copy of six sigma تحسين العملية بأستخدام طريقة

8/6/2019 Copy of Six Sigma

1/35

1Six Sigma

/

/

/

/

.37/ (2005: 128-161 / (1

1


2/35

1 - .

:

.

.

. ) 6 (

. .

6 ( )

-: ) 6 (

.

).6 (

( ) 6

. .

) 6 (-:

.

).6 (

) 6.(

.

. ) 6 (

. .

.

2


3/35

.

( ) 1973/1972 1974/1973 .

1991

. .

:

-( )

. - ( )

. ) 18 " (

." :

.

.

.

:"

)1. (

) 14 (%

.( ) .

.

3


4/35

() . ()

.

50. .Six Sigma2

Total Quality Management

. ))Harry,2000:33 .) Six Sigma (

Motorola ) . 6 (

) Motorola ) - -) )SO GOOD

) . WWW. Westgard. Com() 6 (

Controlling

Measuring Improving) ).)Maguire,1999:32 (

) 6 ( ) 6 (( .

Breyfogle,1999:1(

)Maguire,1999:32.(

4


5/35

5

) 2 ( :


6/35

Error: Reference source not found -SIGMA CONCEPT (6( SIGMA

. )Six Sigma-Making Customer fell quality.htm.(

) www.aluenet.com.( Six Sigma) 3.4 (

)Maguire, 1999: 32.( Six Sigma

)Stinikov, 2002: 3.(

))Wary & Hogan, 2002: 3 :-.

-: ) Re-engineering (

.- Preventing Problems. -- Delighting -

.

.) Black Belts)) ( ) (

Change experts) Greer Belts) ( ) (Change Supporters.(

. )www.aluenet.com(

-: )www.Pivotalresources.com( .( )

) 6 ( )(www.juran.com .) 6 (

) 6 () Management by Facts (

((www.aluenet.com .

6
http://www.juran.com/http://www.aluenet.com/http://www.juran.com/http://www.aluenet.com/


7/35

) 6 (

)6 ( -: )Google: six sigma glosary(

) 3.4 (Opportunity .

)Hahn et al., 2001:6(.

Incarnation

(

www.aluenet.com.() 6-: ()www.pivotalresources.com(

. . . . . ) 2 (

) X) (Y ( ] f(x.[(

Six Sigma-:)Google:Quality System & Tools-SixSigma(. . .

Six Sigma

. )Westgard, 2002:1(

Y =f(X1 , X2 , X3 ......)

7

$CL

LCL

$


8/35

) 2) (6. (Source:- (www.Pivotalresources.com).

.

) 3 . ( ) 6.(

-6 ( ) Six Sigma Philosophy Six Sigma

- -

- Zero Defect -Google: Sixsigma-MakingCustomer Feel Quality

(

8

) 3) (6(,.eteP ,ednaP :ecruoSlppuS eht tnemevorpmI ot amgiS xiS gnisU latoviP ,

2002,ASU ,secruoseR


9/35

) 6 ()www.aluenet.com( Six Sigma

) )Wary & Hogan, 2002:4.. . .

) 6 () 6 (

) 4) (6:() 4) (6(

Source: Wary, Bruce & Hogan, Bob Why Securities Operation Bank of America, USA,2002:20.

) ()www.aluenet.com 6-: (.

. . .. . .

. -Application Scope

) 6 (

. -: )www.aluenet.com(

9

6

6

( )


10/35

- :--Design for Productability

( ) - :-

-: -:Simulation.

-:Short Cycle Manufacturing. -:Standardization.

Statistical Process Control:- (SPC.(

.Paricipative Management Practices:- ).Design of Experiment (DOE:-

-:Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA.(

. ( ) -6 ( ) Six Sigma Importanat

) ()www.aluenet.com:-6 (. . .

) 5) (6) ( Traditional ) ( (

) Less Obvious-: (. . Installation. -. . . .

10


11/35

. ) 5) (6 (

*Source: Wary, Bruce & Hogan, Bob. Why six sigma in a securities operation BankofAmerica, USA, 2002:17.

. .() . .

) 1 (

)

()

( -: ) -: (

: Defect Per Million (DPM. (YIELD.

) 1) (6 (Yield

DPM

Sigma Level6

.*

11

%8-5*

( )

suoivbo

) (

52% -02

suoivbO ssoL


12/35

69%308.538293%66.8073

99.4%6.2104

99.97%233599.9996549%3.46

Source: Wary, Bruce & Hogan, Bob. Why Six Sigma in A Securities Operation. Bank ofAmerica, USA, 2002: 9.

) 2) (6) (3.() 2) (6) (3(

) 3() 6( 54000.

25.

40500 . 3 100.

.

) 16. (54000 .

35.

Source: Wary, Bruce & Hogan, Bob. Why Six Sigma in A Securities Operation Bank ofAmerica, USA, 2002: 22.

) 6) (6(

- ) 6 ) Six Sigma Stages) ()www.uist.gov: 43 :-6 (

o. o. o. o. o. o

12

6

ssecorP amgiS 6

3

LCL

LCU

egarevA

ssecorP amgiS 3

tcefeD

tcefeD

LCU

LCL

egarevA


13/35

) 6) (3 , 6) (6 (.

Source: Wary, Bruce & Hogan, Bob. Why Six Sigma in A securities Operation. Bank ofAmerica, USA, 2002: 8.

( 6

(

)7 () 6 (

-:Define Phase :

))Wary & Hogan, 2002:22 :) 6. () Pain. (

) 3-4. (.

. : Measure Phase

)144:2002.(

))www.aluenet.com : -: Characteristic Critical to

Quality(CTQ( -: .

-:

Validate

. -: )Wary& Hogan, 2002: 23(

.

..

. : Analyze Phase

13


14/35

(

146:2002.())www.aluenet.com :-

. -. - -

.

)Wary & Hogan, 2002:23( : Improve Phase

))www.aluenet.com :- -

. -. -

( 146:2002(

) 7) (6(Source:- (www.Pivotalresources.com)

14

5 -

- -1 -2-34

S C


15/35

.

.

.. ( ) )Wary & Hogan, 2002:24(

:-. . .

: Control Phase

))147:2002 .

))www.aluenet.com :-. . .

.

-Implementation Strategy) 6) (3 (

))www.aluenet.com :- -"6 ( ) Six Sigma Organization

) 6 (

) 6 (

. )6 -" ) Six Sigma Engineering Organization

) 6 (

.The Strategic Field Choice -"

) 6 (

15


16/35

210

20===

n

RR

84.9

10

4.98===

n

XX

99.102577.084.92 =+=+= RAXUCL

69.82577.084.92 === RAXLCL

84.9== XCL

.

) 3 (

) 6.(

3 .

( ):

: ) 6) (%12.(%:

) 0.1 (%%).0 (

):Burr,1996:51-57 (

.

.

.

.

.) .6 (

: .) (5 10) (

) 4 ( :-

.) 8.(

16


17/35

) 3) (6(

(

6(

6 ((

-: -

.. -

-.

//.

.

- .

-.

-- ..

- . -

. -

. -.

- .- .

- .

- . -

.

-

- .-

.

- .

. --

.

-

. -.

-

.

. -- . . -

- .-

. -

.-

.

-

.-

. -

.

. --

.-

) 6.(

-

.

-: Source:- www.aluenet.com.

) 4 (

XRSX1X2X3X4X5

1111211111211.410.54829111210910.231.3043899988.610.5484891099920.707510119999.620.894

17


18/35

23.4115.224 === DRUCL

0023 === DRLCL

2== RCL

11.11)89.0(427.184.93 =+=+= SAXUCL

57.8)89.0(427.184.93 === SAXLCL

84.9== XCL

6101212111011217121111121111.410.54881112109910.231.3049879998.420.894

107899108.631.14098.4208.887

8.69-10.99= (2.3 () 38(%*.

) .8.(

) 8 ( .

.) 9(

) 8.57-11.11= (2.54) 42.(%

*.

18


19/35

11.11)89.0(427.184.93 =+=+= SAXUCL

57.8)89.0(427.184.93 === SAXLCL

84.9== XCL

) .9.(

19

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

0

1

2

3

4

5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

%

LCU

LC

LCL

LCU

LC

LCL

) 8 (


20/35

) 9 (

) 5 (

7-7.528-8.559-9.518

10-10.5711-11.510

12-1312.5850

.) 5 (

.

(

P) (6.(

20

0

5

10

15

20

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

UCLCLLCL

UCL

CL

LCL


21/35

) 6 (

JjP

7.521-21.5100/50 (1.5-0.5) = 28.553-75100/50 (5-0.5) = 99.5188-2516.5100/50 (16.5-0.5) = 32

10.5726-3229100/50 (29-0.5) = 5711.51033-4237.5100/50 (37.5-0.5) = 7412.5843-5046.5100/50 (46.5-0.5) = 92

.).6 (

21

0

5

10

15

20

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 1 1 2 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 12.5 13.5 14.5

) 9 (

LTULTL

23.12)89.0(68.284.95

6=+=+= SXUCL

46.7)89.0(68.284.95

6=== SXLCL

84.9== XCL


22/35

7.46-12.23= (4.77 () 80.(%

" " :) Process Sigma (

22

T = 12 6

99.9

99.8

99.5

99

98

95

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

5

2

1

0.5

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.5

1

2

5

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

95

98

99

99.5

99.8

99.9

+3S

+2S

+1S

-3S

-2S

-1S

X

%%

5.

4

5.

5

5.

6

5.

7

5.

8

5.

9

5.

01

5.

11

5.

21

5.

31

5.

41

5.

51

9

5.2

61

) 01 (

95.094.0

89.0

4

===

C

S

05.195.06

612=

=Cp


23/35

:

:PS = 3 CPPS = 3 1.05 = 3.15

) Cpk: (

:

:-

.

. .

) 2.3 (

) 2.54 (

( )

.

23

45.03

34.1

3

(min)===

ZCPK

34.186.0

84.999.10=

=

=

XUCLZ

UCL

34.186.0

69.884.9=

=

=

LCLXZ

LCL

86.0326.2

2

2

===d

R

0

2

4

68

1 0

1 2

1 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0

UCL

CL

LCL

) 11 (

) 6 (


24/35

) 10.5) ) (1.5) 9.(

)%) 15

.

) 4.77 (

%.80 ) 10 (

%) 1.5 ( (%2 (2.5 ( %) .

). (1.05Cp) () (3.15) (0.15 (PS (

= (Cp PS = 3) (1.() (1.05Cp) (

) 1 (

) CPK ( ) 0.15 (

) 12) .( (

.

24


25/35

:

) (5 10) ( ) 7. (

) 7 (

XRSX1X2X3X4X5

10.050.040.050.050.05

0.048

0.010.005

20.010.020.020.030.020.020.020.00730.0

50.060.060.050.060.05

60.010.005

40.070.070.070.060.06

0.066

0.010.005

50.050.050.060.080.060.06

0.030.012

60.0

10.020.020.030.030.02

2

0.020.008

70.10.090.090.10.10.090.010.005

25

-3 +3

) 21 (

LTULTL

+)51.0(

51.3 = 50.1 3 = SP


26/35


27/35

%

UCL

CL

LCL

) 13 (

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

) 13 (.

.

) 13.(0.042-0.064= (0.022 (

) 22.(%

) .14.(

27

016.0089.20075.04

=== BSUCL

000075.03

=== BSLCL

0075.0==SCL

064.0)0075.0(427.1053.03 =+=+= SAXCL

042.0)0075.0(427.1053.03 === SAXCL

053.0== XCL


28/35

0

5

1 0

1 5

2 0

2 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1 0.11 0.12

) 15 (

UTLLTL

UCLCLLCL

UCL

CL

LCL

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

) 14 ( .

) 12. (

) 8 (

0.01-0.0270.03-0.0480.05-0.0621

0.07-0.089 0.09-0.110.1550

) 9 (

).P (

) 9 (

jJP

0.0271-74100/50 (4-0.5) = 7

28


29/35

0.0488-1511.5100/50 (11.5-0.5) = 220.062116-3626100/50 (26-0.5) = 510.08937-4541100/50 (41-0.5) = 810.1546-5048100/50 (48-0.5) = 95

.).6 (

29

073.0)0075.0(68.2053.05

6=+=+= SXUCL

033.0)0075.0(68.2053.05

6 === SXLCL

053.0== XCL


30/35

30

T = 0.1 0

99.9

99.8

99.5

99

98

95

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

5

2

1

0.5

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.5

1

2

5

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

95

98

99

99.5

99.8

99.9

+3S

+2S

+1S

-3S

-2S

-1S

X

%%

0

20

.0

40

.0

60

.0

80

.0

1.

0

21

.0

41

.0

61

.0

81

.0

450

.0

8.0

58.0

6.0

) 61 (


31/35

0.033-0.073= (0.04 () 41.(%

:

:

PS = 3 CPPS = 3 2.08 = 6.24

) CPK: (

31

48.03

43.1

3

(min)===

ZCPK

43.1007.0

053.0063.0=

=

=

XUCLZ

UCL

43.1007.0

043.0053.0 =

=

=

LCLXZLCL

007.0326.2

017.0

2

===d

R

UCL

Cl

LCL

) 71 () 6 (

0

0 .0 2

0 .0 4

0 .0 6

0 .0 8

0 . 1

0 .1 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0

008.094.0

0075.0

4

===

C

S

08.2008.06

01.0=

=Cp


32/35

:

:-

.

.

.

.

) 16) (0.054 ) %) 1 . (

%).0.6 (

) 0.004 ( %) 0.8 (%).0.85 (

.) PS=6.24) (3.24 (

) 2,6) . (PS (41.%

) 17. ( (

Cp) (2.08) (1 (

(% 1 (

32


33/35

) (CPK () 0.48

.

4 .::

" %) 16(

: :

: " .

" )1 (%

:: : .

.

ISO 9001 .

33

-3 +3

) 71 (

LTULTL

(42.3+)

42.6 = 80.2 3 = SP


34/35

) )

.

.

. .

:

( )

.

.

%).0.7 (

.()

.

.

) 1.33-1 (

.

.

34


35/35

.1. 2.

3 ". .

. ."2002 ISO 10015 4.Burr, I.W., Statistical Quality Control Methods, Mareel Dekker,USA, 1996.

5.Stinikov Cataling the Six Sigma phenomena old OR NEWPERCEPTION of Quality ? lahai, huhtikun, April,2002.6. Breyfogle Forest W.,Implementing SIX SIGMA smarter solutionsusing statistical methods, New York, 1999.7.Harry, Mikei J. A new defintion aims to connect quality with8.Hahn, G. , Doganaksoy. N., Stanard, C., Statistical tools for six sigma ,

GE research & development center, 2001.9.Magnire, M., Cow boy Quality Quality Progress, March, 1999.10.Moen, Renald D., & Nolan, Thomas W., Process Improvement A step-

by-step Approach to Analyzing and Improving A process, QualityProgress, March, 1987.11.Pande, Pete.,Using Six Sigma to Improvement the Supply Chain,Pivotal Resources, USA,2002.12.Wary, Bruce., & Hogan, Bob., Why Six Sigma insecurities operation,Bank of America, USA,2002.

13.Westgrad, Hames O.,A Six Sigma Design Tool, All rights reserved,USA, 2002.14.Google: six sigma glosary.15.Google: quality system & tools-six sigma.16.Google: six sigma-making customer feel quality.17.www.westgard.com.18.www.westgard.com. 2002.19.www.pivotalresourcess.com.20.www.aluenet.com.21.www.juran.com.22.www.uist.gov.

35

copy of six sigma تحسين العملية بأستخدام طريقة

Documents