5-3 /مارس/2015 جامعة الشارقة، اإلمارات iacqa›2015 المؤتمر...
TRANSCRIPT
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
521
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
522
.. -
:
" 041( "562 ) " 052"
: (65..01 ) (04.41)
(01.540 ) (01.121 ) ( 01.044 ) ( 01.511)
( 01.044) (04.41)
.
( ) :
:
(5111) . ( 5100 )
. (Fred, M. & Ann, A. (2008
.
. ( 5105 )
.
( 5100 ) :
. -0 -5
.
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
523
3-
4-
5-
6-
:
:
1.
2.
1-
2-
.
3-
.
:
:
1.
.
2.
.
3.
.
1. 2.
2014-2015
3. .
Planning
"
: Stratgy Planning
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
524
. "
:
: Planning
.
(5105: ) Strategic Planning :
"
5111:" "
( 1..0) .
( " 5112)
( 5100 ) "
. ( " (Mcnamara (2011 )
"
( 5110 ) :
. -0 -5
. . -1 -4
. ( 5116 )
: -0
. ) -5
(. . -1
.
: ( 5115 )
: . -0 . -5 . -1 . -4 . -2 " " -6 ( :5101 ) . -0 . -5 "SWAT " -1 . -4
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
525
( 5101 ) :
" -0 .
" ) -5 " "
" ". -1
( 5100 )
.( 5101 )
:
-0 .
-5 .
. -1 . -4 -2
. -6
. -1
. -4
. -.
. . -01
:
: *
:
( 11 )
: ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ) (
( )
: : " "
( 02 )
.
: :
-0
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
526
) (
( 11) ) (
) ( (1.144 1.16. 1.400- 1.442 1.142 1.112)
( 1.411 ) .
: -5
" .1.64 " .
" "
: -0
( 562 ) ( 052) ( 041 )
. ) -5
- - -
(
( ) -1 .
-4
- ) ( . ""
-2 .
-6 .
:
) ""
(
:
: :
"
".
"" .
(0 ) ""
" "
(041 )
"" (021)
1.131 3..1 13.31 1..1 13.31 1.181 2.12 13.13 1.31 13.21
1.333 1.21 11.11 1.11 11.11 1.233 .1.3 13.32 1.33 13.31
1.118 2..2 13.11 2.11 13.21 1.283 2.18 13.21 2.13 13.21
"
" .
. :
"
".
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
527
.
(5 )
1.13 3..1 8..1 ...1 3..1 .1.1
1.13 1.11 3..1 1.11 8..1 1.11
1.11 1.13 1.11 1.11 1.11 3..1
1.11 3..1 1.11 1.11 1.11 8..1
1.11 .1.1 8..1 3..1 1.11 1.11
1.11 1.11 8..1 1.13 1.11 3..1
( 1.10 )
.
. : :
:
: "
: (1 )
04.141 0.120 65..01 0.644 01.121 41..0 01.540 5.021 01.511 44..0 01.044 5.266
(04.41) (65..01 )
( 01.121 ) (01.540 ) ( 01.511 )
( 01.044 )
( 01.044) (04.41)
. " :
:
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
528
(4 )
164.1 ...5 . 011.1 .4.5 . 120.1 42.5 120.1 42.5 120.1 42.5 . 11..1 44.5 . 11..1 45.5 .
.5.1 1.4161.454 65.1
61.45 5.16 410.1 25.1 410.1 12.5 . 41..1 11.5 . 442.1 11.5 . 44..1 15.5 . 421.1 10.5 . 424.1 11.5 . 6.4.1 6..5 111.1 64.5 . 414.1 . 5.64 44..1 . 5.61 .11.1 . 5.61 4.1.1 . 5.61 011.1 2..5 . .1.10 21.5 .
151.1 25.5 . 151.1 21.5 . 551.1 46.5 .
4.6.1 41.5 . 151.1 . 5.41
( 2 ) -0 :
-5( ...5) -1 (4..5)
-4 (5.42)
-2 (5.42)
( 2. )(5.42) -0:
-5 (5.25) (5.21)
-1 -4(. 5.46)
-2 (0.41) (. 5.41)
(5.41) ( ...5 )
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
529
. :
: : )(
.1 .
.2
. .3
. "" .1
. .1
. )( :
.1
. .2
. .3
.
(: 5105 ) .1
.4 54 ) (
(:5100 ) .2
" "
(:5111) .3
. (1) .1
(: 5101)
-011 5101 10 014.
(:5101 ) .1 "
.45 (: 5100 ) ..
5100 .5 .455
(: 5115) .1 " "
.04 50 (: 5100 ) .8
http://www.shatharat.net/vb/showthread.php ( : 5111 ) .3
.(: 5100 ) .11
006 -002 5100 01(: 5112 ) .11
.8 12. 12-Fred, M. & Ann, A. (2008): Strategic
Planning for Higher Education in Developing Countries Challenges and Lessons, Planning for Higher Education, Vol. (36), No. (3), P P. 5 21.
13. 13-Mcnamara (2011): educational strategic planning management help orgation, United kind, p23.
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
530
.. . . .. ..
.. .. .. .. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
:
) 5 3 CIQAP ( CIQAP
3 . .
) 3 2 (
2( ) CIQAP. CIQAP ( ) 2 ( )
( ) ) " )
( (
.
: .
:
.
17( 2002/2007) :
.
1/7/2013
.
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
531
" "
.
1974 ( . 18 )
. 2012/2013. 2004
. "
. "
"
: :
-
- .
- .
: -
.
-
. -
. : - -
.
) - (. :
( 30/9/2013 1/10/2012) ( . 30/9/2014 1/10/2013)
) (
. :
. :
: Base Line -
-
CIQAP
-
CIQAP :
-
-
) -
( -
(.
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
532
:
(Quality Assurance )
.(2) ( Accreditation ) (3)
Status .
(4)( Institutional Accreditation )
.
Subject) . Accreditation )
.
. :
2013 2012 2014
2014 ( 1( )1 )
.
. . : . ( 5 ) CIQAP ( 4 ) CIQAP( 2)
( 5 ) .CIQAP
( .2 )
: :
. :
. 5
(9 ) (2 )
2014 2012 :
-
- ( NORMS )
-
-
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
533
-
-
-
.
-
:) :
(:( 2 )
CIQAP
CIQAP
( 2 )
)/(
- -
-
-
1
2 3
4 5 6 7 8
9
0 9 7 2
( 3 ) : (2 )
CIQAP ( ( 4 (3 )
CIQAP 5 ) %60 )
( 6 ) ( 5 )
( 7 ) (6)
.%50
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
534
CIQAP ( 3 )
2010 2010 2009 2009 2009
2012
(2012)
2013 % (20) (%50) )%( (CIQAP (30%) (40%
( 4 )
2011 2011 2011 2011
CIQAP
( %60 )
CIQAP
( %50)
CIQAP
( %55 )
CIQAP
( %60 ) CIQAP
( 5 )
%60 % 80 CIQAP 26/12/2012 26/12/2012
( 6 )
%5
%5
( 7 )
%50 %30 %30 %40 %40
( 2 ) CIQAP
( 5 )
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
535
( 3 ) CIQAP
( 6 )
( 4 )
) :
(8 ) (:
( . 7 )
( 8 )
/
( 5 ) : CIQAP
5 %100
( 4 ) :
CIQAP %80 4
( 1 ) : %100 CIQAP 1
2 : %40
( 6 ) : 6
%100 -
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
536
( 7 )
:
(7 ) ( 9 )
CIQAP
( 7 ) %100
( 9 )
CIQAP 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
( 8 )CIQAP
(9( )10 )
CIQAP
CIQAP
%40 (8 )
( 10 )
-- -- CIQAP 30% 40%
) (
)(
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
537
( 9)CIQAP
( 11 )
( 11 )
CIQAP
( 11 )
CIQAP
9/3/2014 )(
)
: ( 12 )
..
( 12 )
10%
%10
(10( )13 ) %70
( 13 )
50% 60% 50% 40% 70% 50%
( 10 )
3
) 2 (
) CIQAP(
( ) CIQAP. 2 2( )
) ( )
)
" (
(
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
538
: -
-
- -
- -
-
-
-
-
-
:1. Criteria For Accrediting Engineering
Technology Programs, Effective For Evaluations During the 2008 2009 Accreditation Cycle, Approved by the ABET, November 2007.
2. TAJ Mohieldin, Handbook of Assessment and Accreditation, 2006 , University of Bahrain, College of Engineering
3. The British Accreditation Council For Independent Further and Higher Education BAC, Accreditation handbook 2006 2007, London, 2006.
4. Quinn, Anita; Lemay, Gina; Larsen; Peter and Johnson, Dana (2009), "Service quality in higher education", Total Quality Management, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 139152
) ( - .
- .
- .
- .
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
539
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
540
. / -
:
.
. :
:
.
.
:
.
.
:
.
( (1))
)
(
. ( (2) )
.
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
541
( (3) )
):
( . : ( (4) )
.
:
.
: . .1 .2
. .3
. :
: . .1 .2
. .3
. :
:
.
)(
-
. :
. -
:) ( .
.
. :
: ) (
: : . (5) . " :
" : "
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
542
." (6)
: "
." (7) :
:
. (8) ) ( + ) :
( .) ( + .
.
. :
. :
:
.1 .
.2 .
. .3 . .4 . .5 .6
. .7
.
.8 .
.9 .
. .10 .11
. .12
. .13
.(9)
()
. :
:
. .1 .2
. .3
. . .4 .5
. . .6 . .7 . (10) .8
:
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
543
.1
. : .2
.
. .3
.
.4 .
. . .5
.
.6.
. .7
.
. .8 . .9
. .10 .
. .11 . (11)
. -
:
.
: . .1 ) .2
( . .3
. .4
. .5
. . .6 . .7 . .8 ) .9
( . .10
. (12) :
.1 .
. .2 . .3 . .4 .5
. . .6 . .7 : .8
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
544
.
: .9
. . .10 . .11 .12
. (13) :
. (14)
.
:
. :
. .1 . .2 . .3 . .4 . (51) .5
: .1
. .
.2 .
.3 :
. - . - . - -
. -
. (61)
: : .1
. : .2
. : .3
. : .4
. : .5
: . . 17) ) .
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
545
( )
) (
. (81)
- - - ) .
: (( )
.
. (91) :
)(
: "
. " (20)
: "
. (21)
: "
" .
.
:
. :
.1.
.
. .2
. .3
. (22) : "
." (23)
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
546
.
: .
.
. (24) :
:
:
. : )
( : )
( : )
( . " " :
. :
. :
.
:
. (52)
. :
.
: : .1
. .
: .2 .
.
: .3
.
: .4
.
. : .5
.
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
547
: .6 .
: .7 . (62)
. :
:: .1
. : .2
.
: .3
. : .4
. (72)
.
. :
: : -
.: -
.
: -
.
:
. (28)
:
. =
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
548
:
: 1
.
2
.
.
:
.1 .
.2 .
.3
.
: .4
. .5
.
.6
. :
.1
.
.2
.
.3 .
.4 .
.5
.
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
549
: ( 2005) .1
10 . 63 33
( 2007) .2 "
( 2008) .3
- .
( 2003) .4
.
( 2013 ) .5
. 239
( 2009 ) .6 . 181
( 2013 ) .7
. 170 ( 2013 ) .8
. 240 239 ( 2007 ) .9
. 19
( 2009 ) .10
115 . ( 2009 ) .11
. 117 - 115
( 2009 ) .12
2 . 82 81
( 2007) .13
.32 31 ( 2007) .14
.175 -
( 1999 ) .15 9000
. 96 92 - ( 2005) .16
. 464
( 2007 ) .17
" " . 51 50 -
( 2014 ) .18
. 85 - 84 ( 2008 ) .19
. 23
( 2010 ) .20
. 8
( 2010) .21
. 14
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
550
.22 2 . 314 313 2004
( 2005 ) .23
. 406 ( 2005 ) .24
. 442 436
( 2005 ) .25
. 407 ( 2013 ) .26
. 363 362
( 2010 ) .27
11 10
( 2013) .28
. 372
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
551
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
552
" "
) (
) (
:
.
)
. (
) )( : (33: 6002:
)
( 6022
) ( 6022
) (6022
( )
.
6002
6002 )
(6002 .
.
( ) 6002 ) ( 6009) (6002
(.6022)
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
553
. (69: 6002 :)
.
.
.
:
: .2
.6
.3
.2
. : .2
.
.6
. . .3 .2
. :
:
. ( (
(
: :
-6023 ) : .26022)
: .6 .
: .3 . :
" "water son : )
(20 99: 6000: :
: :
.
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
554
. " : :
."
:" (88: 0222 ) :
". (Literature Review )
.
) (0222 ) ( )
..
( 600 ) (T) .
. .
. .
.Bevzner)0222 )
%22 . .
.
( 0222 . )
: "
(0222 )) .
(9229)
:
( 6002 )
)/ ()
) ( Bevzner)0222( )6002( ) 6009
) ( ) (
(Study Methodology ) )(
.
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
555
(Study Population& Sampling)
23 .
( 20 ) ( 3 )
. :
"
)
(223: 2929 :
.
( 6009 ):
( .6009( : 6002): ( 96 )
) / ( .
.(Reliability) .
.
( ) X( ) =
]2( _ )2 ] [ 2( _ )2 [
( 60 )
( 0. 22= )
(0.02.)
:
.
: 0.92= 0. 22= 6
(02 .0 )
: ( T )
: .
:
)
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
556
(1 )
.
0.0 %20 %20 -2 -6.22 %22 %32 -6 -6.22 %90 %30 -3 -3.29 %92 %62 -2 - 2 %92 %66 -2 -2.26 %20 %20 -2 -2.22 %22 %26 -9 2 %23 %29 -2
0.22= 2.20 * 0.82= 2.21 ( 2 2 3 6 )
( 0.02 0.02 )
. ( 2 9 2 2 )
.
( 0 ) ( )
.
-6.29 %22 %36 -2 -3.2 %92 %62 -12 -3.2 %92 %62 -11 -3.6 %93 %69 -10 -6.29 %22 %36 -11 2.22 %23 %39 -12 -2.2 %20 %20 -10
22 20 9 ) ( 0.02 0.02 )( 23
22 . )
( 22 .
(1 ) ()
.
-3.2 %92 %62 -22 -0.2 %23 %29 -29 -2.0 %20 %20 -22 -6.29 %22 %36 -29
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
557
-2.6 %20 %60 -60 -3.6 %93 %69 -62 -6.22 %22 %32 -66
0.22= 2.20* 0.82= 2.21 29 22 )
( 0.02) ( 62 60
.
( 66 22 29 ) .
) ( (2 )
.
-6.29 %22 %36 -63 -3.6 %93 %69 -62 -6.22 %90 %30 -62 -6.29 %22 %36 -62 -6.22 %90 %30 . 69 -6.22 %90 %30 . 62
0.22= 2.20* 0.82= 2.21 ( 62: 63 )
( 0.02 0.02 )
.
:
( 6022 )
) ( 6002
) ( 6002
( 6002 )
( 6002 )
.
: :
)( ( 1 .2
( ) .
.
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
558
. .6 .3
. .2
. .2
. .2
. .9
. . (0 . .2 . .6 .3
. .2
. . (3 . .2 .6
. .3
. .2
. .2
. .2
. . (2 .2
. .6
. .3
.
: :
.2 .
.6 .
.3 .
.2 .
.2 .
.2 .
.9 .
.2 .
. .2 .6
. .3
: : -1
(6002) .
2 : -2 6002
: -3 6002
6002 : -4 : -5
6006
: -6
6002: .
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
559
: -7
6002 : -8
6002
: -9
6002 : -11
2992
: -11
6009 : -12
2922 : -13
26/2/6022-20 .
: -14
22 . : -15
2992
2 : -16 6000
: -17
6002 : -18
: (2002 -8811 )
22 : -19
2992
: -21 6002
: -21
26003 : -22
6000 2
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
560
- -
- -
:
.
.
. :
:(Introduction)
.
.
.
( 8991( )0222 )
. :
:(Problem Background) "
( " 8991 )
".
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
561
.( OCDE )
"
. "
...
:
(: 1 )
) ( .
: 113
" " :
.
.
: (
.
(
. - (
.
.
.
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
562
.
: ( "" Le Robert, T6 )
(University) (Universitas)
8081 " "
( .8731 )
) (
.
(: 20 )
. "
" (20 )
. :
:
.8 " ".
" .0
". .1
.
.4 .
.7
. .6
.
.3 ) ...(
.1
" ". .9
" ".
. .82 .88
. .80
. " .81
"
. .84
.
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
563
.87
.:
:
. "
.
".
"
(EOQC )
".
.
" .
.
".
: .8
. .0
. . .1 .4
. . .7 .6
" " .
.3 .
.1 .
. .9 . .82
"
: (: ) . 1
" ".
. :
. .8
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
564
.0
. .1
.
.
: . 0
.
: . .8 . .0 . .1 .4
.
: . 3
"
".
" (1994
"
.
(:1998 )(Boterf, 1984)
.... : . 4
.
.
(Parkinson) " "
. :
: . 8 .8
"
" .
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
565
.0
.
.1
. .4
.
. .
.
". .7
"
"
.
( 0221 )
: . -8 -0
.
-1
. -4
. -7
. -6
. -3
.
.
.
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
566
)(
.
( F. Santos et al, 1998 ) :
(: 03) .
: : .8
. : .0
.
(:participative ) .1
)
...(. : .4
) (
.
. : .7
.
: .8
.
.0
. .1
".
.I- ::
1
2
3
4
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
567
.
.
) (
:
(: 04)
. " (0224)
.
".
Gade
: . .8 . .0 .1
. . .4 . .7 . .6 . .3 . .1
.
: :
:
.
...
...
...
...
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
568
.
.
: "
"
.
(C.Musselin, E.Freidberg)
"
".
:
.
: -8
.
[ ]
.
.
. : -0
:
-8 .
-0
.
.
.
. " "
(M.Crozier) :
: -
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
569
-
1-
2-
1971 1983 1987 1993 1999 2003
2004.
1
:
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
3
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
570
: .
.
. "
12/18
".
. :4
.
8939/8912
%81 %81.0
%82.7 8911/8914
( % 84.1 )
.
:
" .8 .
.0
". )
(:072-23 071-91
01 039-21 0221
: :
. :1
. : . :
071-91
.
:
-
. -
.
- /
.
- .
-
.
: . - . -
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
571
- .
- .
- .
. -
( . 0/1) . :
039-21 91-071
) (
. : .
. :
.
. :0
. :
. :1 . :
. : . :
. :0 071-91
8999 1 :
. :
. . :
071-91 : 039-21
1
8999.
.
.
.
: 141-26 0226 03
039-21
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
572
.
:(Conclusion)
:(References) ( 0221 ) .8
: .
( 8992) .0 .
( 8999/0222 ) .1 .
( 8( )0221 ) .4 )
( .
( 0224 ) .7
. ( 0227 ) .6
. ( 8991 ) .3
. ( 2002) .1
. ( 1998) .9
: .
( 0221 ) .82 :
.
( 0228 ) .88
. 8991 .80
.
(0226 ) .81 (0220 ) .84: ( 8993 ) .87
. : ( 8193 ) .86
. ( 0228 ) .83
) ( .
( 90/91 ) .81
.) ( 19. A.Gimenez, )1999(, Les prsidents
duniversits en France, facult des sciences administratives, thse prsente pour l'obtention du diplme de Doctorat, universit Panthon Assas, Paris.
20. P. Robert, )1985(, Le Robert de la langue franaise, T6: dictionnaire alphabtique et analogique de la langue franaise, librairie Robert, Paris.
21. W. Khlif, Z. Bouallegue, )2004(, De luniversit luniversit de gestion : rflexion sur la pdagogie, cas lenseignement de la stratgie, in enseignement suprieur en Europe, Vol XXIX, N 2, Unesco, Paris
22. Ingrid Moses, )1996(, questions de personnel et structure des tablissements, in gestion de l'enseignement suprieur, OCDE, Paris.
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
573
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
574
. - -
:
(334 ) .
( . 290 ) .
: .
.
. :
: .
.
.
.
.
. :
:
:
.1
.2
:
-
.
. .
: .
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
575
: .1
. .2
.
: :
1 0H : (P ( 0.05
.
:
14-8 2004) : : & ,Gasik Kotecki, 2011, 73-78 Amirkhami, Tajmirriahi, J., & Mohammad, 2012, 142 Jashapara, 2011, 12, 68-89 28 2012
Poland, 2011, 26 Yang, Hongming & Zhang 2011, 419 Cho, 2011, 133 ) ) ( ) (.2009
: :
) (
. :
.
:
. :
. :
. :
.
:
.
:
.
. . .
. .
. . .
. .
.
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
576
:
: .
. (2009)
,Swoa, Neweu, Scarbrough & Hislop, 1999)
(262
(Marwick, 2001, 814).
(Zhang, 2007, 66 )
(Cho, 2011, 6)
(Kotecki, 2011, 1)
) ( ( )
,Delen, Zaim)
Kuzey, & Zaim, 2013, 1158)
:
. (Explicit)
.
(Tacit)
.
.
.
& Kasper, Lehrer, Muhlbacher)
Muller, 2013, 328).
2011 )
( 83 (.Cho, 2011, 3 )
2000) ( %89). (124
( %85) ( %90)
( 2014 41-42 .)
,Economist Intelligence Unit) 2005, 2; Kharabsheh, Magableh, & Sawadha, 2012,
8; Hang, 2013, 628) .
. .
.
.
.
,Momeni, Monavarian, Shaabani) & Ghasemi 2011, 475).
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
577
: : -1
.(134 2011 )
(Amirkhani et al., 2012, 142 8 2004 ( Jashapara, 2011, 12) 134 2011
. : -2
& Gasik) Poland., 2011, 26).
.
,Emadzade, Mashayekhi, & Abdar 2012) ;Kotecki, 2011, 253) .(783
Amirkhani etal, 2012, 142; Emadzade et al., 2012, (783
. : -3
.
-Jashapara, 2011, 6314 2004 ) ( 89
. : -4
.
.(Golden, 2009, 152) (Amirkhani et al., 2012, 142; Golden, 2009,
(152-153 .
: -5
.
.
.
.
(Alhawari, Talet, & Al-Jarrah, 2011, 875). ;Golden, 2009, 152-153; Cho, 201 ,9)
Yang, et al., 2011, 419) . : -6
.
(Amirkhani et al., 2012, 142 Mciver, & Hall, ( 336-28 2012 185 ,2011 .
: :
.
(Anninos ,2007, 315) .
.(Banister, 2002, 50)
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
578
( )
.(367 1997 )
. (4 2007) ,
.(1 2009 ) : :
)
:(2-1 2009 .1
. .2
. .3
.
.4
.
: :
(.49 2002 )
(Ehlers, 2009, 356) :
: -1 .
: -2 .
: -3 .
: -4
.
: :
)
2009 29-70:) . : . : . : . : . :
. : . : . : . : . : . : . :
.
: :
( 2013)
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
579
(649 ) ( 390 )
) :
. ( ( 2011 )
.
.
) (
.
. (2008 )
.
( 2170) 2006/2007
.
( 2005) 240 .
. .
. ) (
. :
( Watcharadmron, 2012)
.
( 121 ) (. %76( )92 )
:
.
. (Munir & Rohindi, 2012)
. ,
. ( 80760) :
.
( Salleh & Huang, 2011)
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
580
.
( 26) . ) ( ) :
(( ) ( 99 )
.
. ((Tataru, Constantin & Doval, 2009
.
( 400) .
.
( McCarthy, 2006)
:
.
) ( : ( . 40 )
:
.
.
.
. /
. :
.
( 334 ) .
( 2567 )
.( %88.92 )( 297)
( %86.83) ( 290) ( 1 ) .( %97.64)
.
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
581
(1)
82.1 239
31.4 91 5 29.6 86 10 5 17.9 51
12.8 37 15 10 5.9 17 30 26.2 76 15 31.7 92 40 30 32.4 94 50 40
9.3 27 2.8 8 30.0 78 50
25.1 73 10.3 30 62.8 182 24.8 72 100 290 52.1 151
12.8 37 100 290
:
. . :
. : ) ( :
: )
( .
() :
.
( : ) 1-5 )( ) 3( ): 4( ): 5:
: ( ) : (
( 2.33-1):
( .5-3.67( )2.34-3.66)
( 21 )
.
:
(Cronbachs Alpha) )
(
( 0.913-0.875) ( 0.972 )
( 0.963) ( )
( .2) .
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
582
(2)
0.875 6-1 0.879 12-7 0.893 18-13
0.877 24-19 0.913 30-25 0.913 36-31
0.972 36-1 0.963 60-37
(SPSS)
: .
" : : "
( :3)
(3)
3 0.778 3.41 .1 1 0.767 3.61 .2 4 0.779 3.40 .3 2 0.803 3.43 .4 5 0.848 3.34 .5 6 0.849 3.16 .6
0.706 3.39 (706 ) (3.39 ) ( 3 )
) (3.61) ( ) . (3.17) ( ) ( 3.43( )
:
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
583
(4)
1 0.86 3.84 .1 3 0.88 3.42 .2 2 0.93 3.74 .3 6 1.09 3.09 . .4 4 1.07 3.17 . .5 5 1.09 3.16 . .6
3.41 : 1 0.88 3.77 . .7 6 1.08 3.40 . .8 4 0.98 3.60 . .9
3 0.92 3.65 . .10 5 0.96 3.50 . .11 2 0.97 3.76 . .12
3.61 : 2 0.86 3.56 . .13 . .14 1 0.91 3.61 3 0.95 3.49 . .15 6 1.16 3.05 . .16 4 0.94 3.43 . .17 5 0.94 3.29 . .18
3.40 : 2 0.93 3.53 . .19 4 0.98 3.36 . .20 1 1.03 3.71 . .21 3 1.01 3.50 . .22 6 1.05 3.16 . .23 5 1.09 3.31 . .24
3.43 : 2 0.99 3.51 . .25 6 1.12 3.23 . .26 5 1.02 3.26 . .27 3 0.98 3.37 . .28 1 0.96 3.62 . .29 4 1.02 3.33 . .30
3.34 : 1 1.03 3.28 . .31 3 0.99 3.25 . .32 4 1.02 3.22 . .33 5 1.01 3.04 . .34 6 0.99 2.93 . .35 2 1.05 3.27 . .36
3.16 :
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
584
) (4
.(3.41 )) ( " "
( 3.84 ) "
(3.09 ) " .
) ( (. " 3.61)
( 3.77" ) "
(3.40 ) " . (. 3.40 )) (
" ( 3.61" )
" (3.05 ) "
.
) ( " .(3.43 )
" " ( 3.71 )
" . (3.16 )
( ) (. " 3.34 )
" ( 3.62 )
" (3.23 ) "
(4) .(. 3.16 )) (
" "
" ( 3.28) "
. (2.93 )
" ": :
: ( 5 )
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
585
(5)
2 0.86 4.07 . .37 21 1.08 3.49 . .38 14 0.93 3.68 . .39 11 0.91 3.75 . .40 9 0.96 3.80 . .41 . .42 16 0.99 3.63 1 0.96 4.20 . ) ( .43 3 0.95 4.04 . .44 10 1.03 3.77 . .45 20 1.12 3.54 ), , ( . .46 , , , .47
4 0.99 3.91 .
, .48 6 0.97 3.88 .
19 0.95 3.54 .49 . .50 17 1.04 3.60 18 1.07 3.57 . .51 8 0.94 3.82 . .52 13 0.94 3.74 ) ( . .53 15 0.95 3.66 . .54 , , .55
, . 5 0.93 3.88
14 0.95 3.72 . , .56 .57
22 1.01 3.46 .
23 1.01 3.22 . .58 12 1.00 3.75 . .59 7 0.96 3.83 . .60
3.73 :
(5) (. 3.73 )) (
) ( " "
( 4.20 ) "
( . 4.07" ) "
" . (3.22 )
: :
1 0H : ( P (0.05
.
Stepwise multiple regression
:
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
586
(6)
ANOVA
R 2R
df F
Sig*
1 0.745 0.555 0.481 1 359.529 0.000 2 0.782 0.612 0.450 2 226.463 0.000 3 0.796 0.634 0.438 3 164.957 0.000 4 0.804 0.642 0.430 4 130.655 0.000 5 0.809 0.649 0.426 5 107.855 0.000
(6)
( ) ( ) ( 55.5%)
) ( ( ( ) ( )61.2%)
) ( ( )%63.4( )
(. )( )( )
) ( %64.2 )(. )
( ) ( ) F (
(Sig = 0.000) .
(7)
t
Sig*
0.000 18.961 0.745
0.505 0.339
9.669 6.488
0.000 0.000
0.335 0.306 0.244
5.123 5.944 4.109
0.000 0.000 0.000
0.250 0.239 0.218 0.198
3.596 4.394 3.712 2. 286
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001
0.214 0.191 0.196 0.175 0.146
3.052 3.339 3.323 2.882 2.554
0.002 0.001 0.001 0.004 0.011
(7) = Sig ) t (0.00
( 0.05 ) .
:
( P 0.05)
.
:
: .1
(. 3.39 )
( 3.61 )
. ( 3.17)
( 2012 ) .
( 2008 )
( (Watcharadmron, 2012
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
587
. ( 2005 )
)
(. 2005 .2
.
: ) (
( ) ) ( ( ( ) )
( . )
.
.3 (3.73 )
.
.4
( ) ( 55.5%
( ) ( ) ( )
( %61.2 )( ) %63.4 )
(. ( ) ( )
(.%64.7 )( %65.5 ) ( )
) ) ( (
) (
.
.
.
:
: :
.1 . .
.
.2
.
. .3
. .4
. .5
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
588
. :
.1
.
. .2
. ) ( .3
. : -1
.
-2
. -3
.
: :
( ) .1 (. 2004)
. .
" " .2 . (. 2011 )
.: (.2005 ) .3
. .
. (2014) .4 :
. : . .5
(. : 2009) .
(. 2009 ) .6.
: .(. 2013 ) .7
: .
(.1)9 .8
9001 (. 2002)ISO : .
(. 1997 ) .9
. .
(. 2012 ) .10 . .
.11. : (. 2012)
. (. 2007 ) .12
.
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
589
.
(. 2011 ) .13.
.
(. 2008 ) .14.
. (. 2000 ) .15
260 . .
: 1. Alhawari, E., Talet, A., & Al-Jarrah, M.
(2011). Development of conceptual framework for knowledge management process. Journal Of Modern Accounting And Auditing, 7(8), 864-877.
2. Amirkhani, A., Tajmirriahi, J., & Mohammad, M. (2012). Assessing the effectiveness of knowledge management in empowering and development of human resources: a case study on Ati Luleh Sepahan Company. Interdisciplinary Journal Of Contemporary Research In Business, 3(12), 131-147.
3. Anninos, N. (2007). The archetype of excellence in universities and TQM. Journal Of Management History, 13(4), 307-321.
4. Banister, A. (2002). A question of quality: the malcolm baldrige criteria as applied to education. Journal of Research for Educational Leaders (JREL), 1(2), 44-65.
5. Cheng, Eric C. K. (2012). Exploring A Personal Knowledge Management Model of Pre-Service Teachers For Effective Learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(2), 336-341.
6. Cho, T. (2011). Knowledge management capabilities and organizational performance: an investigation into the effect of knowledge infrastructure and processes or organizational performance. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois.
7. Delen, D., Zaim, H., Kuzey, C., & Zaim, S. (2013). A comparative of machine learning system for measuring the impact of knowledge management practices. Decision Support Systems, 54(2), 1150-1160.
8. Economist intelligence unit (2005). know how managing knowledge for competitive
advantage. The Economist, London, UK. Available at: www.eiu.com
9. Ehlers, Ulf Daniel (2009). Understanding quality culture. Quality Assurance In Education Journal, 17(4), 343-363.
10. Emadzade, M., Mashayekhi, B., & Abdar, E. (2012). Knowledge management capabilities and organizational performance. International Journal Of Contemporary Research In Business, 3(11), 781-790.
11. Gasik, S., Consulting, & Poland, W. (2011). A model of project knowledge management. Project Management Journal, 42(3), 23-44.
12. Golden, C. (2009). Knowledge management and historically black colleges and universities. Dessertation of Doctor of philosophy applied management science. Walden University.
13. Hang, A. (2013). Improving the design phase through interorganization product knowledge models. International Journal Of Production Research, 51(2), 626-639.
14. Jashapara, A. (2011). Knowledge Management: An Integrated Approach. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
15. Kasper, H., Lehrer, M., Muhlbacher, J. F., & Muller, B. (2013). On the different world of intra-organization knowledge management: under standing idosync-ratic variation in MNC cross-sit knowledge-sharing practices. International Business Review, 22, 326-338.
16. Kharabsheh, R., Magableh, I., & Sawadha, S. (2012). Knowledge management practices (KMPs) and its impact on organizational performance in pharmaceutical firms. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 48, 6-15.
17. Kotecki, P. (2011). Building organizational capability: A study of knowledge Management practices reasons, and Results. PhD. Dissertation, Capella University.
18. Marwick, A. (2001). Knowledge management technology. Ibm System Journal, 40(4), 814-830.
19. McCarthy, A. (2006). Knowledge management: evaluating strategies and processes used in higher education. A dissertation submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. Nova Southeastern University.
20. Mciver, D., & Hall, C. (2011). Knowledge management processes and firm performance: a contingency perspective. AMBPP, 148. Available at: www.uhv.edu/hb2504/spotlight.asp?ss=mciverUHV.
21. Momeni, M., Monavarian, A., Shaabani, E., &
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
590
Ghasemi, R. (2011). A conceptual model for knowledge management process capabilities and core competencies by SEM the call of ironman automotive industry. European Journal of Social Sciences, 22(4), 437-489.
22. Munir, & Rohindi, D. (2012). Development model for knowledge management system (KMS) to improve universitys performance (case study in Indonesia University of Education). International Journal Of Computer Science. 9(1), 1-6.
23. Salleh, K. F., & Huang, C. (2011). Learning organization, knowledge management process and organizational performance: empirical evidence forma public university. Proceedings of the international Conference on Intellectual Capital Knowledge Management, organizational learning.
24. Swoa, J., Neweu, S., Scarbrough, H., & Hislop, D. (1999). Knowledge management and innovation, networks and net. Journal of K.M., 3.
25. Tataru, Lupsa D. A., Constantin, S., & Doval, E. (2009). Developing and improving knowledge management processes in the education Sector. Bulletin of The Transilyam`a University of Brasov, 2(51), 87-90.
26. Watcharadamron, K. S. (2012). Predictors and effects of knowledge management in U.S.A Colleges and School of Pharmacy. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D., University of Wisconsin Madison.
27. Yang, Jie, Hongming Xie, & Zhuang, Yongyao (2011). The process competence of knowledge management and corporate growth. International Journal Of Industrial Engineering, 18(8), 414-424.
28. Zhang, M. (2007). An empirical assessment of the performance impact of is support for knowledge transfer, International Journal Of K.M., 3(1), 66-85.
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
591
Ghasemi, R. (2011). A conceptual model for knowledge management process capabilities and core competencies by SEM the call of ironman automotive industry. European Journal of Social Sciences, 22(4), 437-489.
22. Munir, & Rohindi, D. (2012). Development model for knowledge management system (KMS) to improve universitys performance (case study in Indonesia University of Education). International Journal Of Computer Science. 9(1), 1-6.
23. Salleh, K. F., & Huang, C. (2011). Learning organization, knowledge management process and organizational performance: empirical evidence forma public university. Proceedings of the international Conference on Intellectual Capital Knowledge Management, organizational learning.
24. Swoa, J., Neweu, S., Scarbrough, H., & Hislop, D. (1999). Knowledge management and innovation, networks and net. Journal of K.M., 3.
25. Tataru, Lupsa D. A., Constantin, S., & Doval, E. (2009). Developing and improving knowledge management processes in the education Sector. Bulletin of The Transilyam`a University of Brasov, 2(51), 87-90.
26. Watcharadamron, K. S. (2012). Predictors and effects of knowledge management in U.S.A Colleges and School of Pharmacy. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D., University of Wisconsin Madison.
27. Yang, Jie, Hongming Xie, & Zhuang, Yongyao (2011). The process competence of knowledge management and corporate growth. International Journal Of Industrial Engineering, 18(8), 414-424.
28. Zhang, M. (2007). An empirical assessment of the performance impact of is support for knowledge transfer, International Journal Of K.M., 3(1), 66-85.
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
592
/ /
[email protected] [email protected]
: ( 011. )
(3102 ) ,
. , , , , ()
. :
: . -0 . -3 -2
. . -4
.
. :Abstract The study aimed to find out accreditation in university teacher preparation institutions standards. The sample of the research (100) teaching and teaching of the capital, Baghdad universities, as used descriptive analytical method, has the researchers to adopt a questionnaire prepared by (Naimi) as a tool to gather research information, is to identify the administrative difficulties within the dependence of educational institutions standards and falls below five areas is (planning, organization, decision-making, communication, monitoring and evaluation). Where they were checking the veracity of the questionnaire has been statistically treated and extracted percentage weights to determine the necessary standards in the work of educational institutions, which are university teacher in the light of science and technology development to be included in the benefit of the work of educational institutions. Questionnaire applied to the sample and the results showed using the weighted equation and the equation of weight percentile and samples- as follows: The main difficulties in the administrative area was to:
1. The lack of university administration to the required level of technical and administrative powers in matters of scientific research and its applications planning and organization.
2. The low level of participation of Central and operational departments in the university in decisions on scientific research and industry applications.
3. Weak oversight and evaluation tools scientific activities and their applications process in spite of progress monitoring and evaluation process at the university and other administrative operations.
4. The methods and formulas and mechanisms of administrative and organizational work does not create the currently approved to stimulate scientific research and technological development, if not hampered. Recommended by the researchers at the end of search some suggestions to alleviate the difficulties faced by the teaching staff in the light of learning and technology development from their point of view.
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
593
(introduction )
, :
" " .
: .1
.2 .3 .4
(:problem background )
( 84 1002 )
(10: 2848)
.
( 211: 1004)
:
.1
. .2
.3
.4
.
: : .1
.
. .2 .3
. : )
1028-1021 ( :
( ) %20
( 1992) ( %10)
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
594
( %20 )( ) ( %10 ) ( )
) ( .( ) %5)1992 :168)
: : - ) )( ")
( ) " . ( "1002)
" . )
1002 :12) 1002 )) :- (The Higher Learning Com mission, 2002) "
The Higher Learning Com ) ". mission, 2002 :70 )
"
".
- ( ( " 2881
(208: 2881 " . )
( 1020 " )
(82: 1020 " )
( 1020 ) :-
" " . )
( 21: 1002 1002)" )
( 2: 1002 " ) 1002 )) : - ( " 1002 )
" ) (128: 1002
1020 )" ) (21 1020) "
1020 ) ) :
.
:
- : : -
) . (1002,
: -
(12: 2881).
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
595
: -
. (: )
: -
( : )
.
:
.
Moor) (30 :1993
kenneth & Tullis,
.
.
( : ) . :
.1
.
.2
. .3
. ) ( .4
( : ) :
) ( : .1
: . . ) ) . ) )
. ( . ) . : .2
: . )
) : .3
.
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
596
: ,
:
:- .
:- ( : ).
: - .
: -
. : -
.
: -
. : -
. :
. .1 . .2 . .3
:
. .1 .2
.
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
: ( " 2888) "
.
: ,
.
( )
.
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
597
.
(811-810 2888 )
" (2002 ) "
.
(11-81 1001)
:
: - : : -1
: -
( 1 )
1
.2.875
71.875
71.875 2.875 . 2 71.250 2.850 . 3 70.000 2.800 4 69,06 2,07 . 5 64.375 2.575 6 63.750 2.550 7 59,5 1,78 . 8 59,03 1,77 . 9 58,9 1,76 10 . 11 57,5 1,72 57,4 1,72 12 57,1 1,71 . 13 56,6 1,69 . 14 55,1 1,65 15 54,2 1,62 . 16 53,7 1,61 . 17
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
598
53,3 1,60 . 18 52,7 1,58 . 19 51,9 1,55 . 20 50,6 1,52 . 21 48,9 1,46 . 22 47,6 1,42 . 23
.
: - ( 2 )
69,4 2,08 1 68,5 2,05 2 66,4 1,99 3 65,7 1,97 5 62,8 1,88 . 6 61,3 1,84 7 60,4 1,81 8 60,2 1,80 . 9
59,1 1,77 10 57,7 1,73 11 57,03 1,71 . 12 55,7 1,67 . 13 55 1,65 . 14 54,1 1,62 15 54,2 1,62 . 16 52,3 1,57 . 17 52,2 1,56 . 18 50,6 1,52 . 19 50,3 1,50 . 20 47,1 1,41 . 21 46,6 1,39 . 22
: -
( 3 )
71.250 2.850 . 1 70.000 2.800 2 69,06 2,07 . 3 64.375 2.575 . 4 63.750 2.550 . 5 62,9 1,88 6 61,8 1,85 . 7 61,3 1,84 . 8 61,3 1,84 . 9
60,7 1,82 . 10 60,5 1,81 . 11 60,4 1,81 . 12
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
599
60,2 1,80 . 13 59,8 1,79 . 14 59,03 1,77 . 15 59,03 1,77 . 16 58,3 1,74 . 17 57,2 1,71 . 18 56,1 1,68 19 54,7 1,64 . 20 54,6 1,63 . 21 54,1 1,62 . 22
.
:-
( 4 ) 64 1,92 1 62,6 1,87 2 62,4 1,87 3 61,2 1,83 . 4
60,8 1,82 . 5
59,5 1,78 . 6
59,03 1,77 . 7
8 58,9 1,76 .
57,5 1,72 . 9
57,1 1,71 10 56,7 1,70 . 11 56,5 1,69 . 12
13 55,7 1,67 .
55 1,65 . 14 53,9 1,61 . 15
. : -
( 1 )
72.500 2.900 . 1 71.875 2.875 . 2 71.875 2.875 . 3 66.875 2.675 . 4 64.375 2.575 5 63.750 2.550 . 6 61.250 2.450 . 7 60,9 1,82 . 8
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
600
60,2 1,80 . 9 59,1 1,77 . 10 57,7 1,73 11 57,03 1,71 . 12 55,7 1,67 13 55 1,65 . 14 54,2 1,62 . 15 52,3 1,57 16 52,3 1,57 . 17 52,2 1,56 18
50,6 1,52 . 19
"
, .
: (2
.
(1
. (1
. (8
.
(1 .
(1 .
(2
. : :
. (2
(1 .
(1
. (8
(1
. (1
. (2
. (4
. (8
. (20
. (22 (21
. (21
. (28
: (1
. (2
.
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
601
(3
. (4
.
:
.
: (1002) -1
. 2 ( 2990 ) -2
. (1020 ) -3
2 .
(2991) -4 .
" (2991) -5 .
( 1001) -6
. (2991) -7
81-65 .
(2999,) -8 " .26
(2995) ________ -9
.32 ( 1001) -11
. 6
( 1008 ) -11 2
. (1002 ) -12
.
(: 2918 ) -13
2 .
(1002 ) -14 .
- () -15 . ,2
(2991) -16
.11-10
( ) -17 2 .
(1020) -18 2
. (2991) -19
.9-5
(: " 1022 ) -21
) ( . /
(2991 ) -21
. (2913 ) -22
23- The Higher Learning, (2002): Proposed New
Criteria for Accreditation A commission of The
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
602
North Central Association of Colleges and School Chicago.
24- Moor, Kenneth, D. Hopkins and Tullis, Ricahrd: NCATE Accreditation: Vision of Excellence, Journal of research and development in Education, Vol. 27, No. 1, 1993.
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
603
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
604
. .
:
( " 051 )
( 0.05 )
:
. Abstract This study aims to identify the perception of a proposal to develop the quality of study plans for the Palestinian postgraduate programmes in the Gaza Strip universities. The importance of the study is to draw the attention of officials in the Palestinian universities as this study plays a positive role in promoting the academic level. Based on the nature and objectives of this study which seeks to achieve, the researchers used the descriptive analytical method to study and describe accurately and express it in a qualitative and quantitative way. The study sample consists of students in the Palestinian universities enrolled in postgraduate programmes and their number is 150 female and male students. A questionnaire was developed about a perception for developing the quality of study plans in postgraduate programs in light of recent global trends. The study found the following results: There were no significant differences at the level significance ( 0.05) between the views of respondents in the perception of a proposal to develop the quality of the study plans in postgraduate programmes in light of recent global trends attributed to the programme for the benefit of those studying in the education programme. The Palestinian postgraduate students suffers from poor coordination and integration in contributing in structure of departments in colleges, this is related to the non-participation in all departments related to the topic of development. The study reached the following recommendations: There is a need for carrying out specialized courses for faculty members and university students to illustrate the development concepts. There is a need to work on reviewing the ongoing and periodic plans for postgraduate studies to determine the efficiency and effectiveness of these programs and plans. There is a need to allocate an independent budget to review the curricula of the postgraduate studies in order to facilitate access to physical and human capabilities required from administration and other departments at the university. There is a need to provide cadres who have high efficiency and expertise among the authors of plans to prepare possible scenarios for the development of curricula and plans constantly.
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
605
. :
:
,
(76: 3112) .
(51 :3112) .
.
.
.
.
.
(55: 3112).
)
( 55: 3113
.
:
.
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
606
.
.
.
,
.
:
: -
:
-
-
-
-
-
:
: :
).05)
:
: ).05)
: ).05)
: ). 05)
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
607
: ). 05)
:
).05)
.05 ) :
)
) ( : :
-
. -
. -
. -
. -
.
- .
: -
. -
-
. -
.
-
. :
: -
.
:
(65: 3111 )
:
.85:2006 )) :
( . : 0555.) :
) (
:
(72: 3115)
:
.
( : 75: 3115 )
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
608
()
()
()
:
. ( 0555 )
( 53 )
( 3115 ) ,
( 51 , )
( 01%) : , , , ,
,
.
( 3115 )
:
.( 3115 )
.
( 3110 )
( 370 )
: , , ,
, .( 3101 )
.
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
609
( ) "
( )
( ( ))
. ( )
"
-
. :
- .
-
. -
. ,
: -
.
- .
3105 : - : -
.
-
. -
. -
.
-
. :
.0
.
.3
.2
.5
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
610
. .5
. .7
. .6
. .0
: : .0
: 3115 )
05.) : .3
. : .2
.5
: .5
: .7 .
: .6 ..
:
.0 .
.3 .
.2 .
: : .0
. (Roberts, 1985 21)
: )( .3
.(75: 3110): -
(05: 3115) -
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
611
(55: 3115) -
(70: 3112) : -
.
: .0
.
: .3 .
: .2
. : .5
. : .5
.
.
.
- .
. - -
-
(3: 3115) .
- .
- .
-
. -
.
-
. -
. -
. -
. -
. -
. -
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
612
:
,
,
. :
: .0
. : .3
( 051 ) 3105
: -
. ( 051 ) :
(051) .
: - "
: . :
(51) : : 5 ( 10 ) :
.
. ( .10)
. : ( .10 )
: ( .10)
: ( .10 )
(:0 )
(: 0 )
5 4 3 2 1
( " " 1 ) %20
. : -
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS)
Normality Distribution Test ( (K-S -
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
(.3 ) (2 )
(Sig.) 0.479 : .1
2. ,
0.768 .
3. :
0.446 .
4. :
.0.227
5. :
0.926
0.368 ( 3 )
(Sig.) 0.05
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
613
.
: -
. : Reliability -
.
- : Reliability -
. :
:Cronbach's Alpha Coefficient . (5 )
*
0.960 0.921 10 : .6
7. ,
.
10 0.899 0.948
8. :
.
10 0.916 0.957
9. :
.
10 0.913 0.955
0.940 0.884 10 : .11
0.988 0.975 50
* = ( 5 )
( . 0.8840.921)
(. 0.975 )
( . 0.9400.960)( 0.988 )
. :
- , T
( .
)( ( : )
3 )( .
Sig . 3 : > 0.05 (Sig 0.05 ( )SPSS )
Sig
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
614
(22 ) " (.Sig)
(
Si
g).
7 *0.016 3.97 73.33 3.94 .0
3 *0.002 3.64 76.67 4.67 . .3
9 *0.000 2.97 70.10 4.00 . .2 5 *0.000 4.32 74.95 3.39 . .5 8 *0.000 3.57 71.38 3.67 . .5 10 *0.011 3.67 69.97 4.97 . .7 1 *0.017 4.99 79.67 3.29 . .6 6 *0.003 4.88 73.68 3.67 . .0 2 *0.000 3.09 78.94 3.88 . .5
4 *0.000 3.61 75.00 3.30 . .01 *0.000 3.98 74.27 3.66
0.05 * . ( :22 )
" - 3.29 .
( 5) ( Sig ).4.99 %79.67
0.000 0.05
2 )(
.
" -
%69.97 4.97 0.011 ( Sig ). 3.67
0.05
3 )(
. :
).05)
T
. 3 )( (.21 )
-
IACQA2015 3-5 //2015
615
(21 ) (.Sig)
(
Si
g).
5 *0.000 7.20 65.11 2.73 .0 2 0.000* 5.26 65.26 5.70 . .3 0 *0.000 7.76 61.00 2.76 .2 0 0.000* 4.28 65.55 2.10 . .5 5 0.000* 6.67 62.51 5.76 . .5 6 *0.000 4.25 60.02 2.76 . .7
75.55 2.76 .6-
2.11 0.018* 5
7 *0.000 5.75 63.30 5.33 . .0 01 *0.000 6.76 70.23 3.36 .5
.01 3 *0.000 5.06 67.56 2.00 . *0.000 5.68 65.22 3.46
0.05* . ( :02 )
" -) 2.10
%65.55( 5 0.000( Sig, ).4.28
0.05
2 )(
.
" - 3.36 "
, 6.76 %70.23 0.018( Sig ).
0.05
3)(
. :
). 05)
T
. 3 )( (21 )
-
IACQA'2015 3-5 //2015
616
(21 ) . (.Sig)
(
Si
g).
3 *0.000 6.29 78.33 2.35 .0 6 0.000* 6.37 73.99 2.76 . .3 9 *0.000 8.70 69.67 2.30 . .2 1 *0.000 5.47 80.11 5.26 . .5 8 0.128 2.37 70.67 2.76 .5 4 0.000* 5.67 75.64 2.16 . .7 5 0.019* 3.54 74.39 2.76 . .6 2 0.000* 4.44 79.37 2.05 .0
10 *0.000 4.31