

    0

    N

    R

    FPZdecanoate

    14

    14

    NR(Same

    doseas

    beforethe

    trial)

    Triflu-

    operazine

    17

    15

    10mg/d

    (fixed)

    DelGiudice

    etal.2

    575/USA

    88

    DBDD/

    RMc

    69

    IPswithSCZwho

    respondedtooral

    FPZandwere

    discharged

    Re-Hpb

    NR(2050)

    100

    0

    4

    8.8%had

    5

    10Hpsin

    thepast

    FPZEnanthate

    27

    27

    25mg/2

    wks(fixed)

    FPZ

    61

    61

    21.7mg

    (580mg)

    Rifkinetal.2

    7

    77/USA

    73d

    DBDD52

    StableOPseon

    FPZdepotororal

    for4wks,nomore

    thanminorside

    effects,cooperative

    andcompliant

    Relapse:clinical

    deterioration

    withmarked

    social

    impairme

    nt

    23.7(1738)

    67

    0

    M

    ean#of

    H

    psinthe

    p

    ast:1.79

    FPZdecanoate

    23

    23

    NR(0.52ml/

    2wks)

    FPZ

    28

    28

    NR(520mg)

    Falloonetal.2

    6

    78/UK

    53

    DBDD52

    SCZPtsreturning

    tothecommunity

    followingHpofan

    acuteschizophrenic

    episode

    Relapse:

    reappearanceor

    exacerbationof

    schizophrenic

    featuresthatled

    towithdrawal

    fromthetrial,

    regardlessof

    re-Hp

    39(1760)

    45

    0

    8

    1%had2

    H

    psinthe

    p

    ast

    FPZdecanoate

    NR

    20

    25mg/2

    wksf

    (flexible)

    Pimozide

    NR

    24

    8mg/df

    (flexible)

  • 8/10/2019 Schizophr Bull 2012 Kishimoto Schbul Sbs150

    4/22

    Page 4 of 22

    Study/Country

    na

    Study

    Design

    D

    uration

    (w

    ks)

    InclusionCriteria

    Definition

    ofRelapse-

    Related

    Outcome

    Mean

    Age(Range)

    (y.o.)

    %Male

    %Hpat

    BaselineI

    nformation

    R

    egarding

    C

    hronicity

    (#Hp,

    D

    urationof

    illnessetc.)

    Medication

    Randomized#

    Safety/

    Efficacy#

    MeanDose

    (Range)

    Hogartyetal.4

    6

    79/USA

    105

    DBDD104

    PtswithSCZ

    whoreceived

    majorneuroleptic

    treatmentduring

    theHpandwas

    discharged

    Relapse:

    unequivocal

    clinicaldeterio-

    rationof

    such

    magnitud

    ethat

    Hpappea

    red

    imminentafter

    allreason

    able

    attemptsto

    maintain

    Pts

    withstudy

    medicatio

    n

    failedorsuicide

    34.2(1855)

    46

    0

    8

    8%had1

    H

    pinthe

    p

    ast

    FPZdecanoate

    55

    55

    34mg/2

    wks(12.5

    125mg/2

    wks)

    FPZ

    50

    50

    9.9mg/d

    (2.5

    40mg/d)

    Schooleretal.4

    3

    80/USA

    290

    DBDD52

    PtswithSCZdis-

    chargedafteracute

    phasetreatment

    andbeingtreated

    incommunity

    Relapse:

    deterioration

    thatcouldnot

    managed

    sat-

    isfactoryafter

    adjustmentof

    dosagewithin

    protocollimits

    29(1855)

    59

    100/0g1

    00%newly

    H

    p

    FPZdecanoate

    143

    107h

    34.2mg/3

    wks(12.5

    100mg/3

    wks)

    FPZ

    147

    107h

    24.8mg/d

    (2.5-

    60mg/d)

    Barnesetal.4

    7

    83/UK

    36

    DBDD52

    OPswithSCZ

    (PSE)regu-

    larlyreceiving

    depotFPZfor

    6months,and

    willingtopartici-

    patethetrial

    Relapse:

    marked

    exacerbation

    ofpsycho

    tic

    featuresrequir-

    ingincrea

    se

    medicatio

    nand

    re-Hp

    49.5(NR)50

    0

    77.8%

    h

    avesocial

    p

    erformance

    limitations

    FPZdecanoate

    19

    19

    NR(same

    doseas

    beforethe

    trial)

    Pimozide

    17

    17

    NR(dose

    equivalent

    beforethe

    trial)

    Kanenoetal.4

    8

    91/Japan

    263

    DBDD24

    ChronicPts

    withSCZwho

    needlong-term

    treatment

    Treatmen

    t

    discontinuation

    duetowo

    rsen-

    ingofpsychiat-

    ricSxb

    NR(NR)i65

    NR

    D

    urationof

    illnesswas

    10yearsin

    8

    1%

    FPZdecanoate

    130

    127

    12.6

    50mg/4

    wksf

    (75mg/4

    wks)

    HAL

    133

    132

    3.112.0mg/df

    (18mg/d)

    Table1.Continued

  • 8/10/2019 Schizophr Bull 2012 Kishimoto Schbul Sbs150

    5/22

    Page 5 of 22

    Study/Country

    na

    Study

    Design

    D

    uration

    (wks)

    InclusionCriteria

    Definition

    ofRelapse-

    Related

    Outcome

    Mean

    Age(Range)

    (y.o.)

    %Male

    %Hpat

    BaselineI

    nformation

    R

    egarding

    C

    hronicity

    (

    #Hp,

    D

    urationof

    illnessetc.)

    Medication

    Randomized#

    Safety/

    Efficacy#

    MeanDose

    (Range)

    Haloperidoldepot

    Glicketal.4

    905/

    USA

    35

    OL

    48

    OPswithSCZor

    SzADj (DSM-IV)

    whorequirelong-

    termtherapy

    Ptswhowere

    nolongerexac-

    erbationfreeb

    42.3(NR)80

    0

    M

    ean

    d

    uration

    o

    fillness:

    1

    6.5years

    HAL

    decanoate

    14

    10/9

    170mg/4

    wks(200mg/4

    wksk)

    QUE

    21

    19/16

    493mg/d

    (500mg/dk)

    Zuclopenthixoldepot

    Arangoetal.2

    406/

    Spain

    46

    RM

    52

    PtswithSCZ

    (DSM-IV)who

    hadaviolent

    episodeinthe

    previousyear,with

    ascoreofatleast

    3onthephysical

    aggressionsubscale

    ofthemodified

    OvertAggression

    Scale

    Hpb

    34.0(NR)83

    0

    N

    R

    Zuclopen-

    thixoldepot

    26

    26

    233mg/2

    wks(NR)

    Zuclopen-

    thixol

    20

    20

    35mg/d

    (NR)

    Second-generationantipsychotic-LA

    Is

    Olanzapine-LAI

    Kaneetal.1

    310/

    International

    1065lDBDD24

    Clinicallystable

    PtswithSCZ

    (DSM-IV)defined

    ashavingOP

    statusfor4wks,

    withaBPRS-P4

    onthefollowing

    items:conceptual

    disorganization,

    suspiciousness,hal-

    lucinatorybehav-

    ior,andunusual

    thoughtcontent

    Psychotic

    exac-

    erbationb

    :(1)

    anincreaseof

    anyBPRS-Pto

    ascoreof>4,

    withanabso-

    luteincre

    ase

    2forthe

    specificit

    em,

    (2)increa

    seof

    anyBPRS-Pto

    ascore>4,with

    anabsolu

    te

    increase4on

    thepositive

    subscale,

    (3)

    Hpastheresult

    ofworsening

    ofpositiv

    e

    psychotic

    Sx

    38.9(1875)

    65

    0

    M

    ean

    d

    uration

    o

    fillness:

    1

    3.3years.

    3

    6.9%had

    2psychotic

    e

    pisodesor

    e

    xacerba-

    t

    ionsinlast

    2

    4months

    OLA-LAI

    599

    599

    150mg/2

    wks,

    405mg/4

    wks,

    300mg/2

    wks(fixed)

    OLA

    322

    322

    14.3mg/d

    (10,15,

    20mg/d)

    Table1.Continued

  • 8/10/2019 Schizophr Bull 2012 Kishimoto Schbul Sbs150

    6/22

    Page 6 of 22

    Study/Country

    na

    Study

    Design

    D

    uration

    (wks)

    InclusionCriteria

    Definition

    ofRelapse-

    Related

    Outcome

    Mean

    Age(Range)

    (y.o.)

    %Male

    %Hpat

    BaselineI

    nformation

    R

    egarding

    C

    hronicity

    (

    #Hp,

    D

    urationof

    illnessetc.)

    Medication

    Randomized#

    Safety/

    Efficacy#

    MeanDose

    (Range)

    Detkeetal.5

    0

    11/International

    524

    OL

    104

    OPswithSCZ

    (DSM-IV)who

    hadnoacuteHpin

    the8wkspriorto

    visit1,PANSS-T

    25%

    increasein

    PANSS-T

    ,

    including

    25%increase

    including

    10

    pointsincrease

    (3)1inc

    rease

    inCGI-S

    CGI-Sof

    4,

    (4)delibe

    rate

    self-injuryor

    injurytoothers,

    (5)discon

    tinua-

    tionfrom

    study

    becauseo

    f

    worseningofSx

    40.9(1865)

    67

    0

    M

    ean

    d

    uration

    o

    fillness:

    1

    4.7years.

    M

    ean#of

    p

    sychoticepi-

    s

    odeinlast

    2

    4months:

    2

    .7

    OLALAI

    264

    264

    386.6mg/4

    wks(15

    405mg/4

    wks)

    OLA

    260

    260

    12.7mg/d

    (520mg/d)

    Risperidone-LAI

    Keksetal.5

    1

    07/International

    629mOL

    53

    IP/OPswith

    SCZorSzADn

    (DSM-IV)who

    hadacuteexac-

    erbation(Hpor

    requiringmedical

    intervention)inthe

    past2months,and

    hadanadditional

    acuteexacerbation

    inthepast2years,

    PANSS-T50,

    BMI40

    Significan

    t

    deterioration

    b):1)HpforSx

    exacerbation,

    2)needfo

    ran

    increased

    level

    ofcareand2

    pointsincrease

    inCGI-S

    over

    2wks,3)

    self-

    injury,suicidal/

    homicida

    lide-

    ationorv

    iolent

    behavior

    35.2(18)

    57

    44

    M

    ean

    d

    uration

    o

    fillness:

    8

    .6years

    RIS-LAI

    253

    247

    40.7mg/2

    wks(25,

    50mg/2

    wks)

    OLA

    310

    300

    14.6mg/d

    (520mg/d)

    Table1.Continued

  • 8/10/2019 Schizophr Bull 2012 Kishimoto Schbul Sbs150

    7/22

    Page 7 of 22

    Study/Country

    na

    Study

    Design

    D

    uration

    (wks)

    InclusionCriteria

    Definition

    ofRelapse-

    Related

    Outcome

    Mean

    Age(Range)

    (y.o.)

    %Male

    %Hpat

    BaselineI

    nformation

    R

    egarding

    C

    hronicity

    (

    #Hp,

    D

    urationof

    illnessetc.)

    Medication

    Randomized#

    Safety/

    Efficacy#

    MeanDose

    (Range)

    Baietal.2

    3

    07/Taiwan

    50

    RM

    48

    Symptomatically

    stableSCZ

    (DSM-IV)andhave

    beenonoralRIS

    for3months,

    PANSS-T