00059___26bdd81655f7cd3484fc9a88674c8f7e

Upload: aung-kyaw-moe

Post on 03-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 00059___26bdd81655f7cd3484fc9a88674c8f7e

    1/1

    APODICTICITY 37

    content with an empty something, a formal category, and to eliminate all

    assertions of existence. So , for example, if we consider the analyticallynecessary proposition This house includes its roof, its walls, its floors,

    and its other parts, we can formalize that proposition replacing all its

    material components with the purely formal ones of whole and part.

    In this manner we arrive at the purely formal, analytically necessary, a

    priori law: Any whole includes its parts.

    There can be a relative concretumwhose name includes as part of its

    meaning a reference to other relative concreta apart from which the

    relative concretum cannot be understood. The propositions articulating

    such relationships are also analytically necessary propositions. Forexample, the proposition There cannot be a parent without children

    expresses an analytic necessity. Terms such as parent and child have,

    as part of their meaning a necessary reference to another object. In such

    propositions there is no connection established between two essences; the

    notion of child is included in that of parent, and vice versa. The relation

    of parent to child, therefore, is analogous to that of whole to part.

    The terms color and extension, on the other hand, do not include

    a reference to one another as part of their meaning. Nevertheless, by virtue

    of its essence color is necessarily and universally, that is, lawfully, related

    to extension. Given, however, that color does not as part of its meaning

    include a reference to something else, the necessity of the principle A

    color cannot exist without some extension that it covers is not analytic.

    See also SYNTHETIC A PRIORI LAW.

    ANTHROPOLOGISM. Anthropologism is that instance of specific

    relativism that claims that truth is relative to the human species, that is,

    that what is true is what seems or is taken to be true by human beings byvirtue of their specific make-up. Truth has its source not in the individual

    human, as in individual relativism, but in the empirical constitution of the

    species. See also PSYCHOLOGISM.

    ANTHROPOLOGY. Anthropology is the descriptive science that studies

    the human species.

    APODICTICITY (Apodikti zi tt). Apodicticity is a property ofevidence, and

    one of the types ofabsolute evidence that Husserl identifies. An apodicticevidenc e is indubitable. Apodicticity must be distinguished from both

    infallibility and incorrigibility. To say that evidence is apodictic does not

    mean that it is impossible for us to be mistaken or that it is impossible that

    our insight will be subject to various forms of correction. It means only