tta1strategyrev1nov2011a

8/12/2019 TTA1strategyRev1Nov2011a

1/39

TTA1

Energy efficient and environmentally

sustainable technologies

Lead Party

A/S Norske Shell

TTA group companies and organisations:

A/S Norske Shell, Statoil, ConocoPhillips, Aker Solutions,Proactima, Aquateam, IRIS, DNV, SINTEF, NGI, Bellona.

Revision 1, November 2011. This is a version reviewed by

the OG21 board. A specific OG21 seminar for this TTA sub-strategy will be arranged in spring 2012, and a final version is

planned issued in June 2012.


2/39

ii

Abbreviations.......................................................................................................................... ivExecutive summary .................................................................................................................. v1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 12. Vision and goals ................................................................................................................ 13. Business Case 1: Exploration & Development in Environmentally Sensitive Areas. 2

3.1. Overview .................................................................................................................... 23.2. Future Challenges and Technology Gaps ................................................................... 3

3.2.1. General challenges ................................................................................................... 33.2.2. Exploration ............................................................................................................... 43.2.3. Development ............................................................................................................ 5

3.3. R&D Needs ................................................................................................................ 63.3.1. General R&D needs ................................................................................................. 63.3.2. R&D needs for Exploration...................................................................................... 73.3.3. R&D needs for Development ................................................................................... 8

4. Business Case 2: Barents Sea Gas & Condensate Field Development ........................ 94.1. Overview .................................................................................................................... 94.2. Future Challenges and Technology Gaps ................................................................... 94.3. R&D Needs .............................................................................................................. 10

5. Business Case 3: Field Life Extension.......................................................................... 115.1. Overview .................................................................................................................. 115.2. Future Challenges and Technology Gaps ................................................................. 115.3. R&D Needs .............................................................................................................. 12

6. R&D Priorities, Time frame and Funding for the most important areas for valuecreation on the NCS............................................................................................................... 14

6.1. Table 1: Understanding the Natural Environment and the Ecosystems ................... 156.2. Table 2: Remote Sensing Technologies ................................................................... 156.3. Table 3: Modelling Tools ......................................................................................... 166.4. Table 4: Environmental Monitoring ......................................................................... 176.5. Table 5: Leak Detection ........................................................................................... 186.6. Table 6: Energy Efficiency ...................................................................................... 196.7. Table 7: Produced Water Technology ...................................................................... 206.8. Table 8: Oil Spill Response Technologies ............................................................... 206.9. Table 9: Technology for Seismic Operations ........................................................... 216.10. Table 10: Drilling Technologies .............................................................................. 21

7. Roadmap for the future................................................................................................. 228. Link to other TTAs........................................................................................................ 239. Recommendations.......................................................................................................... 24


3/39

iii

10. Appendices .................................................................................................................. 2510.1. List of participants in TTA1 ..................................................................................... 2510.2. Ongoing R&D activities ........................................................................................... 25

Table A1: On-going R&D related to Energy efficient and environmentally sustainable

technologies .................................................................................................................... 26Table A2: On-going research projects related to research programs (RCN) andSkattefunn (As per end of 2010) ...................................................................................... 28

This report has been compiled by Helge Skjveland (Norske Shell, editor) with assistance from the TTA1 groupmembers Espen Hoell (Proactima), Eilen Arctander Vik (Aquateam), Ingun Hovland (Norske Shell), AnneHjelle (IRIS) and Stein Erik Srstrm (SINTEF). Other members of the TTA1 group who have contributed

include Nina Christine Kirkeng (Aker Solutions), Eimund Garpestad (ConocoPhillips), Anne Gunn Rike (NGI),Ivar Singsaas (SINTEF), Stle Johnsen (Statoil), Odd Willy Brude (DnV) and Karl Kristensen (Bellona).


4/39

iv

Abbreviations

CCS Carbon Capture and Storage

CNG Compressed Natural Gas

E&P Exploration and Production

EOR Enhanced Oil Recovery

FME Centre for Environment-friendly Energy Research

IOR Increased Oil Recovery

JIP Joint Industry Project

LCA Life Cycle Assessment

LNG Liquefied Natural Gas

NCS Norwegian Continental Shelf

NDP Norwegian Deepwater Program

NPD Norwegian Petroleum Directory

o.e. oil equivalents

OED Oil and Energy Directory

OG21 Norways official technology strategy for the petroleum sector

OGP International Association of Oil & Gas Producers

OLF Oljeindustriens Landsforening (Norwegian version of OGP)

PWT Produced Water Technology

R&D Research and Development

RCN Research Council of Norway

scm Standard cubic metres

TTA Technology Target Area

TTA1 "Energy efficient and environmentally sustainable technologies one of four TTAs as outlined by the OG21 Board

KMB Kompetanseprosjekt med brukermedvirkning

BIP Brukerstyrte innovasjonsprosjektr

FP Framework Programme (EU innovation, research and development grants)

AUV Autonomous underwater vehicle


5/39

v

Executive summary

OG21, the task force established to assist the Norwegian petroleum industry to formulate atechnology strategy for added value and competitive advantage in the oil and gas industry,issued in August 2010 a revised strategy document. This document, named Energy efficient

and environmentally sustainable technologies, was identified as one of four new technologytarget areas (TTAs). Due to the complexity of the overall OG21 strategy document, each ofthe four TTAs has its own individual sub-strategy.

The main objective and strategy of the TTA Energy efficient and environmentallysustainable technologies (hereafter named TTA1) is to ensure that the operators on the

Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS) remain in a leading position with respect toenvironmental performance, whilst contributing to safe and optimised resource recovery, andvalue creation.

The maritime sector and the energy sector have similar strategic organisations; Maritim21 and

Energi21.1Both organisations have TTAs linked to their sectors discussing the importance ofenergy efficient and environmentally sustainable technologies. OG21 and Energy21 have

jointly addressed Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), and a joint CCS strategy report hasbeen prepared by CLIMIT.2Therefore technologies related to CCS have not been included inthis report.

Some areas of the NCS face challenges related to ageing facilities, tie-ins of marginal fields toexisting infrastructure, and tail-end production; activities all of which rapidly increase the

produced water- and gas production rates. This calls for improved water treatmenttechnologies and increased energy efficiency. Energi21 covers the development of new andalternative energy sources, thus these has been omitted here.

The TTA1 strategy focuses on environmental technology and competence necessary to:

Attain the societysacceptance for continued growth and development of the oil andgas industry

Reduce the environmental footprint of existing fields, and minimise the footprint ofexploration and development in environmentally sensitive areas

Enhance the energy efficiency of exploration and production (E&P) related work Reduce the environmental risk and improve the preventive measures to avoid

accidental oil spills, and minimise the damage if they occur

TTA1 has identified technology gaps and research needs that need to be met in order tocombat the challenges related to further development of oil and gas activities on the NCS.

The TTA1 vision is to support the Norwegian industry to become the most energy

efficient oil and gas industry in the world.

1Maritim21 (www.maritim21.no)is a holistic research and innovation strategy for the maritime industry inNorway, initiated by the Ministry of Trade and Industry. Energi21 (www.energi21.no)is a parallel organisation

to OG21, established by the Ministry of Oil and Energy.2CLIMIT report ref.: www.climit.no/frontend/files/CONTENT/CLIMIT/Energi21-innsatsgruppeCCS-endelig.pdf
http://www.maritim21.no/http://www.maritim21.no/http://www.maritim21.no/http://www.energi21.no/http://www.energi21.no/http://www.energi21.no/http://www.energi21.no/http://www.maritim21.no/


6/39

vi

The current, and the future, business challenges on the NCS have been evaluated from aTTA1 perspective. The three most relevant business cases are considered to be:

1) Exploration & Development in Environmentally Sensitive Areas

2)

Barents Sea Gas & Condensate Field Development3) Field Life Extension

For each of these business cases technology gaps and detailed technology needs have beenidentified. The value potentials have not been identified, however the implementation ofenergy efficient and environmentally sustainable technologies as outlined herein is a criticalstep in order to obtain "license to operate", after which the value potential may be realised.For each of the technology needs, the time perspective, cost level, time criticality, marketvalue, fulfilment of OG21 strategic goals and main barriers for success have been outlined.For ease of understanding, the technology gaps have been summarised into the followingthematic areas:

1. Understanding the natural environment and the ecosystems2. Remote sensing technologies3. Modelling tools4. Environmental monitoring5. Leak detection6. Energy efficiency7. Produced water technology8. Oil spill response technologies9. Technology for seismic operations10.Drilling technologies

Furthermore, a second list of TTAs has been identified; a prioritised list of important industryneeds independent of governmental funding:

1. Produced water technologies (PWT)2. Detect, contain and clean up spills3. Remote sensing technologies for real-time mapping of biological resources4. Leak detection for pipelines, risers, subsea and surface equipment5. Develop energy efficient systems for cuttings handling6. Technologies to reduce the hole diameter (i.e.drill slender wells)

In line with the overall strategic goals of OG21, development of the technologies outlinedwithin the aforementioned focus areas will contribute to increased safety, and help minimisethe environmental impacts associated with operation on the NCS. It is also expected thatenhanced R&D in these areas will contribute to increased energy efficiency in the oil and gas

production from the NCS, which again will lead directly to a decreased environmental impactthrough reduced greenhouse gases emissions.

Governmental funding should primarily focus on education, basic science, long-termtechnology development and the stimulation of technology pilots. The funding should focuson the fundamental research elements of the value chain, and provide risk reductions for

important technologies that otherwise might not be developed and/or matured. Governmentalengagement should also stimulate research to secure a high level of competence in Norway,


7/39

vii

since without incentives the industry will perform its research abroad. Increasing internationalcompetition makes it necessary for the government to show a long-term commitment and

provide support to the supplier industries that are based in Norway. This is particularlyimportant for developing the competence and technologies needed to become the most energyefficient and environmentally friendly oil and gas industry in the world. In a global context,

the NCS has been the world leader in clean and energy efficient production for many years,but has now been surpassed by the Middle East region (Figure ES1).

F igure ES1: kg CO2equivalent per produced barrel oil equivalent.

(Source OLF Miljrapport 2011

3

)

3http://www.olf.no/no/Publikasjoner/MIljorapporter/Miljorapport-2011/


8/39

viii

With these considerations in mind, the following is a prioritised list of areas needinggovernmental funding:

1. Develop methods to improve the energy efficiency of offshore operations as well astransport of oil and gas

2.

Improve knowledge of real-time integrated monitoring and modelling systems3. Systems to limit and control emissions to air4. Increase the fundamental understanding of the fate and effects of EOR/IOR chemicals,

including produced water treatment5. Improve knowledge and understanding of the natural environment and the ecosystems6. Develop new and continue to improve oil spill response systems7. Improve systems for leak detection, including real time monitoring and remote control

systems for pipelines, risers, subsea and surface equipment

Figure ES2 shows the vision, business cases, technology and competence areas, andprioritized areas for governmental funding for OG21 TTA1.

F igur e ES2:Vision, business cases, technology and competence areas, and prioritised

areas for governmental funding of OG21 TTA1.

Prioritized areas of governmental funded R&D

Environmental

Monitoring

Leak

Detection

Remote

Sensing

Energy

Efficiency

Technology for

Seismic

Operations

Oil Spill

Technologies

Drilling

technologies

Business Case 3Field Life Extension

Business Case 1Exploration & Development in

Environmentally SensitiveAreas

Business Case 2Barents Sea Gas & Condensate

Field Development

Become the most

energy efficientoil and gas

industry in the

world

Produced

Water

Technology

Natural

Environment &

Ecosystems

Modelling

Tools


9/39


10/39

1

1. IntroductionOG21 (www.OG21.org), Norways official strategy for the petroleum sector, issued inAugust 2010 a revised strategy document named Energy efficient and environmentallysustainable technologies (TTA1). This was identified as one of four new TTAs, each of

which incorporates individual sub-strategies. This document, TTA1, outlines the strategy forthe environmental technology and competence necessary to mature, prepare and allow for thedevelopment of the three business cases outlined herein. The strategies are all in line with theoverall vision and goal of the OG21.

2. Vision and goalsThe TTA1 vision is to support the Norwegian industry to become the most energy efficient oiland gas industry in the world. For Norway this means to continue to be the province with thehighest energy efficiency, lowest levels of harmful emissions to air, discharges to sea andsediments, and exposures to workers per produced oil and gas unit. The vision also includesincreased attention to technologies that assist in reducing the environmental impact fromaccidental oil spills to sea.

The business challenges on the NCS, both currently and in the future, have been evaluated,and the following three business cases have been viewed as the most important seen from aTTA1 perspective:

1) Exploration & Development in Environmentally Sensitive Areas2) Barents Sea Gas & Condensate Field Development

3)

Field Life Extension

The TTA1 strategy focuses on environmental technology and competence necessary to:

Attain the societysacceptance for continued growth and development of the oil andgas industry

Reduce the environmental footprint of existing fields, and minimise the footprint ofexploration and development in environmentally sensitive areas

Enhance the energy efficiency of E&P related work Reduce the environmental risk and improve the preventive measures to avoid

accidental oil spills, and minimise the damage if they occur

TTA1 has identified technology gaps and research needs that need to be met in order tocombat the challenges related to further development of oil and gas activities on the NCS.

The TTA1 vision is to support the Norwegian industry to become the most energy

efficient oil and gas industry in the world.

For each of the aforementioned challenges, R&D needs have been identified. And,correspondingly, the time perspective, cost level, criticality, and market value have beenrecognised for each of the R&D needs.
http://www.og21/http://www.og21/http://www.og21/


11/39

2

3. Business Case 1: Exploration & Development in EnvironmentallySensitive Areas

3.1. OverviewOn the NCS several restrictions apply to exploration activities, especially exploration drilling,in areas defined as environmentally sensitive.4 Environmentally sensitive areas are oftencharacterised by having high biological activity and diversity, being close to shore, importantareas for fishing and fish reproduction, and contain vulnerable marine ecosystems (e.g. coralreefs). Areas having high touristic value (scenery) are also included in the definition.Unopened areas such as Lofoten, Vesterlen, Jan Mayen, and the northern parts of the BarentsSea; ice edge locations; and a few already opened areas are examples of such sensitive areas.

These environmentally sensitive areas are also considered to hold a large proportion of the yetto find oil and gas reserves on the NCS. A report discussing the possible opening of theunopened areas in the northern part of the Norwegian Sea (the areas off Lofoten, Vesterlenand Senja) indicates that these areas could hold 202 million scm o.e. (approximately 1.4

billion barrels) (Norwegian Petroleum Directorate 2010).5

In order to be able to explore and develop these sensitive areas it is imperative to developenergy efficient and sustainable technologies as recommended in this TTA.

F igure 1:Erik Raude, a 5th generation drilling rig for Arctic and environmentally sensitive

areas (left); and Nordland, a typical area characterised as having a particularly sensitive

environment (right).

4Report No. 8 to the Storting (20052006) Integrated Management of the Marine Environment of the BarentsSea and the Sea Areas off the Lofoten Islands& Report No. 10 to the Storting (2010-2011) Updating of theIntegrated Management of the Marine Environment of the Barents Sea and the Sea Areas off the LofotenIslands.5

konomisk vurdering av uoppdagede petroleumsressurser i havomrdene utenfor Lofoten, Vesterlen ogSenja. NPD, 2010.http://www.npd.no/en/news/News/2011/The-shelf-2010--Press-releases/The-shelf-2010-Undiscovered-resources


12/39


13/39

4

day-to-day operations (e.g. multi-sensor data captured from several sensors and platforms,communication infrastructure, analysis, and interface).

Prevention of well incidents, intervention, and oil spill response capability is critical toaddress in any operation, but will be even more important in environmentally sensitive areas.

Responding to oil spills in new frontier areas (e.g. the Arctic, deep waters and/or close toshore) present new challenges that need to be addressed. New solutions should be able tooperate under rougher weather conditions, under lower temperatures, and in ice infested areas.

In the event of an oil spill, response managers must quickly select the most appropriateresponse tactic(s) (e.g.biodegradation, mechanical recovery, in situburning, and/or chemicaldispersion). The choice to implement a particular response strategy in a specific area should

be based on the efficiency and environmental effects of that particular response option underthe prevailing conditions. Therefore an information base outlining the contingency system

producing the lowest environmental impact is essential. It is thus important that theinformation base includes the capability of the response tactics in various situations; e.g.

weather conditions, presence of sensitive ecosystems, high touristic places, etc.

To be able to convey to the stakeholders that the industry is capable to respond to oil spillsunder various conditions, and possesses the technological advances to detect, contain andclean up spills, more innovative solutions needs to be presented. Oil spill contingency plansincluding chemical dispersants and in situburning are already in use, but should be developedfurther.

3.2.2. Exploration

Both during seismic operation and exploration drilling, safe and efficient informationgathering should be in focus to minimise the environmental risk. Gravimetric andelectromagnetic imaging, combined with acoustic based seismic, and the development of newinnovative technologies, should be improved in order to verify the presence and migration ofoil and gas, and marine mammals; e.g. viasatellite tracking and acoustic sensoring.

New well drilling methods in order to perform safer and more energy efficient drillingactivities should also be developed. Such technologies are also addressed by TTA3(Cost-efficient drilling and intervention); examples include:

Technology and methods to produce slender wells (reduced the hole diameter) toreduce the requirements for rig size, energy consumption, and minimise the cuttingsvolume and chemical usage. This implies reduced environmental footprint and a moreenergy efficient drilling technology.

Improve blowout prevention implement Best Available Technology and BestAvailable Practice in well engineering design and well operation management toreduce the likelihood of future incidents.

Develop new extended-reach technologies to reduce the need for rigs to be situatedclose to sensitive areas (e.g.deepwater corals, spawning and fishing areas).

Develop new cuttings disposal technologies that allow safe disposal in locations awayfrom vulnerable seabed habitats.


14/39

5

Involved personnel should receive continuous training in critical drilling operation scenariosusing realistic drilling simulations. Integrated operations using parallel control roomsconnecting the drilling rig and the onshore operation centre could also reduce the likelihood,impact, and extent of a well incident. Forecasting simulations based on well responses whilstdrilling could be a tool for early identification of well problems. Real-time information

systems should have high reliability to secure adequate and sufficient guidance and supportfrom company specialists on onshore locations.

New and innovative solutions to minimise the likelihood, impact and extent of well incidentssuch as well kicks and blowouts should be developed (suggested by TTA3). Additionally,new rig fluid handling systems that implement the use of efficient and effective chemicalsshould be developed so that these can operate in an environmentally friendly way.

Prevention of lost well control incidents will be one of the top priorities for the industry,therefore capping and containment systems should be developed, and made available as acontingency system if needed.

3.2.3. Development

Technology advancements for surface and subsea leak detection, including leak detectionfrom pipelines, injection wells and surrounding areas is critical. Ongoing work includes thedevelopment of methods/technologies for integrated environmental monitoring, which willenable flexible solutions (long-term and/or real-time) aligning environmental monitoring withthe industries day-to-day operations. Although many subsea installations have sensorsystems for leak detection, the reliability and robustness of these is not adequate.Furthermore, there is presently no qualified technology for leak detection from injection wellsavailable.

Figure 2:Technology developed for real-time hydrocarbon leak detection/monitoring

(left); AUVs for continuous inspection and monitoring of areas at risk for oil and gas

leakages; range of hundreds of kilometres, and various water depths (right).


15/39

6

Improved systems for mud and cutting handlings on site should be developed as an alternativeto transportation to shore. This will improve the energy efficiency of the drilling operations.Therefore, new and improved technologies for the re-use of mud and the injection of cuttingsinto subsea disposal wells are needed. Alternatively, methods for safe disposal of cuttingsaway from vulnerable habitats are needed.

Re-injection of operational discharges (i.e.produced water) is not always an option. Thereforework is needed on developing zero harmful discharge systems. Examples of new riskreducing technologies expected to be implemented are secondary containment systems (i.e.

pipe-in-pipe solutions), leakage detection systems, and integrity monitoring and assessmentsystems. It is further expected that technologies such as subsea processing and ultra longdistance well construction could reduce the risk for discharges to sea significantly.Technologies that allow for economical and safe field development in subsea tunnels andcavities up to approximately 50 km from shore, exist today, but should be further developed.

3.3. R&D NeedsThe following R&D needs have been grouped according to the challenges and technologygaps identified.

3.3.1. General R& D needs

Understanding the natural environment and the ecosystems

Improve knowledge of biological diversity and natural and seasonal variations inspecific environments, including ecosystem function and speciesinteractions.

Improve knowledge of the environmental effects of operational and acute dischargesto sea.

Remote sensing technologies

Develop remote sensing technologies for real-time mapping of biological resourcessuch as movements and/or migrations using e.g. satellite technologies, airbornecomputerised image recognition and/or unmanned aircrafts, remote and in situsensors.

Modelling tools

Develop ecological based tools to predict the potential impacts, and to simulate thestructural, functional, and cumulative impacts in the marine ecosystems (moving fromspecies to an ecosystem level).

Develop models and decision support tools that integrate expert knowledge, onlinemonitoring systems, site specific data, and local information on natural and seasonalvariations.

Continue to improve and integrate modelling tools for oil spills, species migration,ecosystems, meteorology, oceanography and biological impacts.


16/39

7

Environmental monitoring

Develop methods and technologies for integrated environmental monitoring, whichwill enable flexible solutions (long-term and/or real-time) aligning environmentalmonitoring with the industries day-to-day operations (e.g.multi-sensor data captured

from several sensors and platforms, communication infrastructure, analysis, andinterface).

Improve the robustness and reliability of real-time biological and environmentalmonitoring technologies, including systems for interpretations and integrations ofonline data into working processes linked to risk and impact modelling.

Oil spill technologies

Develop new, and continue to improve, current oil spill response systems addressingtechnology challenges when operating in: reduced visibility conditions (includingdarkness), strong currents and high sea states, areas with limited infrastructure, coldtemperatures, and near-shore areas.

Develop innovative solutions to detect, contain and clean up spills (mechanicalrecovery, chemical dispersants and in situburning).

Improved knowledge of the efficiency and environmental effects of the variousresponse options under the prevailing conditions.

3.3.2. R&D needs for Exploration

Technology for seismic operations

Develop new technologies for gravimetric and electromagnetic imaging, and acousticbased seismic technologies to verify the presence and migration of oil and gas.

Develop new, and improve existing, methods and tools to monitor the presence andmigration of marine mammals in relation to seismic activities, e.g. via satellitetracking and acoustic sensoring.

Drilling technologies

Develop technologies to reduce the hole diameter (i.e. drill slender wells) to reducethe requirements for rig size, improve energy efficiency of drilling, minimise the

cuttings volume and the use and discharge of chemicals. Improve and develop new systems for cutting handling as an alternative to

transportation to shore, e.g. technologies for injection of cuttings into a subseadisposal well or for safe disposal away from vulnerable habitats.

Improve existing and develop new technologies for integrated operations usingparallel control rooms connecting the drilling rig and the onshore operation centre.

Develop forecasting simulation tools based on well responses whilst drilling. Thiscould be a tool for early identification and mitigation of well problems.

Develop and implement new risk reducing technologies such as secondarycontainment systems (i.e. pipe-in-pipe solutions), leakage detection at the well head,

and integrity monitoring.


17/39

8

Improve, develop and implement new intervention capabilities through a contingencysystem for capping and containment (including subsea dispersant hardware). Suchsystems should be rapidly available at locations near the exploration areas.

3.3.3. R&D needs for Development


Develop real-time integrated onshore/offshore monitoring and modelling to minimiseeffect of regular operational discharges.

Leak detection

Improve systems for leak detection, including real-time monitoring and remote controlsystems for pipelines, risers, subsea and surface equipment.


18/39

9

4. Business Case 2: Barents Sea Gas & Condensate Field Development4.1. OverviewAt present time, the Barents Sea gas field development does not include tie-backs to existingexport pipeline infrastructure, hence near future developments will aim to produce andtransport liquefied natural gas (LNG), or compressed natural gas (CNG). A typical LNG

production/transportation scenario includes gas treatment onshore, with storage andtransportation similar to that of the Snhvit/Melkya development, except with an extendedstep-out to the offshore field.

F igure 3:Hammerfest LNG plant on

Melkya when receiving its first LNG-ship

in Dec 2006.

F igure 4:Typical subsea tie-back to

shore.

This business case postulates that up to 150-300 km of wet gas may be transported betweensubsea templates and onshore facilities, with the main technology gap related to the extendedstep-out. Offshore floating, and/or LNG and CNG processing, may be alternatives to wet gastransport to shore for remote fields.

The Norwegian Petroleum Directory (NPD) has estimated the total gas condensate reserves inthe Barents Sea to be approximately 800 BSm3. Environmental regulations may requireimproved and/or new technical solutions to enable development of these reserves and acquiresocietys acceptance of the operations.

4.2. Future Challenges and Technology GapsGas condensate development in the Barents Sea calls for a common scientific, industrial and

public understanding of the development in this region; and one that is energy andenvironmentally sustainable. This requires a holistic understanding of emissions anddischarges from all activities from well start-up through to production.

Developing safe operations in frontier areas with rough climate and low temperature is likelyto include subsea processing, long distance transport in pipelines and partial processing of

fluids and gas offshore. This requires contingency plans to limit and handle potential gas


19/39

10

condensate leakages. Real time leakage and performance control is also needed, as well asfast responding systems for leakages, and spill control of chemicals, gas and condensate.

4.3. R&D NeedsThe R&D needs have been grouped thematically, according to the challenges and technologygaps identified:

Understanding the natural environment and the ecosystems

Develop methods and tools for a holistic understanding of emissions and dischargesfrom all activities.

Develop methods and tools to illustrate the accumulated effects of differentenvironmental stresses on the ecosystem.

Leak detection

Develop leak control systems for gas, condensate and chemicals for long step-outsoffshore, subsea and downhole hydrocarbon processing.

Oil spill technologies

Develop safe, robust and fast responding systems for controlling chemical, gas andcondensate spill.


Improve systems to limit and control emissions to air (e.g.CO2, NOx, nmVOC). Improve condensate and water management systems to enable subsea and offshore

processing of condensate and chemicals.

Energy efficiency

Develop energy efficient systems for transporting gas and condensate.


20/39

11

5. Business Case 3: Field Life Extension5.1. OverviewAccording to the Oil and Energy Directory (OED) (2011)6there will be a drive to increase therecovery from Norwegian oil fields. This will require a combination of EOR/IOR measureson existing fields as well as tying in adjacent, smaller fields.

F igure 5:Valhall, operated by BP, is being developed in order to increase the fields

lifetime beyond the planned design. The field was originally built with three platforms,

but today the platform has eight platforms in total.

Some of the installations are of considerable age, and are in many cases limited by processing

capacity, i.e.water handling capacity. This implies a need to develop adjacent fields quicklywhilst maintaining compatibility with existing process equipment. This is to ensure that theintegrity of the installations, process equipment and transport facilities is unduly affected byoperation too far beyond their intended lifetime. By adding new production to the diminishingvolumes of older fields, the older fields will be able to increase their recovery in a profitablemanner.

5.2. Future Challenges and Technology GapsRemaining water handling capacity available for tie-ins from new fields is typically limited on

most installations, but the benefit of dry production from early removal of produced waterfrom the new production can greatly increase the chance for early tie-in. These benefitsinclude cost sharing and increased recovery factors on both fields. Common issues associatedwith adding new production from adjacent fields to existing production facilities include theability to extend operation of plant and equipment beyond its original design life and designcapacity. This can result in increased use of chemicals (for example to safeguard plantintegrity), and increased discharges of oil and chemicals to sea during normal operationalconditions.

6kt utvinning p norsk kontinentalsokkel, a report provided by the Ministry of Oil and Energy 2010.http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/OED/pdf%20filer/Oktutvinning.pdf


21/39


22/39

13

Leak detection

Improve systems for leak detection, including real-time monitoring and remote controlsystems for pipelines, risers, subsea and surface equipment.

Energy efficiency

Develop energy efficient and environmentally sustainable water treatment solutions totreat produced water containing polymers and surfactants, to meet acceptabledischarge and reinjection quality

Develop energy efficient systems for transporting gas and condensate Improve existing equipment to be able to extend their lifetime and performance, for

example by developing:- compact bottoming cycles (cycle that uses waste heat from the primary

generation cycle, i.e. a gas turbine, to generate further electricity) to moreefficiently generate electricity

-compact heat exchanger technology to improve heat integration opportunities(including the use of lower temperature heat sources for electricity generation)

- systems to generate power efficiently as both full and part load (i.e. turbinecycles that still operate efficiently when generating significantly less than theirdesigned power output)


23/39

14

6. R&D Priorities, Time frame and Funding for the most importantareas for value creation on the NCS

The R&D needs identified in chapters 3-5 have all been integrated into separate tablespresented in this chapter. For each of the thematic R&D areas, one table have been generated.

Each row represents one of the identified R&D needs, although the text has been shortened,and if the same R&D need has been identified more than once, they have been merged intoone row. Please refer to chapters 3-5 for description of the R&D needs.

In the tables, the estimated time needed for technology development, the assumed R&D costs,a criticality evaluation, an estimated market potential, the OG21 strategic goals covered,

barriers for the technology realisation and the priorities for industry and public funding havebeen indicated. Below can be found an explanation to the various terms:

Term Definition

Cost The total cost of development from idea to qualified technology

Criticality The need for addressing the technology gap in order to realise the business case

Market value The possibility of a global market for the technology gap

OG21 strategicgoal

Defined in the OG21 strategy document, where:

1) Value creation through production and reserve replacement with a reserve growth of5 bn boe before 2015.

2) Energy efficient and cleaner production: become the oil and gas province with the

highest energy efficiency, the lowest level of emissions to air, and lowest harmfuldischarges to sea per produced unit.

3) Value creation through increased export of technology: Continue the current growthpath with annual oil and gas technology sales of NOK 120 bn by 2012.

4) Value creation through employment and competence development: Sustain andfurther develop Norways position as a leading and competitive oil and gas technology

cluster.

Barrier The obstacles to realise the technology and bring it into application, where:

I = innovation

C = competence

D = demonstration

P = piloting

The priority for industry public funding has been assembled by leading experts from O&Gcompanies, manufactures and R&D institutes/universities. Their experience and expertise securesthe relevance and prioritized order of the list.


24/39

15

6.1. Table 1: Understanding the Natural Environment and the EcosystemsIdentified R&D need /

Technology Gap

Business

Case

R&D

time

Cost

(MNOK)

Criticality Market

value

OG21

strategic

goal

Barriers Priority

for

industry

funding

Priority

for

public

funding

Biological diversity, seasonal

variation, ecosystem function and

species interaction1 10 500 High Low 2,4 C/D 3 1

Environmental effects of

operational and acute discharges1,2 10 250 High Low 2,4 C/D 1 1

Methods for holistic understanding

of emissions and discharges1,2,3 10 100 Low Medium 2,4 C/D 3 2

Methods and tools to assess

accumulated effects of different

stressors on the ecosystem1,2,3 15 100 Medium Medium 2,4 C/D 2 2

6.2. Table 2: Remote Sensing TechnologiesIdentified R&D need /

Technology Gap

Business

Case

R&D

time

Costs

(MNOK)

Criticality Market

value

OG21

strategic

goal

Barriers Priority

for

industryfunding

Priority

for

publicfunding

Real time mapping of biological

resources, satellite technologies,

airborne image recognition,

remote and in situ sensors

1,3 10 500 Medium High 2,3,4 C/D/P 2 2


25/39

16

6.3. Table 3: Modelling ToolsIdentified R&D need /

Technology Gap

Business

Case

R&D

time

Costs

(MNOK)

Criticality Market

value

OG21

strategic

goal

Barriers Priority

for

industry

funding

Priority

for

public

funding

Ecological based tools to predict

and simulate structural and

functional changes and cumulative

impacts to the ecosystem

1,3 5 100 High Medium 2,4,3 C/I/D 1 2

Decision support tools integrating

expert knowledge, online

monitoring systems and site

specific information

1,2,3 5 100 Medium Medium 2,4 C/I/D 2 2

Oil spill and biological mobility

models1,3 5 100 Medium Medium 2,4,3 C/I/D 2 2

Reservoir souring models 3 10 500 High High 1,2,4,3 C/I/D 1 2


26/39

17

6.4. Table 4: Environmental MonitoringIdentified R&D need /

Technology Gap

Business

Case

R&D

time

Costs

(MNOK)

Criticality Market

value

OG21

strategic

goal

Barriers Priority

for

industry

funding

Priority

for

public

funding

Operation integrated

environmental monitoring

technologies (e.g.multi-sensor

data, communicationinfrastructure, and interface)

1,2,3 10 500 High Medium 2,4 C/I/D 1 2

Real-time integrated monitoring

and modelling systems to

minimise effect of operational

discharges.

1,3 5 100 High Medium 2,4 C/I/D 1 1

Improved systems to limit and

control emission to air1,3 15+ 5000 High High 2,1,4,3 C/I/D/P 1 1


27/39

18

6.5. Table 5: Leak DetectionIdentified R&D need /

Technology Gap

Business

Case

R&D

time

Costs

(MNOK)

Criticality Market

value

OG21

strategic

goal

Barriers Priority

for

industry

funding

Priority

for

public

funding

Systems for remote leak detection,

real time monitoring and control of

pipelines risers, injection wells,

subsea and surface equipment.

1,3 10 1000 High High 2,3,4 C/I/D 1 1

Leakage control systems for gas,

condensate and chemicals for long

distance, subsea and downhole

processing

2 10 500 High Medium 2,3,4 C/I/D 2 2


28/39

19

6.6. Table 6: Energy EfficiencyIdentified R&D need /

Technology Gap

Business

Case

R&D

time

Costs

(MNOK)

Criticality Market

value

OG21

strategic

goal

Barriers Priority

for

industry

funding

Priority

for

public

funding

Technologies for more energy

efficient transport of gas and

condensate2 10 1000 High Medium 3,2,4 C/I/D 1 1

More energy efficient watertreatment systems

3 5 500 Medium Medium 2,3,4 C/I/D 2 2

Improve existing equipment to

enable lifetime extension3 5 100 High Medium 1,3,4 C/D 1 2

Production methods to improve

energy efficiency3 5 100 High Medium 2,3,4 C/D 1 2

Compact bottoming cycles for

electricity generation3 5 100 Medium Medium 3,2,4 C/D 2 3

Compact heat exchange technology

for electricity generation3 5 500 Medium Medium 3,2,4 C/I/D 3 3

Systems for flexible power

generation3 5 100 High Medium 3,2,4 C/I/D 1 2


29/39

20

6.7. Table 7: Produced Water TechnologyIdentified R&D need /

Technology Gap

Business

Case

R&D

time

Costs

(MNOK)

Criticality Market

value

OG21

strategic

goal

Barriers Priority

for

industry

funding

Priority

for

public

funding

Fate and effect of EOR/IOR

chemicals3 5 100 High Medium 1,2,4,3 C/I/D 2 1

Fluid characteristics and

compatibility in PWT systems3 5 50 High Medium 1,2,4 C/D 1 2

Flexible produced water treatment

technologies 3 10 500 Medium Medium 1,3,2,4 C/I/D 2 3

Improved condensate and water

management technology and

systems.1,2,3 10 1000 High Medium 2,4,3 C/I/D/P 1 2

6.8. Table 8: Oil Spill Response TechnologiesIdentified R&D need /

Technology Gap

Business

Case

R&D

time

Costs

(MNOK)

Criticality Market

value

OG21

strategic

goal

Barriers Priority

for

industry

funding

Priority

for

public

funding

Improve existing oil spill response

systems for various conditions1,2,3 5 500 Medium High 2,1,3,4 C/I/D/P 2 2

New solutions to detect, contain

and clean up spills1,2,3 10 1000 High High 2,1,3,4 C/I/D/P 1 1

Efficiency & environmental effects

of the various response options1,2,3 5 500 High Medium 2,3,4 C/I/D 1 2

Safe, robust and fast responding

systems to control chemical, gas

and condensate spills.2 10 250 Medium Medium 2,4,3 C/I 2 2


30/39

21

6.9. Table 9: Technology for Seismic OperationsIdentified R&D need /

Technology Gap

Business

Case

R&D

time

Costs

(MNOK)

Criticality Market

value

OG21

strategic

goal

Barriers Priority

for

industry

funding

Priority

for

public

funding

Gravimetric and electromagnetic

imaging, acoustic based seismic

acquisition1 10 500 High Medium 1,3,4,2 C/I/D 1 2

Technologies to monitor marinemammals

1,2 10 500 Medium Medium 2,3,4 C/I/D 2 2

6.10. Table 10: Drilling TechnologiesIdentified R&D need /

Technology Gap

Business

Case

R&D

time

Costs

(MNOK)

Criticality Market

value

OG21

strategic

goal

Barriers Priority

for

industry

funding

Priority

for

public

funding

Drill slender wells 1,2,3 5 1000 High High 1,3,2,4 C/I/D 1 2

Cuttings handling i.einjection and

disposal1,2,3 5 100 Medium Medium 3,2,4 C/I/D 2 2

Drilling operations using parallel

control rooms1,2,3 5 500 High High 4,2,3 C/I/D 1 2

Forecasting simulations based onwell responses whilst drilling 1,2,3 5 500 High High 4,2,3 C/I/D/P 1 2

Secondary containment, leakage

detection at the well head, and well

integrity monitoring1,2,3 10 1000 Medium Medium 4,2,3 C/I/D 2 2

Capping and containment

technologies and systems1,2,3 5 5000 High High 1,4,3,2 C/I/D 1 2


31/39

22

7. Roadmap for the futureA road map for the future, regarding Energy efficient and environmentally sustainabletechnologies, is illustrated in Figure 6 below.

F igure 6:Energy efficient and environmentally sustainable technologies

A road map for the future.


32/39

23

8. Link to other TTAsEnvironmental technology should be incorporated into all technology development to obtainenergy efficient and environmental sustainable development, and it is expected that several ofthe projects discussed in the other TTAs will cover similar needs that have been identified

within this report. The identified interfaces are listed inTable 6.

The main objective of listing interfaces to the other TTAs is to maintain consistency, and toensure important technology gaps have not been adressed. There is no conflict in overlapping

priorities.

Item Relevance for other TTAs

CO2value chain TTA2 - Exploration and Increased RecoveryEnergy21 CCS report by Climit

Drilling technologies, includingcuttings handlingCapping and containment systems

TTA3 - Cost-Efficient Drilling and Intervention

Processing technologies, leak detection,and on-line oil-in-water monitoring

TTA4 - Future Technologies for Production,Processing and Transportation

Leak detection TTA4 - Future Technologies for Production,Processing and TransportationTTA3 - Cost-efficient Drilling and Intervention

Chemicals TTA2 - Exploration and Increased RecoveryEnergy efficiency TTA2 - Exploration and Increased Recovery

TTA3 - Cost-efficient Drilling and Intervention

TTA4 - Future Technologies for Production,Processing and TransportationTable 6:Interfaces with other TTA groups


33/39

24

9. RecommendationsPriorities have been listed in order of importance with particular emphasis on technologicalissues that will need governmental support, either for initialisation, acceleration ordevelopment of competences. R&D needs that are industry-funded, or covered by existing

initiatives, have not been included in this report.

The focus areas are:1. Develop methods to improve the energy efficiency of offshore operations as well

as transport of oil and gas2. Improve knowledge of real-time integrated monitoring and modelling systems3. Systems to limit and control emissions to air4. Increase the fundamental understanding of the fate and effects of EOR/IOR

chemicals, including produced water treatment5. Improve knowledge and understanding of the natural environment and the

ecosystems

6.

Develop new and continue to improve oil spill response systems7. Improve systems for leak detection, including real time monitoring and remote

control systems for pipelines, risers, subsea and surface equipment

A review of on-going activity shows there is a need for improved energy efficiency for the oiland gas industry throughout all phases such as exploration, development, production andabandonment. Recent acute spills e.g. Macondo in the GoM, events have also shown the needfor better spill response systems.

It appears to be a lack of knowledge about the effects from operational and acute discharges,which may be the cause for not opening for oil and gas exploration in new sensitive areas.Increased focus on environmental monitoring is a key, and real-time integrated monitoringand modelling systems should be prioritized

There is still an apparent lack of initiatives to address a holistic approach to environmentalissues, i.e.balancing emissions to air, discharges to sea, and waste management. Stakeholderfocus and efforts to create awareness must be emphasised. It is imperative to create a positive

public perception, and this can be achieved via communicating the standards and trackrecords of the business, and the exciting future opportunities. This is vital to improve public

perception and recruitment to the industry.

In order to promote, and strengthen, the position of the Norwegian oil and gas industry,developing environmental legislation and technology is crucial. To achieve this, emphasis oncooperation between authorities, research facilities and industry is needed. Continuousinnovation and development is important to attract international companies, to support exportof world leading environmental technologies.


34/39

25

10. Appendices10.1. List of participants in TTA1The TTA1 group consists of the following experts from the Norwegian Petroleum Cluster:

10.2.

Ongoing R&D activities

These appendices give an overview of the main research and development activities relevantto the work presented herein. The overview does not provide a complete set of information, asit is merely meant as an indication as to where activity related to this report is ongoing.

R&D with regards to process technologies is mainly performed by the companies, or co-funded through PETROMAKS and/or Demo2000. Research concerned with environmentalimpacts is accomplished through both national and international research programs funded byvarious companies and research institutions. These include, amongst others, the NorwegianOil Industry Association (OLF), the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy, the Ministry of

Environment, the RCN and Gassnova (Innovation centre for gas and CO2 capturetechnologies located under the Dept. Oil and Energy).

Name Company

Odd Willy Brude DnV

Karl Kristensen Bellona

Ingun Hovland Norske Shell

Hanne Greiff Johnsen Statoil

Stle Johnsen Statoil

Eimund Garpestad ConocoPhillip

Anne Gunn Rike NGI

Ivar Singsaas SINTEF

Stein Erik Srstrm SINTEF

Helge Skjveland Norske Shell (lead party)

Eilen Arctander Vik Aquateam

Espen Hoell Proactima

Anne Hjelle IRIS

Nina Christine Kirkeng Aker Solutions


35/39

26

Table A1: On-going R&D related to Energy efficient and environmentally sustainable

technologies(awaiting updated data from the NRC)

Challenge Relevant R&DMeeting /anticipating newlegislation

PETROMAKS

Havet og Kysten including Proof/ProofNy (Continuation of Proof as asub-program in Havet og Kysten)Research going on within companies:Produced waterBiological effects and monitoringOn-line oil in water measurements - development of methods/equipmentTreatment - separation technologies

New areas MAROFF is RCNs programme related to MARUT, where the objective ofthe innovation area of KALDKLIMA is to secure planning andaccomplishment of sustainable maritime operations in areas of coldclimate.Havet og Kysten including Proof/ProofNy (Continuation of Proof as asub-program in Havet og Kysten)SeapopEffects on mammals from noise from operational petroleum activities (JIPunder OGP)KALDKLIMA also focuses on oil spill response technology (equipment,strategy, dispersants, surveillance, decision support tools)

Norwegian Deepwater Program (NDP)JIPs on oil spills mainly lead by SINTEFJIPs on biological effects and monitoring lead by IRIS (e.g. BioSeaTotaland Eni)

Holistic HSEapproachCarbon captureand storage

A large number of R&D programs are related; examples include (EU andNorway only):CCP Phase III (Norway, EU, US): The project seeks to develop newtechnologies to reduce the cost of capturing CO2 from combustion sources,

and safely store it underground.DECARBIT. Enabling advanced pre-combustion capture techniques andplants.CESAR aims for a breakthrough in the development of low-cost post-combustion CO2 capture technology to provide economically feasiblesolutions for both new power plants, and to reprofit existing power plantsresponsible for the majority of all anthropogenic CO2 emissions.CO2EUROPIPE. This project aims at paving the road towards large-scale,Europe-wide infrastructure for the transport and injection of CO2 fromzero-emission plants into where?ECCSEL. The ECCSEL consortium teams up selected Centres of

Excellence on CCS across Europe (Norway, Poland, France, Italy,Germany, Spain, Greece, UK, Netherlands and Switzerland). The mission
http://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=Page&cid=1226993690932&p=1226993690932&pagename=petromaks%2FHovedsidemalhttp://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=Page&cid=1226994156376&p=1226994156376&pagename=havkyst%2FHovedsidemalhttp://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=Page&cid=1226994156376&p=1226994156376&pagename=havkyst%2FHovedsidemalhttp://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=Page&cid=1226994156376&p=1226994156376&pagename=havkyst%2FHovedsidemalhttp://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=Page&pagename=proof%2FHovedsidemal&cid=1232959446424http://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=Page&pagename=proof%2FHovedsidemal&cid=1232959446424http://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=MidlerParent&cid=1107980695306&pagename=ForskningsradetNorsk%2FMidlerParent%2FVisMedDenneTilhorighethttp://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=MidlerParent&cid=1107980695306&pagename=ForskningsradetNorsk%2FMidlerParent%2FVisMedDenneTilhorighethttp://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=MidlerParent&cid=1107980695306&pagename=ForskningsradetNorsk%2FMidlerParent%2FVisMedDenneTilhorighethttp://ohttp//www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?cid=1088801820049&pagename=proof%2FPage%2FHovedSide&site=proofhttp://www.ndwp.org/http://www.ndwp.org/http://www.ndwp.org/http://www.ndwp.org/http://ohttp//www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?cid=1088801820049&pagename=proof%2FPage%2FHovedSide&site=proofhttp://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=MidlerParent&cid=1107980695306&pagename=ForskningsradetNorsk%2FMidlerParent%2FVisMedDenneTilhorighethttp://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=Page&pagename=proof%2FHovedsidemal&cid=1232959446424http://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=Page&cid=1226994156376&p=1226994156376&pagename=havkyst%2FHovedsidemalhttp://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=Page&cid=1226993690932&p=1226993690932&pagename=petromaks%2FHovedsidemal


36/39

27

is to develop (i.e. build and operate) an European distributed, goal-oriented, integrated Research Infrastructure.ECCO. The main objective is to facilitate robust strategic decision makingregarding early and future implementation of CO2 value chains for Europein the face of uncertainty (unclear!)

CACHET II. The project will develop innovative metallic membranes andmodules for high capacity H2 production and separation from a number offuel sources, including natural gas and coal.iCap. An R&D project where the objective is to develop new CO2 capturetechnologies that will enable highly efficient and cost effective productionof electrical power from fossil fuels with nearly zero emissions. The targetis to reduce the CO2 capture energy penalty to 4-5% points.CO2Remove (EU): The monitoring and verification of geological storageof CO2.CO2 Geonet (EU): Network of excellence on geological storage of CO2.ZEP (EU). Identify and remove obstacles to the creation of highly efficient

power plants with near-zero emissions, which will reduce theenvironmental impact of fossil fuels; includes CCS.

A more detailed list of R&D projects is available viathe following link:http://www.ieaghg.org/

In addition to technical R&D areas, the legal aspects of CO2 injection arenot fully understood (Ospar and London Dumping Convention). Work isongoing to clarify this aspect.

CLIMIT is the Norwegian research programme for accelerating thecommercialisation of CCS by financial stimulation of research,development and demonstration. The program now includes CCS in fossilfuel-based power generation and industrial point source emissions. The

programme is managed by Gassnova in cooperation with the ResearchCouncil of Norway.

FME (Centre for Environment-friendly Energy Research). Developexpertise and promote innovation through long-term research in selectedareas of environment-friendly energy, transport and CO2 management.FMEs related to CCS:SUCCESS (SINTEF Energy Research)

BIGCCS (CMR)Public

perception andrecruitment

An issue being tackled by several stakeholder groups, including the OG21board, and individual companies.

Promoteinternationalcooperation,establishtechnologycluster and

support exportof technology

Demo 2000
http://www.ieaghg.org/http://www.climit.no/http://www.climit.no/http://www.climit.no/infosenter-2/prosjektportefolje/?publish_id=1323&active=1323#gassnovahttp://www.climit.no/infosenter-2/prosjektportefolje/?publish_id=1323&active=1323#gassnovahttp://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=Page&cid=1224698003641&pagename=climit%2FHovedsidemalhttp://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=Page&cid=1224698003641&pagename=climit%2FHovedsidemalhttp://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=Page&cid=1222932140914&pagename=energisenter%2FHovedsidemalhttp://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=Page&cid=1222932140914&pagename=energisenter%2FHovedsidemalhttp://www.demo2000.no/http://www.demo2000.no/http://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=Page&cid=1222932140914&pagename=energisenter%2FHovedsidemalhttp://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=Page&cid=1224698003641&pagename=climit%2FHovedsidemalhttp://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=Page&cid=1224698003641&pagename=climit%2FHovedsidemalhttp://www.climit.no/infosenter-2/prosjektportefolje/?publish_id=1323&active=1323#gassnovahttp://www.climit.no/http://www.ieaghg.org/


37/39


38/39

29

AS) Aminavfall fra CO2-fjerning - utvikling av behandlingslsninger

(Lindum Ressurs,Gjenvinning AS) VOC-REDUKSJON, LAGERTANKER (ide til produkt as) Utvikle et anti-korrosjon vannbehandlingsanlegg (Forus Engineering AS)

RotaChoke produktutvikling, redusert forurensning offshore - alternativertil elektrifisering (Energreen AS)

Automatisk utskilling av vske i lasttanker (Ariston Norway AS) Behandling av vann i rr og tanker i oljeindustrien (Nordic Deep Force

Company) Stvfri big bag unit (TTS SENSE MUD AS) Biota Guard Arctic (BIOTA GUARD AS) OPFU - Oil Purifier & Flush Unit (TOOL TECH AS) Produktutvikling Miljvennlige Smremidler (LANOPRO

PRODUCTION AS)

Utvikling og realisering av helt ny behandlingsmetode for behandling avavfallsvsker (SAR AS) LNG for the Future: "Zero Emission LNG Regasification Terminal"

(AKER ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY AS) Katamaran for Oljeoppsamling nr kysten (NORDNORSK

SKIPSKONSULT AS) Offshore spesialskip (NORDNORSK SKIPSKONSULT AS)Nye teknologier som p en unik og kostnadseffektiv mte lser vr tids

aktuelle miljutfordringer (NISTAD GRUPPEN AS) Effektive og mobile PVC-baserte oljelenser System for oppvarming av oljeemulsjon under

oljeoppsamlingsoperasjoner (KA-PRE NORGE AS)NOFI Coast Buster (Hovedprosjekt) (NOFI TROMS AS) Mera Hydraulic Oil Cleaner (MERA AS)Ny Lense 2008 (NORLENSE AS) OilShaver (KREHAMN TRLBTERI AS) Reduksjon av oljeinnhold i borekaks (MOMEK GROUP AS) Design, testing og konstruksjon av et farty for bruk i oljevern i

strandsonen (TEAM INNOVATION TRONDHEIM AS) Kjemi- og metodeutvikling SafeClean (SAFECLEAN AS) Vakuum transport system for borekaks (CUBILITY AS)Nye materialer og varmeoverfringskonsept for katalytisk resirkuleringav CO2(RCO2 AS)

Justerbar oljelense (R J RYGG INTERNATIONAL AS) Containertmmer og vasker for boreavfall (OE SOLUTIONS AS) Ventil for utskilling av boreavfall fra vakum/trykkluft-rr-transport

(SAFE SUPPLY AS) Reduco2 (NTNU TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AS) Isolering av oljeforurensning med naturlige polymerer (OIL

PROTECTION AS) Kompakte lettvekts oljeskimmere (NOREN BERGEN AS)

Nedbrytning av komplekse materialer 1 (JI NANO TITAN AS)

ROLS X.0 (FRANK MOHN FLATY AS)


39/39

Nye moderne analysemetoder for mling av produksjonskjemikalier iborevann, kjlemedier og sjvann (VITAS AS)

Utvikling av Olje i Vann mler og Turbiditetsmler for prosesstyringunder hye trykk (PRO ANALYSIS AS)

Computational modelling of ultra low Nox combustion

(COMPUTATIONAL INDUSTRY TECHNOLOGIES AS) Monitorering av lagret CO2 elektromagnetiske malinger (EMTEK AS) Brannbeskyttelse for offshore komponenter, GREEN BOX (KAEFER

ENERGY AS) Teknologiutviklingsprogram oljevern 2010 (LIEGRUPPEN AS) Marine Oil Spill Sweeper (MD GROUP AS)NEMS analyse og prognoseverkty (ADD NOVATECH AS)

tta1strategyrev1nov2011a

Documents