v2n2_frucht

8/11/2019 v2n2_frucht

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/v2n2frucht 1/10

CTSJ 2:2 (Fall 1996) p. 9

The Toronto Phenomenon

(Part 2 of 2)

—

Arnold G. Fruchtenbaum, Ph.D. *

Chafer Theological Seminary

[*Editor’s note: Arnold Fruchtenbaum received a B.A. degree fromCedarville College, a Th.M. from Dallas Theological Seminary,

and a Ph.D. from New York University. He is the founder and co-

director of Ariel Ministries, Tustin, CA, a ministry to Jewish

people around the world. Arnold is also an adjunct professor atChafer Theological Seminary. He holds Bible conferences around

the globe. Dr. Fruchtenbaum’s bi-annual five-week study of Israelis accepted for credit at CTS.]

Introduction

In Part 1 of this two part series, Dr. Fruchtenbaum pointed out that he is not

dealing with a Pentecostal/Charismatic vs. Non-Pentecostal/non-Charismatic

issue because the so-called Toronto Phenomenon causes division even withinPentecostal and Charismatic circles.

He then revealed two of the chief characteristics of the Toronto Phenomenon:uncontrollable laughter and animal noises. With that background, Arnold turnedto Scripture. The heart of his discussion is “The Holy Scriptures: The Only

Authority to Validate Biblical and Spiritual Truth.” Part one concluded with

insightful passages from the Old Testament, particularly Isaiah, that show how far

the Toronto experience departs from God’s Word. He now turns to the NewTestament.

The Book of Acts

The thing you find Scripture emphasizing is that the final authority must be

the Scriptures, the written Word of God, and not anyone’s experience. Certainly,the Apostles could have related many of their experiences with Jesus in trying to

defend their preaching about Jesus. One thing the Book of Acts keeps re-emphasizing is that Paul, Silas and the others always made their final authority the

Word of God and not their own experiences, as incredible as those experiences

were by God’s grace.

8/11/2019 v2n2_frucht


Now when they had passed through Amphipolis and Apollonia,

they came to Thessalonica, where was a synagogue of the Jews:and Paul, as his custom was, went in unto them, and for three

Sabbath days reasoned with them from the scriptures, opening and

alleging that it behooved the Christ to suffer, and to rise again from

the dead; and that this Jesus, whom, said he, I proclaim unto you,is the Christ. And some of them were persuaded, and consorted

with Paul and Silas; and of the devout Greeks a great multitude,

and of the chief women not a few (Acts 17:1–4).

By and large, one does not find Paul using his personal experiences, especiallyhis key experience on Damascus Road, as a tool for evangelizing. For Paul, the

final authority had to be the Scriptures and not his own experience or testimonyand, therefore, that was the focus of his evidence and that is what convinced so

many. Those who came to believe (17:4) did not do so because of any signs and

wonders they saw Paul perform, but rather because of how he expounded the

written Scriptures and showed how Jesus fulfilled the necessary Scriptures.

The two times recorded where Paul does give his personal account as to howhe became a believer on the road to Damascus is used as part of his defense when

he is on trial. You do not find him using it in a situation in which his goal wasevangelism. I want to make it clear that I am not opposed to personal testimonies

and I do share my own testimony quite frequently. What I am saying is that my

testimony can never be a final authority, nor can anyone else’s. Furthermore, people who have converted to other religions--be it Mormonism, Jehovah’s

Witnesses or Christian Science--may also give powerful testimonies of how their

lives have changed. That is why, here again, the final authority and criteria has to

be the written Word of God. Testimonies, I believe, are primarily valuable forencouragement and edification of fellow believers, but they can never be the final

evidence of the authenticity of one’s claims or beliefs.

Another example is Acts 18:28:

For he powerfully confuted the Jews, and that publicly, showing bythe scriptures that Jesus was the Christ.

This speaks of Apollos and all that he had to say was also based on that whichwas written. The refutation of the unbelievers was not based upon signs and

wonders, but on Scripture.

One more example may be found in Acts 28:23–24:

And when they had appointed him a day, they came to him into his

lodging in great number; to whom he expounded the matter,

testifying the kingdom of God, and persuading them concerningJesus, both from the law of Moses and from the prophets, from

8/11/2019 v2n2_frucht


morning till evening. And some believed the things which were

spoken, and some disbelieved.

Here, again, what Paul used was not experience or signs and wonders. Whathe used was Scripture. His whole focus was on the Law and the Prophets, the

written Scriptures of that day, to authenticate what he was teaching and preaching.The response was that some believed and some disbelieved, but those who did believe came to believe on the basis of the exposition of the written Word of God.

The Apostle Peter

Besides what we see in the Book of Acts, a good example where the focuswas on the Scriptures and not on experience is what Peter says:

For we did not follow cunningly devised fables, when we madeknown unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ,

but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty. For he received from

God the Father honor and glory, when there was borne such avoice to him by the Majestic Glory, This is my beloved Son, in

whom I am well pleased: and this voice we ourselves heard borne

out of heaven, when we were with him in the holy mount. And wehave the word of prophecy made more sure; where unto ye do well

that ye take heed, as unto a lamp shining in a dark place, until the

day dawn, and the day-star arise in your hearts: knowing this first,that no prophecy of scripture is of private interpretation. For no

prophecy ever came by the will of man: but men spoke from God,

being moved by the Holy Spirit (2 Peter 1:16–21).

Peter describes his experience at the Transfiguration when he saw the brightness of the Shechinah Glory manifested through Christ and heard the voice

out of heaven saying, “This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased”

(1:16–18). Indeed, Peter’s experience on the Mount of Transfiguration was one ofthe highlights in that period of his life when he was with Jesus as a disciple. As

convincing as the Transfiguration experience might have been to Peter, he points

out that a far more authoritative base for believing that Jesus was the Messiah(and that this was not “cunningly devised fables”) is the Scriptures (1:19–21).

Therefore, the written Scripture itself is what really made Peter’s faith “more

sure.”

Peter does not encourage his readers to focus on Peter’s

CTSJ 2:2 (Fall 1996) p. 10

experience on the Transfiguration, but rather on the Word of God. And it is the

Scriptures, he says, that “ ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a lamp shining in a

dark place.” What makes the Scriptures truly the final authority and the basis for“more sure” doctrine than experience is the fact that the Scriptures were not

8/11/2019 v2n2_frucht


produced by the will of man, but are the product of the Holy Spirit who moved

the writers to write exactly what he wanted them to record. Because the writtenWord of God is the ultimate product of the Holy Spirit the “word of prophecy [is]

made more sure.”

Neither Peter’s great experience at the Mount of Transfiguration, nor Paul’sgreat experience on the Damascus Road, ever became the final authority for thefaith of either. The final issue for both men was the written Word of God.

What about Signs and Wonders?

The response of some is: Isn’t the manifestation of the supernatural theevidence that this is a work of God, even if it is not found in Scripture? And arenot signs and wonders the evidence of the work of God, even if the specific signs

and wonders are not found in Scripture? Here, again, the answer is a decisive

“no,” as the following two Scriptures again show. The first is Matthew 7:22–23:

Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy by your name, and by your name cast out demons, and by your

name do many mighty works? And then will I profess unto them, I

never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

One should notice what these false teachers were able to do in the name of acounterfeit Jesus. Obviously, when they say they did it “in your name,” it means

that they did use the name of Jesus and probably used it quite frequently. Nodoubt, it was their so frequent use of Jesus’ name that deceived a great many.

Furthermore, they were able to do three specific things: “ prophesy” events which

did come to pass; “cast out demons;” and, do “many mighty works,” such as

miracles of healing and other signs and wonders. Yet, “in that day,” Jesus said tothem: “ I never knew you.” Here, you have all the ingredients of some of the things

that are happening in Toronto, Kansas City, and elsewhere. The name of Jesus is

heavily used in almost ritual-mantra style, all kinds of signs and wonders areclaimed to occur, and yet, by themselves, these things do not prove anything

because Satan can duplicate these. Here, again, it is important to get back to the

written Word of God as the final criteria, the final source of authority, and thefinal foundation for all matters of faith and practice.

The Beguiling Serpent

Another example of this same area is 2 Corinthians 11:3–4 and 13–15:

But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve in his

craftiness, your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity andthe purity that is toward Christ. For if he that comes preaches

another Jesus, whom we did not preach, or if ye receive another

spirit, which ye did not receive, or another gospel, which ye did

not accept, ye do well to bear with him. . . . For such men are false

8/11/2019 v2n2_frucht


apostles, deceitful workers, fashioning themselves into apostles of

Christ. And no marvel; for even Satan fashions himself into anangel of light. It is no great thing therefore if his ministers also

fashion themselves as ministers of righteousness; whose end shall

be according to their works.

Paul emphasizes the fact that just as Satan was able to deceive Eve, even the believers of the Corinthian Church can also be deceived by Satan, perhaps not

directly by Satan as Eve was, but certainly by Satan’s ministers (11:3). It should

be kept in mind that the Corinthian Church was a church highly involved insensationalism, signs and wonders, and the experiential. Because the Corinthian

Church based so much about their lives on experience and the supernatural, that is

what opened them up for deception by false teachers.

Paul labels three things by the word “another” (11:4): “another Jesus;another gospel ; another spirit .” The Greek, however, has two different words

involved here, both of which mean “another,” but they carry a slightly differentshade of meaning. The first term means, “another of the same kind”; and, the

second term means, “another of a different kind.” If we are to render verse four a

bit more literally from the Greek, it would read as follows:

For if he that comes preaches another Jesus of the same kind,

whom we did not preach, or if ye receive another spirit of adifferent kind, which ye did not receive, or another gospel of a

different kind, which ye did not accept, ye do well to avoid him.

What Paul says is that the gospel being presented is another gospel of a

“different kind,” and the source is another spirit of a “different kind.” However,the Jesus being presented is another Jesus of the “same kind”; a Jesus that sounds

like and seems like the Jesus of the New Testament, but is a carefully-disguised

counterfeit.

It should be noted that the name being used to foster the work of deception isthe name of Jesus. It is a counterfeit Jesus, but it is a carefully-disguised

counterfeit so that one who does not judge by the Word of God is very easilydeceived. Paul makes it clear that those who are propagating another Jesus are

“ false apostles” (11:13); however, that is not the way they appear because they

fashion themselves to sound like, seem like, and act like real ministers of Christ.

By so doing, they are reflecting their true lord, Satan, who is the angel of “thisdarkness” (Eph. 6:12) by fashioning himself to appear as “an angel of light”

(11:14). Paul says that this should not be surprising for if Satan will fashion

himself to appear as an angel of light, certainly his own ministers will fashionthemselves to appear as ministers of righteousness; but, in the end, they will

receive their judgment (11:15).

8/11/2019 v2n2_frucht


Again, Satan would not be very successful in his work of deception, especially

with believers, if his ministers were clearly and without question “out in far leftfield.” And to carry out the work of deception, they must certainly focus on the

name of Jesus and not on some other name. Yet the mere usage of the name

“Jesus,” even in the context of words like “praise,” “glory,” etc., does not and

should not authenticate anyone’s ministry. Here, again, our final authority must bethe Scriptures and not experience, signs and wonders, unusual activities, or

strange noises.

Seducing spirits

The strange phenomenon going on today, such as the Toronto Phenomenon,should not have surprised people who are truly into the Word, for in 1 Timothy

4:1, Paul declared:

But the Spirit says expressly, that in later times some shall fall

away from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines

of demons.

There is, of course, biblical doctrine, but, here, Paul talks about the fact that

Satan has his own system of doctrine--referred to as “doctrines of demons.” Thosewho become enamored with “doctrines of demons” end up “ giving heed to

seducing spirits.” What are these doctrines of demons? They are such doctrines

that are coming out of Toronto and elsewhere, which find no basis in the writtenWord of God. They are based on teachers claiming to have received special,

divine revelation from God that, therefore, must be accepted as new truth.

Those who involve themselves in such “doctrines of demons” end up being

seduced by demonic spirits. Again, there are those who will come and defendthese actions based upon how happy, good, or

CTSJ 2:2 (Fall 1996) p. 11

joyful they feel, assuming that such good feelings must be of the Lord. But all thisshows is that they have, indeed, been seduced by demons. Again, Satan would not

be very successful in his program of deception if his strategy was to make people

feel bad. That is not going to attract much of an audience. What will attract anaudience is people who can do things to make you feel good, even if the feeling is

nothing more than an emotional release. Yet if the feeling can be ascribed to a

supernatural work of God, the recipient has been deceived.

Biblical Boundaries

The Bible itself gives us a major admonition by which we must judge all thatclaims to be of the Lord: the written Word of God. In concluding this study, we

will look at two key passages. The first is 1 Corinthians 4:6:

8/11/2019 v2n2_frucht


Now these things, brethren, I have in a figure transferred to myself

and Apollos for your sakes; that in us ye might learn not to go beyond the things which are written; that no one of you be puffed

up for the one against the other.

Again, it should be emphasized that Paul says this to a church that had astrong tendency to move towards the sensational and the experiential. Chapters12–14 make it clear that the Corinthian Church was by far the most

Pentecostal/Charismatic of any church we have in the New Testament. They

certainly emphasized the gifts of the Spirit in a way we do not read about in theother epistles to other churches. The focus on the experiential showed that they

were not spiritual but carnal (1 Cor. 3:1–3). Paul must especially admonish a

church of this nature “not to go beyond the things which are written.” That whichis written, of course, is the Holy Scriptures. For any new manifestation or

phenomenon, they must go back and test it by the Word of God. The fact is that

the laughing and animal noise phenomena are found nowhere in Scripture. It is

something that goes beyond that which is written and must be rejected out ofhand.

One does not need to take a plane trip to Toronto to “experience” whether or

not something is of God. It is sufficient to know that it is not in Scripture; theyhave gone beyond that which is written and, therefore, it is already evident that

these things are not of God. And what happens to those who go beyond that which

is written? Paul declares that they become “ puffed up for the one against theother .” They develop a spiritual pride that is evident when they go around

claiming to have a greater measure of the Holy Spirit than other believers. As a

result, they divide all believers into two categories: those who have “it,” and those

who do not. I guess I am one who does not have “it.” For that, I am glad, becausethe “it” is not found in Scripture. After observing and talking with so many who

claim to have “it,” I have not been provoked to jealousy to desire it in any way. I

am quite content with the spirituality described in Scripture--striving to attain it,using the Word and nothing else.

There is one more Scripture that must be dealt with in this discussion, and that

is 2 Timothy 3:12–4:4:

Yea, and all that would live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution. But evil men and impostors shall wax worse and

worse, deceiving and being deceived. But you abide in the things

which you have learned and have been assured of, knowing of

whom you have learned them; and that from a babe you haveknown the sacred writings which are able to make you wise unto

salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. Every scripture

inspired of God is also profitable for teaching, for reproof, forcorrection, for instruction which is in righteousness; that the man

of God may be complete, furnished completely unto every good

8/11/2019 v2n2_frucht


work. I charge you in the sight of God, and of Christ Jesus, who

shall judge the living and the dead, and by his appearing and hiskingdom: preach the word; be urgent in season, out of season;

reprove, rebuke, exhort, with all longsuffering and teaching. For

the time will come when they will not endure the sound doctrine;

but, having itching ears, will heap to themselves teachers after theirown lusts; and will turn away their ears from the truth, and turn

aside unto fables.

Paul gives a simple message that is largely ignored by much of the modernmovements today: that those who seek to live godly in this life will suffer

persecution (3:12). In today’s prevalent preaching of “name it and claim it” and a

“health and wealth” gospel, you do not find the preachers warning that those whoreally want to live spiritual, godly lives in accordance with Scripture will endure

persecution. The truth is that it is not health and wealth that are a sign of divine

favor or spirituality. Rather, it is being persecuted for the faith that is a sign of a

truly godly person.

Paul, then, issues a warning that as time goes on there will be more and morefalse teachers, who are truly impostors and will go around deceiving others, many

of whom will be deceived themselves (3:13). They may well believe that they are“God’s anointed” and keep repeating it to their critics, but the fact remains that

they have become deceived themselves and, therefore, proceed to deceive others

as well.

So what is it that will protect Timothy from being deceived by false teachers?

Paul answers that question in 3:14–17. He encourages Timothy to continue in

what he has learned (3:14) and he has been trained from childhood in “the sacredwritings” (3:15). Notice that we see the same emphasis found in 1 Corinthians 4:6here: the written Word of God, “the sacred writings.”

There will be two things that will keep Timothy from being deceived: his

knowledge of the sacred writings, and his continuing to “abide” in the sacred

writings. The word “abide” has the basic meaning, “to make your home.” He is tomake his home in the sacred writings. His focus is not to be on personal

experiences, no matter how supernatural they may be. As already seen in Matthew

7:22–23, his focus should not be on signs and wonders that can lead to deceptionas well, but he must abide in the written Word of God. What Peter said in 2 Peter

1:20–21, Paul says in 3:16: that the Scriptures are the inspired Word of God and,

therefore, are profitable in all areas of life. And just how profitable are the written

Scriptures? Paul answers that question, saying that the Scriptures make the man ofGod to be complete himself, while also making him “ furnished completely unto

every good work” (3:17).

What this verse teaches we must not miss. The Scriptures are sufficient tomake one thoroughly complete. There is no need to try to receive some

8/11/2019 v2n2_frucht


supernatural “zapping” from some spirit world. There is no need to spend money

to travel to Toronto for someone to lay hands on you until you either fall intouncontrollable, unstoppable laughter or make animal sounds. The written

Scriptures are able thoroughly to complete you and furnish you for every work

that you need to do. You can become spiritual and mature in the faith through the

Scriptures alone. However, this will take the discipline of studying the Word ofGod, spending hours, days, weeks, years of a lifetime to comprehend more and

more of the Word of God. But in this technological age, people have become lazy

and, therefore, seek the “instant breakfast” approach to spirituality, trying to finda “zapping” experience to get “it,” and sometimes even feeling they have become

a god themselves. By the authority of this passage, I can declare that such

experiences will not lead to spirituality, but instead will lead them to beingdeceived and then continuing to deceive others as well.

Because Timothy is knowledgeable of the Scriptures, because the Scripturesare able thoroughly to furnish him for every good work, Paul then admonishes

Timothy to go ahead and do the work of the ministry--reproving, rebuking,exhorting, and teaching (4:1–2). But this teaching is not done by any “word of

knowledge,” or divine revelation outside of Scripture; rather, this is done by the

written Word of God as Paul already stated in 3:16.

CTSJ 2:2 (Fall 1996) p. 12

Then, Paul again declares what will happen in the latter days and,

unfortunately, what Paul described has, indeed, finally happened (4:3–4). Paulstates that a day will come when believers will no longer be able to “endure the

sound doctrine” (4:3). And what is “ sound doctrine”? In contrast to the

“doctrines of demons” (1 Tim. 4:1), which are doctrines based upon the

experiential and the supernatural that go beyond that which is written, sounddoctrine is that which is based upon and comes from “ the sacred writings.”

Indeed, we are living in a day when the majority of believers in our churches

simply cannot “endure sound doctrine.”

Television, having helped render the unbelieving world’s minds mushy, hasdone the same thing for believers, as Christian television only imitates its secular

counterpart. In place of expository teaching of the Word, there is Christianamusement and Christian talk shows that carry little if any doctrinal substance. A

Charismatic speaker who causes people to become hysterical, or to act like

animals, or to fall down, can fill up whole stadiums with thousands upon

thousands of people, whom he eventually asks to empty their pockets for theoffering. But one who comes to expound the Word of God to impart an

understanding of the Scriptures and sound doctrine will draw a relatively tiny

audience. Indeed, the time and day has arrived when men cannot “endure sounddoctrine.”

So how will they try to meet their spiritual needs? Paul goes on to explain that

they “will heap to themselves teachers after their own lusts.” In other words, they

8/11/2019 v2n2_frucht


will pursue teachers who will tell them what they really want to hear (and being

persecuted for godly living is not something believers want to hear). They will pursue teachers who will promise them supernatural experiences. They will

pursue teachers who will promise them health and wealth by merely using a

formula of naming-and-claiming it; teachers who promise materialism in a

spiritually-wrapped package are the ones they will pursue. But they will strangelyavoid having to sit through in-depth teaching of the Word of God. Indeed, that

day has finally arrived.

Paul tells us the result of not enduring sound doctrine and pursuing falseteachers (4:4): first, they will “turn away their ears from the truth,” and, second,

they will “turn aside unto fables.” What are fables? Fables are, again, teachings

and doctrines outside of Scripture. As we saw earlier, Peter said he did not follow“cunningly devised fables,” because what he was teaching and preaching was

based upon the written Word of God, inspired by the Holy Spirit. The reason

Timothy will not be swept aside to follow fables is because he bases his entire

life, teaching and ministry on “the sacred writings.” Those who go beyond thethings that are written will end up following after fables. Again, fables are

teachings that we do not find in Scripture and, therefore, they either originate with

man or with the demonic world and, thereby, become doctrines of demons. Fablesare the false postulations of experiences and actions that are found nowhere in

Scripture.

Conclusion

The Toronto Phenomenon is a fable because it goes beyond the things that are

written. We must reject it because it is not based upon “the sacred writings” and,therefore, cannot pass the test of “ sound doctrine.”

On the basis of the written Word of God, I call upon all those who have been

caught up in this phenomenon to let 2 Timothy 4:4 be rephrased in your life asfollows: Turn away from the fables, and turn aside to the truth.

v2n2_frucht

Documents