bd6893c0ea1f11e3ac58f1ef7e6ec0e4

Upload: jotdeep-singh

Post on 03-Jun-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 bd6893c0ea1f11e3ac58f1ef7e6ec0e4

    1/3

    The first argument:

    All too often businesses attempt to control the creative processes. That doesnt work. Creativity can be

    allocated, it can be budgeted, it can be measured, it can be tracked and encouraged, but it cant be

    dictated.i

    To accomplish value creation through innovation a person has to remember the words of Francis Bacon,

    who was, after all, the father of the scientific method: We must obey the forces we want to command.

    Two and half centuries after Bacon, Charles Darwin describedthe evolution of life with his theory of

    natural selection but was unable to come up with the mechanism of genetic variations that drove

    evolution.ii Darwin initially believed in 1859 in The Origin of Speciesthat an offsprings new traits were

    created by simply mixing the traits of its parents.

    A decade later when The Variation of Animals and Plants

    under Domesticationwas published he came up with yet

    another mechanism based on cellular seeds but it was

    Gregor Mendel who in 1866 managed to create modern

    genetics through the laws of inheritance passed down by

    genes from one generation to the next.

    Had Darwin read about Mendels work, as Mendel had read

    Darwins, Darwin would have been able to synthesize his

    theory of natural selection with Mendels theory of random genetic inheritance. Unfortunately,

    Mendels work existed in obscurity until the early 20th century when it was rediscovered.iii

    As managers or as innovators we should not get in the way by discouraging ideas because we mustobey the forces we want to command since, in the long run, as with nature, the best ideas will win and

    the others will fail.

    In a Darwinian process for

    weeding out the bad ideas, youwill do best by encouraging all of

    them. The best will win and the

    others will fail.

    Rosenberg

  • 8/12/2019 bd6893c0ea1f11e3ac58f1ef7e6ec0e4

    2/3

    The second argument:

    Descartes came up with the notion of splitting the mind and the body, to split problems into little pieces

    to solve sub problems and then to recombine them.iv

    While splitting is sometimes a good approach for problem solving, when it comes to realizing the

    fullness of what is possible, we must obey the forces we want to command if we want to see and

    understand a little further, to experience a bigger universe and not merely the circumstances of our

    present storythen we have to try and see the way Francis Bacon did:

    Special care is to be taken that it be of wide range and made to the measure of the universe. For

    the world is not to be narrowed till it will go into the understanding (which has been done

    hitherto), but the understanding is to be expanded and opened until it can take in the image of

    the world.v

    This is easier said than done. We take shots in the dark about our circumstances because living with

    uncertainty is a hard struggle. Instead, since, we cant live in a state of perpetual doubt, we make upthe best story possible and we live as if the story were true.

    vi

    Nevertheless, if we want to grow and change in the decades that l ie ahead of

    us, solving some interesting problems along the way, then the best way

    forward is to approach uncertainty with excitement.

    In order to do that it is helpful to think as Francis Bacon did and not shrink

    our universe into separate disciplines, distinct from one another, but instead

    to realize that the world is made up of science and history and philosophy and business and books and

    nature and everything else combined.

    We cant live in a state of

    perpetual doubt, so we make

    up the best story possible and

    we live as if the story were

    true.

    Kahneman

  • 8/12/2019 bd6893c0ea1f11e3ac58f1ef7e6ec0e4

    3/3

    End Notes

    iJonathan Rosenberg 42 Rules to Lead by from the Man Who Defined Googles Product Strategy

    ii http://instruct.uwo.ca/anthro/222/darwin.htm.

    iiihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_selection

    ivLuc de Brabandere On Strategy : What Managers Can Learn from Great Philosophers

    vhttp://www.intratext.com/IXT/ENG1061/_P5.HTM

    vi"Brilliant Blunders: From Darwin to Einstein. Colossal Mistakes by Great Scientists That Changed Our

    Understanding of Life and the Universe. By Mario Livio."

    http://instruct.uwo.ca/anthro/222/darwin.htmhttp://instruct.uwo.ca/anthro/222/darwin.htmhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_selectionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_selectionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_selectionhttp://www.intratext.com/IXT/ENG1061/_P5.HTMhttp://www.intratext.com/IXT/ENG1061/_P5.HTMhttp://www.intratext.com/IXT/ENG1061/_P5.HTMhttp://www.intratext.com/IXT/ENG1061/_P5.HTMhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_selectionhttp://instruct.uwo.ca/anthro/222/darwin.htm