wg4d10

ec2d8

ec4g7bGSL-3wg6c6wg7a11wg4f4c

wg5b1

LG18

wg1g10

tg1c8

ec2d8

J3Gsl2wg6d6wg7a11

wg5b1

ec3g7

wg2g4

A3 / J3

rp1087.h1

opb15.1200

tg5d9.h1rp1446.e1

rp1146.h2wg7e10.h2

GSL-4

rp1201.h1

wg2a11.h2wg2g4

rp1574.h1

LG2

wg7f3

ec4e7bwg5a6

ec2c12

GSL-2wg2d11ec2e12a

wg7a8

LG1

ec3f1

wg5a5

wg3a2wg4d11wg5a6

ec2c12

J2Gsl1wg7a8Ra2-E11

A2 / J2

tgf12.e1

rp1240.h1

rp1409.h1

rp1365.h1

wg2d11.e1

rp1268.e1

GSL-3

wg7a8

wg4e12.h1

LG18

Toroser et al. 1995 Ramchiary et al. 2007a,b Uzunova et al. 1995 Toroser et al. 1995 Ramchiary et al. 2007a,b Uzunova et al. 1995

Fig 1S. Comparative map between B. juncea and B. napus harbouring GSL QTL for the two linkage groups. The linkage group J3/A3 of B. juncea showing homoeology with B. napus linkage group LG18 of Toroser et al. (1995) and LG2 of Uzunova et al. (1995) and linkage group J2/A2 of B. juncea showing homoeology with B. napus linkage group LG1 of Toroser et al. (1995) and LG18 of Uzunova et al. (1995) based on common RFLP markers.