lit com mtg

K-12 Literacy Committee

K-12 Literacy CommitteeMeeting


Desired Outcomes

Understand the need for a Literacy PlanAgree on what Literacy means

Increase knowledge and understanding for: The Common Core Standards

Schedule next meeting


Code of Cooperation

Actively ParticipateListen as an Ally

Speak from AwarenessSuspend CertaintyCelebrate diversity

Stay Engaged Mind the Schedule


The farther backward you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see.

Winston Churchill

Future-Ready Students for the21st Century

The guiding mission of the SBE

is that every public school student

will graduate from high school,

globally competitive for work and

postsecondary education and

prepared for life in the 21st Century.

We are all accountable!

Of Every 100 9th Graders in North Carolina…

6

Source: NCHEMS Information Center for Higher Education Policymaking and Analysis. Student Pipeline - Transition andCompletion Rates from 9th Grade to College. www.higheredinfo.org/dbrowser/index.php?submeasure=119&year=2006&level=nation&mode=data&state=0. 2010

http://www.higheredinfo.org/dbrowser/index.php?submeasure=119&year=2006&level=nation&mode=data&state=0

Key Components

www.p21.org

www.ncteachingconditions.org

http://www.p21.org/

http://www.ncteachingconditions.org/

Serves as a guide for North

Carolina’s school

superintendents as they reflect

upon and improve their

effectiveness as district leaders.

Focuses the goals and

objectives of districts as they

support, monitor and

evaluate their superintendents.

Guides professional

development for superintendents and serves as a

tool in developing

coaching and mentoring

programs for superintendents.

Informs higher education

programs in developing the

content and requirements of superintendent

degree programs.

New Standards and Evaluation Systems

Formative, Growth Data-

drivenPD Alignment

Teacher Education Programs

AdministratorEducation Programs

M.S.A.

Administrator Education Programs

Ed.D

Teacher Evaluation

System

School Executive Evaluation

System

(Principals and Asst. Principals)

Superintendent Evaluation

System

(Including Central Office Staff)

10

ALIGNMENT

11

Work collaboratively with all school personnel to create a professional learning community

Provides structures for the development of effective professional learning communities aligned with the school improvement plan, focused on results, and characterized by collective responsibility for instructional planning and for 21st century student learning

Provides for the development of effective professional learning communities aligned with the district strategic plan, focused on results, and characterized by collective responsibility for 21st century student learning

ALIGNMENT

Governor Perdue’s Education Initiative

12

Ready – increase number of students who can read, write and do math at the end of grade 3

Set – increase number of students performing at or above grade level

Go – increase number of students taking college credit courses in high school, graduating from high school, going to a 4-year college/university or community college

Newer ACRE work streams connecting directly with teachers, leaders, parents and students

Ongoing central work to revise standards, assessment and accountability

Newer work to deliver new standards, assessments and teaching tools

Newer work to build LEA capacity to implement online tools

Standards Assessment Accountability

Formative

Summative

Benchmark

Instructional Technology and Infrastructure InitiativesCreating tools and providing consulting-services that help enable a move to instructional and assessment models that take full advantage of

online technologies and technologies yet to be developed. Included are the creation of the State School Technology Plan, One-to-One pilot support, and planning and consulting to help LEAs build infrastructure, allocate resources and plan logistics to move to online assessment.

A revised model that includes measures of post-secondary readiness, robust, fair growth measures, revised reporting functions and motivates behavior that improves student outcomes.

Diverse communication strategies that memorably inform all stakeholders (esp. students, parents, teachers, principals) and build understanding and investment in ACRE. Communication strategies include website, webinar series, listserves, internal newsletter and LEA concierge service.

Tools and training, blending online and face-to-face learning experiences to help educators increase effectiveness and transition to new standards and assessments. Included are the creation of instructional toolkits, NC Falcon formative assessment training modules, new standards roll-out, using data to make decisions and Response to Instruction.

Learner Management System (LMS)Single, user-friendly online platform to house and deliver new tools, particularly the

delivery of formative and summative assessments, provision of data analysis tools, delivery of professional development and instructional resources to teachers and

establishment of online learning communities.

Professional Development

College and career-ready standards. A new set of academic standards benchmarked against the best national and international expectations. The goal is to set fewer, clearer and higher standards that , when achieved, ensure a student is ready for post-secondary education and work. Standards include Common Core in ELA and Math and NC Essential Standards in all other subjects. Curricular support resources will be developed to support the transition.

A comprehensive assessment system with a focus on using assessments to improve instruction and assess learning and instructional effectiveness. Plan includes updated EOG and EOCs, a tool to build common benchmark assessments and a variety of formative assessment tools including progress monitoring tools, writing assessments, in-class formative assessment training, portfolio assessments and data tools to improve instruction.

PROGRAM MAP

2010-11

Communications &Change

Management

Superintendent Standards

Principal Standards

Teacher Standards

Student Learning

The Lens to use if you are looking for a Focus; NC STANDARDS

The Standards and the NC Evaluation System is a 21st CENTURY SYSTEM

SIP • School Goals• Teacher Goals• Decision Making Process

DATA• EOG/EOC• Formative Assessment• Student Work

PLCs• Problem Solving• Prof Development• Planning

CWTs

• Focused on instructional practice

• Feedback to teachers for growth

EVALProcess

• Teacher Behaviors• Student Behaviors• Coaching

PLCs

• Data review• Instruction &

Planning• Collaboration

Common Core

• Teaching with Blooms Revised

• Rigorous content• Meaningful Use of

Knowledge • Writing

Formative Assessment

• Performance based• Communication• “Informative

assessment”

Literacy• Elementary instruction• Secondary instruction• Across all content

Teacher Standard IV:Teachers Facilitate learning for their students


Where are We?


Transformation

• Help establish Collaborative Environment for students and staff

• Build Leadership Capacity for principals and administrators

• Provide coaching for principals and teachers• Assist with the alignment of the NC Evaluation

process and district initiatives

2009-2010 Accountability Highlights

• High Growth District• Exited LEA School Improvement • Biggest Increase in Proficiency South Central Region

(7.5)• Third Highest Proficiency Increase in the State• 16 of 19 Schools Met Expected Growth• 11 Schools Met High Growth• 4 Schools of Distinction (80% proficiency and meet

growth targets)

44.7%

56.7%

64.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Proficiency Rates, 2007-2008 through 2009-2010:Reading in Grades 3-8

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

56.6%

69.8%

76.3%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Proficiency Rates, 2007-2008 through 2009-2010:Math in Grades 3-8

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

62.7% 63.1%

81.5%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Proficiency Rates, 2007-2008 through 2009-2010:EOC Composite in Grades 9-12

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010


Columbus County EOG Reading Scores

Grade 07-08 08-09 09-103 45.3 52.5 61.6

4 44.2 61.68 68.2

5 44 53.7 64.2

6 45.6 60.1 65.6

7 45.6 56 66.3

8 43.6 57 59.1


Where are we Going? RttT

Measure State/LEA Baseline Targets

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

Gr 4 Read State 71.6 74.6 77.6 80.6 83.6

LEA 68.2 71.2 74.2 77.2 80.2

Gr 4 Math State 83.0 85.0 87.0 89.0 91.0

LEA 77.5 80.5 83.5 86.5 88.5

Gr 8 Read State 69.2 72.2 75.2 78.2 81.2

LEA 59.1 63.2 66.3 69.4 72.5

Gr 8 Math State 83.9 86.9 89.9 92.9 95.9

LEA 79.5 81.8 84.1 86.4 88.6

Grad Rate State 71.7% 74% 76% 79% 82%

LEA 72.4% 74.9% 77.4% 79.9% 82%

Avg SAT Com State 1008 (63%) 1009 (65%) 1014 (67%) 1019 (69%) 1025 (72%)

LEA 910 (38.5%) 920 (43.5%) 940 (48.5%) 970 (53.5%) 990 (58.%)


Where are We going?

• June 30: Draft a K-12 Literacy Plan aligned with the plan to the RttT Scope of Work Plan– The Plan will include a K-12 Literacy Structure– The Plan will continued Professional Development– The Plan will include a calendar for the K-12

Literacy Committee and Advisory Committees– The Plan will include the implementation for the

Common Core Standards


Training Components

InitialTraining

Follow Up

On-SiteCoaches

GuidedPractice

Small Group

Sharing

ObserveCo-Teach


Key Comprehension Routine

Main Idea

Top Down Web

2 Column Notes

Summarizing Generate Questions


Middle School/High School PD PlanKey Comprehension Routine (KCR)

Key Vocabulary Routine (KVR)

November 22-23, 2010 KCR 2 Day Initial Training5 people

January 4-5, 2011 KVR 2 Day Initial Training5 people

February 7, 2011 KCR Overview for Administrators19 peopleFebruary 8-9, 2011 KCR 2 Day Initial Training

26 peopleFebruary 28-March1, 2011 KCR Coaches Training18 peopleVarious Dates KCR PLC Meetings

30 peopleMarch 21-22, 2011 KCR Follow Up Sessions

32 peopleVarious Dates KCR PLC Meetings

30 peopleMay 9-10, 2011 KCR Follow Up Sessions

32 peopleJuly 27-28, 2011 KCR 2 Day Initial Training (Tent) 40 peopleSeptember 14-15, 2011 KVR 2 Day Initial Training

40 peopleOctober 10-11, 2011 KVR Coaches Training

25 peopleOctober 12-14, 2011 KCR Level I Trainer Training

4 peopleOctober 31- November 1, 2011 KVR Follow Up Sessions40 peopleDecember 6-7, 2011 KVR Follow Up Sessions

40 people

lit com mtg

Documents