pou40q42010

Upload: moi-le-sage

Post on 06-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 Pou40Q42010

    1/10

    POURENEWduCiel

    ThemagazineforenthusiastsofHenriMignetsdesigns

    IssueNo.40

    1 5BLMCanard

    10CosandeyMoreBLM8

    Part103FlyingFleas

    FourthQuarter,2010 ...betterlatethannever!

    BLMCanardbyRaymondBaudouinThefutureFlyingFlea?

    FromvarioustextswrittenbyRaymondBaudouin,collectedandtranslatedbyPaulPontoiswiththeprecioushelpof AlainBerland

    ComparisonbyRaymondBaudouinbetweentheHM293Grunberg

    andthePou-CanardBaudouinBLM

    4 Axel,RaymondandMichel

    Forbothaircraft,thefrontwingpivotsarounditsspanwiseaxis,whichchangesitsincidenceangleandtherearwingisfastenedto

    thefuselagewithapredeterminedincidenceangle.

    AccordingtoRB,theratiobetweentheareaofthefrontwingandtheareaoftherearwingdeterminesthelocationofthecenterof

    gravity.

    ExperiencefrommodelsandflighttestsonthePou-Canarddeterminedtheverticalandhorizontaldistancesbetweenthewings.

    Inthisstudy,RB,foreaseofunderstanding,considerstheangleformedbythe2virtuallinesextendingthechordsofthefrontand

    rearwings.

    Ifthe2linesareparallel,theangle(measuredunderthewings)isconsideredasbeing180.

    IftheVformedbythe2linesispositive(asanormaluprightV),theangleismorethan180.WewillcallthisVinterincidence.(Int-Conthedrawings)

    IftheVformedbythe2linesisnegative(asaninvertedV),theangleislessthan180.

    Becauseofthewingareasratio,eachmodelofflyingfleahasaspecificlocationoftheGC. -->

  • 8/2/2019 Pou40Q42010

    2/10

    (BLMcanardcont.)

    POURENEW2FourthQuarter,2010

    Wingsareas:Front:6.72sqmRear:5.09sqm(areasratio:1.3)Chordforeachwing:1.2mHorizontalgapbetweenwings:0Thelongerwingisthefrontwing. TheareasratiodeterminestheCG(centerofgravity)locationat25%ofthetotalchord(distancebetweenfrontwingleadingedgeandrearwingtrailingedge). Theinterincidenceisnegativeat177t-i:180-6(incidencerearwing)+3(incidencefrontwing).As,forafrontwingincidenceof-2,theliftisequaltozero,theremustbeastoptopreventthewingreachinganegativeincidence.1/-Innormallevelflight,thestickisvertical,withoutpushingorpullinginthehand.

    2/-Ifthepilotincreasesthespeedandpushesthestickforwardtillthefrontwingincidenceis0(againstthestop),Theinterincidenceisnegativeat174t-i:180-6+0.Thestickpushesrearwardinthepilot'shandandtrendstowardscomingbacktothepreviousposition(+3incidencefrontwing).

    3/-Iftheclassicalflyingfleaistailheavy(b-e:28%totalchord),withthesameincidences,

    Atcruisespeed,butstillmoreatincreasedspeed,thestickwillpushforwardinthepilot'shandtothestop.Butiftherewerenostopat0incidenceandifthepilotdoesnotholdthestick,itwillcrossthepointofzeroliftforthefrontwingandtheflyingfleawillenterintoanirreversibledive.

    - ForRB'sPou-Canard(BLM).

    Wingsareas:Front:4.3sqmrear:6.94sqm.(areasratio:1.6)Chordforeachwing:1.2m.Horizontalgap:0.35m.Theshorterwingisthefrontwing.TheareasratiodeterminestheCGlocationat34%ofthetotalchord. Theinterincidenceispositiveat181,t-i180-2(rearwingincidence)+3(frontwingincidence).1/-Innormallevelflight,thestickisvertical,withoutpushingorpullinginthepilot'shand.

    RBpointsoutthat,duetothis181interincidenceangle,therangeoflongitudinalstabilityis4higherthanfortheconventionalflyingflea(181177),whichisimportant,aswewillsee,whentheaircraftistailheavy.

    2/-Ifthepilotincreasesthespeedandpushesthestickforwardtillthefrontwingincidenceis0(againstthestop),theinterincidenceis178t-i:180-2.

    -

    redesignedinthe80'sbyRodolpheGrunberg.

    Asanexample,fortheclassicalflyingflea,RBtakestheHM293

    Croisirestabilise=cruisespeed

    Vitessemajore=increasedspeed

    Vitessemajore=increasedspeedPortancenulle=ZeroliftSansbute=Nostop

    Croisirestabilise=cruisespeed

  • 8/2/2019 Pou40Q42010

    3/10

    POURENEW3FourthQuarter,2010

    (BLMcanardcont.)

    Thestickpushesrearwardinthepilot'shand

    andtrendstowardscomingbacktothepreviousposition(+3incidencefrontwing).

    3/-IftheBLMistailheavy(b-e: About37%totalchord),withthesameincidences,atcruisespeedandevenathigherspeed,thestickbeingpushedbythepilotagainstthestop,itwilltrendtowardscomingbackbyitselftothevertical(neutralpoint).Iftherewerenostop,thestickwouldnothaveanytendencytogoforward.

    Remark: InthenextissuesofPou-Renew,wewillseetheimportancegivenbyRaymondBaudouintothehorizontalandvertical

    distancesbetweenthetwowingsandhowhecalculatestheCGlocationinrelationwiththewings'areasandweights.

    ...forthoseinterestedindetails,youmightliketo

    writetohim(inFrench,please)at:

    RaymondBaudouin,QuartierlesCharignons,Peyrus26120,France

    M.

    CongratulationsAudreyandWilliam !ThanksforsharingMatt---

    Sun,Jun20,2010HappyFathersday!

    Lookwhatmytwokids Audrey(10)and William(6)madeforFathersday!Matt

    MattNaivasartistkidsandfutureFlyingFleaers

    Vitessemajore=increasedspeed

    Vitessemajore=increasedspeedPortancenulle=Zerolift

  • 8/2/2019 Pou40Q42010

    4/10

    POURENEW4FourthQuarter,2010

    AboutAxel,RaymondandMichelonCanardFleas

    WhilegoingoverfortheumteenthtimeRaymond`sgraphicsbegantomakealittlemoresensetome!

    BasicallyheisgraphicallyshowingtherelativedisplacementoftheCGandtheFGondifferentconfigurationsandflightconditions.QuiteclearlyshowingthatinsomeconditionstheCGeithercoincidesorevenisbehindtheFG,which,aswewellknow,makesforalongitudinallyunstableaircraft.

    Michel,withhiswideverticalandhorizontalwing-gapsmanagedtonotonlygetawaywithveryaftCGs,butasafringebenefit,stumbledacrossthefactthatatcertaingaps,theairflowovertheentiremachinebecamelaminar,withinmostflightconditions. Thiswasagreatadvantagebecauseitallowedbothgreatercruisespeedsandalowerstallspeed.

    Axel,whoisdearlymissed,gotenthusedbyMichelsdiscovery,andstartedstudyingtherangeofwherethisphenomenonapplied,usingveryadvancedflightanalysiscomputerprograms.Inhiscase,he

    discoveredthattherangewasquiteample.Iquotepartofoneofhismails:

    Axelcarriedonhisresearcheventestingshorterfrontwingspans.

    >>>InqualifyingMichel'sempiricalresultsfromhis'France'days,whereheused80cmEhand70cmEvIfoundthatthereisasolidrelationshiptolaminarflowatequalentreplans.So,thereforerecommend65/65,70/70,80/80orwhateveryouchoose,howeverthegreatertheentreplanthebetteruptoapointandmorespecificallyitrelatestotheverticaltokeepasmoothflow.

    AsMicheldemonstrated80h/70vintufttestsasaworkinglaminarentreplan,(withcertainaerofoils-itmakesadifference)Imodeledthisplanandfoundwithvariousprofilesthatlaminarlowdrag

    performancecanbehadatsmallerEhiftheEvwasatleast80cm.Asamatteroffact,Igotallthewaydownto50cmEhbeforeit

    wentturbulent. WiththeEhat80cm,theEvbecameturbulentatabout65cm.Verticalentreplanismostimportantinthed'Escathaformula.Itisliterallywhateveryonehasignoredfordecades

    becausechangesinEvhavelittleeffectwhileturbulent.

    Inthefinalanalysis,Ifoundthatstartingat90cm/90cmwithanyofthemostusedaerofoilsonPou'sthattheyremainedinlaminarflowallthewaydowntoabout20cm/20cm.Ofcoursebelow50or60cmitisn'tofpracticalusebutinallcasesitdidperformcorrectlyfromhighspeedjustbeforecenterofpressurebouncesoffintoinfinity,andintheotherdirectionveryslowspeeddeepmush. Thiswaswithequalspans,equalchords. Whenusingunequalspansorinadditionunequalchordsturbulencewasdifficulttoavoidbelow50cm.

  • 8/2/2019 Pou40Q42010

    5/10

    POURENEW5FourthQuarter,2010

    CONTRIBUTIONLTUDEET AURGLAGEDES ARONEFSDEH.MIGNET

    par LouisCosandey,technicien.PilotebrevetCsur planeur Pou-du-Ciel

    (CONTRIBUTION TO THESTUDY AND TOTHE AJUSTEMENT OF THEH.MIGNET

    AIRCRAFT)TranslationbyPaulPontois

    (continued)

    ManyamateursareconvincedthattheNACA

    23012airfoilmadetheFlyingFleastablein

    everysituationofflight.Thisiswrong,but,on

    theotherhand,thefactthatthecenterofLift

    ofthisairfoilispracticallyinvariablemadethe

    elevatorcontrolmorestable,theleverarm

    beingpracticallyconstant.

    Thetwowingsaretooclosetoeachotherto

    workindependently.The2airfoilsinlinehave

    tobeconsideredasasingleone,theshape

    ofwhichchangesaswantedbythepilot.

    Mostofthetime,theincidenceoftherear

    wingisbiggerthantheincidenceofthefront

    wingandtheresultingairfoilishollow,withaslotinthemiddle.

    Thisslotisveryimportant,asitgivestheaircraft

    atremendousstabilitywhenflyingathigh

    angleofattack

    Thisstabilitydecreasesastheangleofattack

    decreases.

    Todecreasetheangleofattackwepushon

    thestickand,consequently,weincreasethe

    negativeinterincidencebetweenthetwo

    wings.Theairfoilformedbythetwowingsbecomes

    stillmoreconcave.Weareclosetothe

    instabilityzoneand,ifthelocationofthe

    centerofgravityisnotproper,theplanecould

    tumbleonitsback.

    Wehavetoadmitthattheoldsharpnosed

    airfoiloftheHM14wasmorestableinadive

    thattheNACA23012.

    Toillustratetheabove,hereunderaretwo

    curvesofstabilityshowingtheincidenceof

    thefrontwingintheairflow,inrespecttothe

    positionofthestick

    ThefirstcurvereferstotheoldHM14sharp

    nosedairfoil,withnooverlappingofthefront

    wingovertherearwing.,locationofthecenter

    ofgravity:46.5%ofthefrontwingchord(65cm

    fromtheleadingedge)

    ThesecondcurvereferstoaHM210model,

    airfoil:NACA23012withtheregulartrailing

    edge.intervalbetweenthetwowings10cm.,

    locationofthecenterofgravity:48%ofthe

    frontwingchord.

    Manchepouss=stickfrontwardManchetir=StickbackwardIncidencedel'aileavantsurlatrajectoire=Frontwingincidencewithrespecttotheflightpath.Sansborddefuiterelev=withregulartrailingedge

    FortheHM14,wenoticethattheslopeofthecurveismoreorlesssteady.Foronepositionof

    thestick,wehaveone(andonlyone)attitude

    AIRFOILS ANDSTABILITY

  • 8/2/2019 Pou40Q42010

    6/10

    POURENEW6 Quarter,2010 Fourth

    (Cosandeycont.)

    oftheplane.

    Fortheothercurve,correspondingtothe

    NACA23012airfoil,wenoticethat,atlow

    incidence,asmallmovementofthestick

    givesalargevariationofattitudeand,whichis

    stillmoreworrying,foraninterincidenceof-3

    degrees,theaircraftcouldtake2different

    attitudes,+3degrees(pointA)or-6degrees

    (pointB).Wearerightintheinstabilityzone.

    We,ofcourse,tookthisexampleforthe

    purposeinhandandwenowaregoingtosee

    howtoexplainthisparadox.

    Idobelievethatthelocationofthecenterof

    gravity,whichseemstobealmostidenticalfor

    bothaircraft,especiallyifwetakeinto

    considerationthedistanceof10cmbetween

    thetwoNACA23012wings,isnotreally

    identical.Thecenterofliftofthe23012is

    situatedat26%ofthewingchordwhilethe

    centerofliftoftheold1934Mignetairfoilis

    situatedat30%minimum.Thereforeifwewantthetwoaircrafttohavethesame

    aerodynamicreaction,thecenterofgravity

    locationoftheHM210(23012airfoil)should

    bemovedforwardtobelocatedatmaybe

    44%ofthechordinplaceof48%.Thecurve

    wouldcertainlybedifferentandmorestable.

    Whatshouldwethinkofthelocationofthe

    centerofgravityrecommendedbyMignetfor

    theHM293,muchmorebackward?

    First,wehavetotakeintoconsiderationthe

    lifteduptrailingedgeoftherearwingwhich

    makestheplaneautostable,especiallyatlow

    flightangles.Then,wehavetotrustMignet

    andassumethatthenumerousprototypeshe

    builtbenefitedfromtheexperienceofthe

    varioustestsmadeintunnelandinflight.

    That'swhywehavetocloselyrespectthe

    plans.

    Foraninterwing=0,thecenterofgravityoftheHM293mustbesituatedat62cmfrom

    theleadingedge.Undernormalflight

    conditions,Ibelievethatitshouldneverbe

    morebackwardnottobecomeunstable,whichisunpleasantathighspeed.

    Ifthecenterofgravitylocationisatmorethan

    60%ofthefrontwingchord.Insomecases,

    theelevatorcontrolwon'tbeefficientenough

    torecover.(accordingtothepitchingcurves

    drawnupbytheLillewindtunnel.)

    Inthebooklet#2page24,wecanreadthat

    theHM293hastobebalancedbetween65

    and70%.Ihopefortheamateursthatthey

    meantbetween65and70centimeters,ifnot

    theyaregoingtobeinbigtrouble.

    However,wehavetoremindthereaderthatthe

    horizontalinterwinghasastabilizingaction.

    Forinstance,foraHM293whichhasthe

    followingcharacteristics:

    Frontwingspan:5.50m.

    Rearwingspan:4.20

    Rearwingtrailingedgeturnedup,

    ifthehorizontalinterwingis+10cm,thecenter

    ofgravitycanbelocatedat65cmfromtheleadingedge,butiftheinterwingis20cmfrom

    theleadingedge,itcanbelocatedat68cm

    fromtheleadingedge.

    Diagram#8givesusagoodideaofthe

    characteristicsofthe3airfoilsusedfortheflying

    Fleas.

    These3airfoilsare:

    Thesharpedgedairfoilasperthe1934book.

    Thenewairfoilasperthe1936edition.TheNACA23012.

    Unfortunately,IcouldnotgettheCxcurvefor

    the1934airfoil.

    These3polarcurveshavebeencalculatedfor

    thefrontwingonly,wingaspectratio:5.

    Astheexperimentsmayhavebeendonein

    differenttunnelsandfordifferentReynold

    numbers,theresultsmustbetakenwithall

    reserve.

    TheoldHM1934airfoildoesnotbehavetoo

    badly,ifweexceptthatthecenterofliftis

    knowntobevagrant.Thelossofliftwhenthe

  • 8/2/2019 Pou40Q42010

    7/10

    POURENEW7 Quarter,2010 Fourth

    (Cosandeycont.)

    angleofattackincreasesseemstobe

    progressive.

    TheairfoilHM1936seemstobeexcellent.Its

    centerofliftmoveverylittle.(Thispolarcurve

    waskindlypassedontousbyHenriMignet)

    Weshouldnotbetoosurprisedofthegeneral

    valueofthemaximumCz.

    Forthe23012.Weonlyreach100Cz=116,

    becauseofthewingaspectratioequalto5

    andofthenumberofReynoldsequalto604000,closetowhatwasgivenbytheLillewind

    tunnelstudies.

    Itactuallyhappensthat,whenthenumberof

    Reynoldsincreases,thepolarcurveimprovesin

    thesensethatthemaximumCzincreasesand

    thattheminimumCxdecreases.COSANDEYENDSHERE

  • 8/2/2019 Pou40Q42010

    8/10

    POURENEW8 Quarter,2010 Fourth

    FlyingFleasthatmightbeeligibleforFARPart103

    (andsomemightevenfitundertheunder70Kgrequiredinsomecountries)

    ThemostobviouscandidatewouldbetheButterflyat63Kgemptyweightand,notveryconvincingly,footlaunchable,aswell.Sadly,forthetimebeing,itisnotavailableanymoreinitskitformyet,withalotofluck,onejustmightbeabletotraceonedowninFranceorBelgium. Thatweknowof,thereisalsooneplusacoupleoffuselageframesin

    existenceintheU.S.(alittleinvestigatingmightlocatewhohasthemandifheiswillingtopartwiththem).

    Alternatively,onecouldattemptbuildingone.ThiswouldrequireobtainingtheplansfromGuyFrancoisinBrussels(Tel+320486939234)ButterflyIIisapop-riveted2024 Aluframe,meanwhiletheButterflyIIIsportsawelded Alualloyframe.Eachwiththeirownlevelofdifficulty

    andskillrequirements.Thewingsusethermoformedplasticribs,whichforsomemightmeananaddeddifficulty.Maybetheycouldbereplacedwith AluorStyroribs.

    Thenext,maybepossible,butnottoosureifitwillmeetthemaxemptyweight,couldbetheBifly,whichbasicallyisatractorandfuselagedButterfly.Nomorekitsaremadeyetonemightbeabletotraceonedown. TherewerequiteafewbuiltinFrance.

  • 8/2/2019 Pou40Q42010

    9/10

    POURENEW9 Quarter,2010 Fourth

    -HM-293(mono-seater)redesignedbyRodolpheGRUNBERG. TheplanswhichtriggeredtherenewaloftheFleamovementinEurope.

    22plans+brochureinEnglish+hardwareCDforlasercutting.Including Trigearoptionsetofdrawingsandmuchmore=150US$

    -HM-360(mono-seater)andHM-380(two-seater)ThelastamateurbuiltplansdesignedbyHenriMignet,updatedbyhissonPierre.A jewelofwoodandfabricconstruction.22plansinEnglish=160US$Rearendbracketsfortrigearversion:

    4plans=10US$

    -AVIONNETTENewdesignbyPaulFournierfromtheHM-8book. TheHM-8wasthelastMignetcreationbeforethePou-du-Ciel.Abouttwohundredswerebuilt.24bilingualplans+

    constructionphotographs=130US$

    Allpricesshipping&Handlingincluded.Quickdelivery.Payment:Checkormoneyorder.

    PaulPONTOIS1890rangdeschutesSTE-URSULE(Qubec)J0K3M0CANADA

    Ph:8192283159Email:[email protected]

    AttentionEnglishspeakingbuilders!!

    TranslatedintoEnglish

    WECANHELP YOUGETTING

    FRENCHMIGNETPLANS

    (FFPart103cont.)

    Nextinline,andinthiscasereadilyavailableoff

    theshelf,wouldbethePouchelIILight,whichwasspecificalydesignedbyDanielDalbytomeetthePart103requirements.

    Http://www.pouchel.com/english/index_eng.php?p=accueil_eng.htm

    IseenoreasonwhyaPouchelLightcouldnotbemorphedintoaButterfly.Whatismore,one

    couldusean AluladderasonGaryGowersLaBamba,fortheframe.

    So,whataboutwood?Notonlyisitpossible,butithasbeendone.PracticallyalltheMignetPousareveryoverdimensioned,so,forexample, YvesSegonds,afterverycarefulstudyandre-engineering,managedtobuildasafe94KgHM293.

    Onthesamelines,MicheldEscathahas

    producedadesigntomeetthePart103requirements.Sadly,wehavenotseenanyexamplesinflight,sofirst,someadventuroustestpilotwouldhavetobuildone.

    Charlie

    PS:Shouldanyonehavesuggestionsforenlargingthislist,pleasefeelfreetodoso

  • 8/2/2019 Pou40Q42010

    10/10

    WENEEDYOURHELPTOKEEPPOURENEWGOING!

    WRITETOUS!SENDUSARTICLES!

    POURENEW10 Quarter,2010 Fourth

    Fornow,pleasemailyourcontributionsto:PaulPontoisorCharlieCrawley

    RaymondtaxiinghisPoucanardAftercarefulstudy,heswitchedtherearwingforthefrontoneonhiskitBifly

    andtheresultwasanincrediblystableandwellbehavedcraft

    ImportantNotice: DesignsproposedonPouRenewarestrictlytheresponsibilityofthedesignersandnotofPouRenew.Potentialbuildersarestronglyrecommendedtoresearchthedesignanditsbackgroundbeforecarryingon....Itisyourneckthatyouarerisking!

    TheFuturePou?Baudouins

    POUCANARDCanalsobeseenat:http://www.flyingflea.com.arunderButterfly>CanardFlea

    Duetothelackofcontributionsandarticles,weareforcedtosuspend

    PouRenewonaquarterlybasis.

    Asfromnowon,itwillbepublishedassoonaswereceivefromyouflying

    flea-ersenoughinformationsoastofillatleasteightpages.

    Itisyourmagazineguys...sopleasestartsendingarticlessowemaykeeponpublishing!