webinar on "clearing the air: reducing ghg emissions from u.s. natural gas systems"
DESCRIPTION
Lead authors James Bradbury and Michael Obeiter review a new WRI working paper and its key findings, with particular attention on state-level policy solutions. For more information about this webinar, visit http://www.wri.org/event/2013/04/webinar-clearing-air-reducing-ghg-emissions-us-natural-gas-systemsTRANSCRIPT
James Bradbury, Senior Associate, Lead Author
Co-authors: Mike Obeiter, Laura Draucker, Wen Wang and Amanda Stevens
April 23, 2013
Clearing the Air:
Reducing Upstream Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S. Natural Gas Systems
Overview
1) What is known about methane emissions from natural gas systems?
2) What has been done to reduce those emissions?
3) What more can be done?
Why we need to “get it right”
Natural gas vs. coal: a climate perspective
Source: adapted from IEA, “Golden Age of Gas” special report (Figure 1.5)
Estimating Emissions From Shale Gas Systems
Opportunities to Reduce Fugitive Methane
• New EPA rules – NSPS/NESHAP– Volatile Organic Compounds(VOCs)– Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs)
• Two Scenarios with additional reductions– Low-hanging fruit– “Go-getter” scenario
Upstream GHG Emissions Projections, Shale Gas Systems
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Business as Usual
Reference Case, with EPA NSPS Rule
MM
t CO
2e, 1
00 y
r GW
P
Pre-NSPS
BAU (w/ NSPS)
Source: Baseline GHG data from Weber and Clavin (2012), EPA (2012a), and EIA (2012).
Upstream GHG Emissions Projections, All Natural Gas Systems
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Reference Case
Reference Case, with EPA NSPS Rule
MM
t CO
2e, 1
00 y
r GW
P Pre-NSPS
BAU (w/ NSPS)
Source: Baseline GHG data from Weber and Clavin (2012), EPA (2012a), and EIA (2012).
Upstream GHG Emissions
Projections from all Natural Gas
Systems, with Two
Abatement Scenarios
Source: Baseline GHG data from Weber and Clavin (2012), EPA (2012a), and EIA (2012).
Federal & State Policies to Reduce Emissions
• EPA - Direct regulation of GHG emissions– Address new and existing sources– Gets sources with lower VOC concentrations
• Enabling State Policy Leadership– Raise revenues to help state agencies keep pace– Provide technical and regulatory assistance to
states with expanding O&G development– Develop a database on state policy actions;
support model rules and legislation
Improve Understanding of Emissions/Expand Policy and Technology Options
• Collect and Analyze emissions data– Direct emissions measurements– Update emissions factors for key processes
• Applied technology research and development– Emissions measurement/leak detection– Reduce costs for abatement options
• Identify and address barriers to investment in cost-effective emissions controls
Key Takeaways1. Fugitive methane emissions represent roughly 3 to 4% of
total U.S. GHG emissions
2. Reducing these emissions to below 1% will help ensure that fuel-switching to natural gas is beneficial
3. Fugitive methane occurs at every stage of the natural gas life cycle, more direct measurements are needed
4. Recent EPA rules will stem methane leakage; but much greater reductions can be achieved cost-effectively
5. The Clean Air Act is an appropriate tool for policy action; responsive to industry and flexible for states
Thank YouJames Bradbury Mike [email protected]@wri.org