bsc 하에서의 개인성과 평가방안 : 선진국과 국내자치단체의 사례를...

Click here to load reader

Upload: keelty

Post on 25-Jan-2016

60 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

BSC 하에서의 개인성과 평가방안 : 선진국과 국내자치단체의 사례를 중심으로. 2008.7. 이 석 환 국민대학교 행정학과. 바람직한 조직의 모습 ( 성과평가의 궁극적 목적 ). - 효과성 : 옳은 일을 하는 것 (Doing the right things) - 효율성 : 일을 옳게 하는 것 (Doing the job right) - 옳은 일을 옳게 하는 것 (Doing the right job right). 평가의 의미. - BSC 하에서의 평가의 궁극적 대상 ? 업무 Vs. 전략 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

  • BSC : 2008.7.

  • ( )

    - : (Doing the right things)

    - : (Doing the job right)

    - (Doing the right job right)

  • - BSC ? Vs.

    - =

    -

    - ,

  • VFO (Value Focused Organization)

    -

    - Happy Worker

    -

    -

  • UOFO (Unreasonable Objectives-Focused Organization)

    -

    -

    - (Organizational Alignment)

    - ,

    - ()

    -

  • CKPI ( )

    -

    - (CKPI: Comprehensive Key Performance Index)

    CKPI= + + CSF +

  • BSC

    BSC

    PRD (Performance Review & Development)

    PRD ( + )

    BSC PRD Process

  • Performance Review and Development

    (Guiding Principles) ()- , , ,

  • PRD Process

    Feedback-//

    - Shared Responsibility-

  • (Performance Plan)-

    -

    (Repetitive Objectives) - results obtained from data/records

    (Project Oriented Objectives) - results based on success of a mutually agreed upon action plan

  • -

    6

  • Midyear Appraisal Feedback Sessions (1) ,

  • : Exceptional Performance consistently exceeded job requirements/produced superior and unique results.

    Exceeded Expectations Frequently exceeded job requirements.

    Achieved Expectations Met and occasionally exceeded job requirements.

    Marginal Performance Did not consistently meet or only met minimum job requirements; performance needs improvement.

    Unacceptable Performance Rarely met or did not meet job requirements; placed on Performance Probation.

  • comment

  • :

    : , ,

    : , ,

    /

  • - Principle of No Surprise

    - ,

  • Market Rate Information : - Market Rate - (- Exceeding- 1.5%, Outstanding- 3.5%)

  • -

    -

    - :

    -

  • -

    -

    -

  • (Employee Development Plans)

    , - ,

  • ( ) BSC

    KBU () , )

  • - ( ) BSC PRD

    Guiding Principle

  • BSC - CKPI ( )- : CSF / - UOFO ( )- (DBSC ) BSC , 6 PRD - guiding principle (, , )

  • DBSC (Double Balanced Scorecard)

    ,, , , (,) / , ,

  • CKPI ()

  • //// ( : )- (Outcome) (Objectives) (Goals) , (Value)Feedback ()

  • () 1( )( + ) 2( ) () 1( , ) 2( ) , ,

  • Feedback - (Outcome)

  • : , - ()

    Chart2

    6.04

    6.32

    6.32

    6.33

    6.15

    6.36

    5.94

    Chart1

    6.04

    6.32

    6.32

    6.33

    6.15

    6.36

    5.94

    Sheet1

    N

    x122091105.831.6605144667

    w122091105.871.7142281113

    w222061105.721.6976978716

    w322061105.441.7331627232

    w422091105.381.7604072483

    w522111105.381.6866999211

    w622101105.311.7270926612

    ()2193

    9482.22.299.5

    120.50.5100.0

    221099.5100.0

    110.5

    2221100.0

    123456

    6.046.326.326.336.156.365.94

    123456

    6.046.326.326.336.156.365.940.02.20.5

    0.06040.06320.06320.06330.06150.06360.059400.0217194570.0054298643

    Sheet1

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • 1 : 2 : 3 : 4 : 5 : 6 : 7 : 8 : 9 : 10 : -

    Chart1

    3.47

    3.64

    3.65

    3.79

    3.64

    3.7

    3.6

    3.55

    3.6

    3.53

    Sheet1

    N

    12082153.460.9132402469

    22118153.410.9170502043

    31911153.350.8919103777

    42005153.560.9631843556

    52089153.380.9313934455

    62106153.241.0030426537

    72087153.360.9377657371

    82129153.320.945374286

    92047153.380.9539515385

    102001153.360.8891938299

    111985153.410.9263815861

    ()1575

    12345678910

    3.473.643.653.793.643.73.63.553.63.53

    Sheet1

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • 2006 5.32 2007 6.32

    - 2006 3.35 2007 3.64 - 2006 3.21 2007 3.52 - 2006 3.15 2007 3.55 -

  • .

    -()-

    9

    - Cross Functional Organization/UOFO

  • ()

    2007

    - BSC : (%) ( , )12

    (65)(50)(10)(5)(5)(5) (3)(2)

  • SA+AB+BC61~6556~6059~5554~5049~454410%20%30%20%20%10%(9)-(0.9)2(1.8)3(2.7)2(1.8)2(1.8)-(0.9)

  • THE END

    [email protected]

    Employees should be involved in developing their targets/objectivesEmployees and supervisors need ongoing communication on status of targets and achievementsEmployees need to work on feedback from supervisorsEmployees and supervisors share responsibility for ensuring appraisals are completed on time

    Supervisors are encouraged to hold frequent feedback sessions with employees as neededAt least a brief mid-year session with employee is necessary to ensure employee is on tract with achievement of targets; to revise targets if needed; to counsel with employees to improve performance

    responsible for ensuring: employees are treated fairly and consistentlyassisting supervisor in resolving problemssupervisors complete appraisals on timereviewing final appraisals and ratings prior to supervisors discussion with employeereviewing employee comments on appraisals and taking action as needed

    In order to maximize the effectiveness of the discussion on the employees performance evaluation, it is recommended that supervisors:separate the discussion on the merit increase amount from the discussion on performancedo not enter the merit increase amount on the PRD until after the performance discussion.inform employees of the merit increase at a later date

    Performance Probation PeriodEmployee performance Needs Improvement,Unacceptable PerformanceCan result in termination