v4n3_heid

Upload: sekarjoshua

Post on 02-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/11/2019 v4n3_heid

    1/14

    CTSJ4:3 (July 1998) p. 31

    Dispensational Theology

    Phillip Heideman, Th.M. *

    Chafer Theological Seminary

    [*Editors note: Phillip Heideman earned his B.B.A. degree at the

    University of Wisconsin, a Th.M. degree in New TestamentLiterature and Exegesis from Dallas Theological Seminary, and

    has done work toward a Th.D. at DTS. He has been a pastor,

    educator, and conducts the correspondence division of studies at

    Chafer Theological Seminary. ]

    The purpose of this article is to present a view similar to what Dr. Lewis

    Sperry Chafer taught on the subject and to identify some weaknesses in traditional

    Dispensational theology. This author holds firmly to Dispensational theology,

    since that is the only system of theology that adequately accounts for thedifferences from one time period to another and from one testament to another.

    Therefore, this article will uphold the distinctives and essential features of

    Dispensationalism but present a different focus, a different basis for naming them,and suggest a few additional Dispensations. This article does not consider either

    progressive or ultradispensationalism.

    Definition of Dispensationalism

    Dr. Charles Ryrie cites Clarence Mason for his definition.

    Dispensation means a stewardship or administration. In the Biblea dispensation is a divinely established stewardship of a particular

    revelation of Gods mind and will which brings addedresponsibility to the whole race of mankind or a particular portion

    of the human race.1

    Another definition cited by Ryrie goes like this, A dispensation is Gods

    distinctive method of governing mankind or a group of men during a period ofhuman history, marked by a crucial test, failure, and judgment.

    2

    The first definition emphasizes stewardship, and the second one emphasizesGods governing. Since both definitions have some merit, I included both.

    1Charles C. Ryrie,Dispensationalism,revised and expanded (Chicago: Moody Press 1995), 30.2Ibid., 30.

  • 8/11/2019 v4n3_heid

    2/14

    The Distinctives of Dispensationalism

    The main distinctives of Dispensationalism are, first, the consistent use of the

    grammatical-historical hermeneutic; second, the distinction between Israel and theChurch; and, third, the reign of Jesus Christ and His saints in the Millennial

    Kingdom. The latter is the goal toward which God providentially works in humanhistory. The fourth distinctive is that the unifying thread from the beginning to theend of the biblical record is the manifestation of Gods attributes, namely, His

    love, justice, faithfulness, and sovereignty. In particular, God demonstrates

    throughout the ages that He is in control, although

    CTSJ4:3 (July 1998) p. 32

    there are periods of time when it may not appear that way. These elements are

    essential for seeing the continuity and progression of Scripture and for

    understanding the major areas of Truth revealed in the Word of God.

    Features of Dispensationalism

    There are many features of Dispensationalism, which Dr. Ryrie mentions inhis latest book,Dispensationalism. Some of them are summarized below, beingderived from the Parable of the Unfaithful Steward (Luke 16) and from some

    Pauline uses of the words oikonomeo, oikonomos, and oikonomia. These concern

    the administration of a household, i.e., a stewardship.

    1. There are two parties, one who is in authority and delegates duties, and the

    steward who must carry out these duties.

    2. There are specific responsibilities and accountability.

    3. Men are responsible to God for the faithful discharge of their duties.

    4. The stewardship may end either when the steward is found unfaithful, or at

    the time appointed by God.3

    This author concurs with the above features.

    Traditional Dispensationalism

    Traditional Dispensationalism sees various ways in which mankind is testedby God throughout history, beginning with the Garden of Eden and culminating in

    the Millennial Kingdom. Each Dispensation has an essential individual, who isthe recipient of new revelation (i.e. Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Paul, etc). In

    each Dispensation, God gives mankind a certain responsibility, and after human

    failure, the Lord terminates the Dispensation with some form of judgment.

    3See Ryrie,Dispensationalism, 2527.

  • 8/11/2019 v4n3_heid

    3/14

    After the fall, God tested man through his conscience, the ability to know

    right from wrong. Due to the failure of mankind, God judged the human race bymeans of a flood. Following the flood came the Noahic Covenant, and God tested

    man through civil government, and commanded man to disperse throughout the

    earth. Mankind failed that test, which culminated at the Tower of Babel, where

    God created numerous languages that confused the people. Following this failureand judgment, God called out Abraham and gave him promises. Therefore, we

    call the next Dispensation the Dispensation of Promise. Their responsibility

    during this Dispensation was to remain in the Promised Land, and we see theirfailure in their leaving the land on more than one occasion, finally ending up in

    Egypt where the Lord judged them with Egyptian oppression. This Dispensation

    continued until the time of Moses, to whom the Lord gave the Law. The giving ofthe Law to Moses commenced the Age of the Law, which continued until the First

    Advent of Christ. The judgment on Israel for disobeying the Law and rejecting

    their

    CTSJ4:3 (July 1998) p. 33

    Messiah was the fall of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. and the worldwide dispersion thatfollowed. Following the Age of the Law is the Age of Grace, in which mankind is

    offered eternal life by faith in Christ. Mans rejection of this offer results in thejudgment of the Tribulation. I have not discussed the Dispensation of Innocence

    or the Dispensation of the Kingdom, which are the first and last, but the above

    discussion should be sufficient to see the pattern.4

    To sum up, in Traditional Dispensationalism God has a governing relationshipwith the world, whereby He gives responsibilities to mankind. There is always

    human failure and the Dispensations end with divine judgment.5Ryrie does

    acknowledge that the human responsibility is two-fold, namely the governmentaleconomy and salvation.

    6Moreover, though there seems to be an overemphasis on

    human failure and divine judgment, Clarence Mason, whom I cited above,

    acknowledges that there are also promises of blessing and reward for obedience tothe faith.

    7

    A Different Focus

    This article proposes three changes in the presentation of Dispensationalism

    that differ from the traditional perspective. The first difference is the focus of

    Dispensationalism. Despite agreeing with Ryrie and numerous other scholars thatthe term Dispensation means a stewardship and involves a governing relationship

    between God and the human administrator(s), I see different recipients of the

    stewardships. It seems that the Dispensations are stewardships that God entrustsexclusively to His own people during the various periods of human history. In

    4Ibid.,52-56.5Ibid.,33-35.6Ibid., 35.7Ibid., 30.

  • 8/11/2019 v4n3_heid

    4/14

  • 8/11/2019 v4n3_heid

    5/14

    Until a person is born into the family of God by faith in the saving message

    from God, we cannot expect him to respond in obedience to the will of God forhis life!

    Dispensations are stewardships, which God entrusts to His own people. The

    stewardship includes responsibilities, divine enablement, and accountability. Theaccountability can result in both rewards for faithfulness and chastisement forunfaithfulness. This necessitates new revelation for each Dispensation.

    The only exception to this is the unbeliever who has a stewardship by virtue of

    his office, e.g., a king. Yet, because of his unregenerate condition, he is unfaithfulto his stewardship. A New Testament example is Judas Iscariot who held the

    office of apostle, but was unregenerate.

    CTSJ4:3 (July 1998) p. 35

    Number and Names of the Dispensations

    Although the number and names of the Dispensations may vary, TraditionalDispensationalism generally presents seven different Dispensations with these

    respective names: the Dispensation of Innocence, followed by the Dispensations

    of Conscience, Civil Government, Promise, Mosaic Law, Grace, and theMillennial Kingdom.

    10The reason for these names is that Dispensational scholars

    see each of these as the predominate way in which God dealt with mankind in

    each respective period of time.11

    There are several inconsistencies in this scheme,as we will see next.

    First, there is the lack of consistency in the names themselves and also some

    false implications. Innocence views mans standing before God before the Fall.Conscience looks at a facet of the soul and implies that mankind had no otherrevelation to go by. Human government is an institution established by God.

    Promise and Law are particular revelations from God, which became part of the

    written Word of God. Grace is a way that God deals with mankind. Moreover,Law might imply the lack of grace, and Grace might imply the lack of law. Both

    are false implications. The Millennium is an era of history. Furthermore, during

    the Ages of Law and Grace there are far more promises given by God than duringthe Age of Promise.

    Moreover, according to Ryries chart on page 54 ofDispensationalism, one ofthe tests in the Age of Grace is faith in Christ. That would lead one to think that

    each Dispensation has its own test for entrance into Gods eternal kingdom.Moreover, in most, if not all cases, the test includes some system of good

    works/obedience. Certainly, Dr. Ryrie along with others who agree with his

    position, if asked, would acknowledge that salvation always has been and alwayswill be by faith in God/Christ and that Dispensationalism is not teaching different

    10Ryrie, 5157.11Ibid., 52.

  • 8/11/2019 v4n3_heid

    6/14

  • 8/11/2019 v4n3_heid

    7/14

    Covenant applying to the Church at the present time and to Israel as a nation in

    the future.12

    This author prefers the third view, which was also the view of C. I.Scofield: It secures perpetuity, future blessing, and eternal blessedness to Israel,

    and eternal blessedness to all who believe.13

    A consistent use of the grammatical historical hermeneutic leads to theconclusion that the New Covenant, which Christ introduced at the Last Supperand established by His death, is now currently in effect.

    Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the New

    Testament in my blood, which is shed for you (Luke 22:20).

    The apostle Paul quotes this saying of Christ as well.

    CTSJ4:3 (July 1998) p. 37

    After the same manner also He took the cup, when He had supped,

    saying, This cup is the New Testament in My blood: this do, asoften as you drink it, in remembrance of Me (1 Corinthians 11:25).

    The same apostle was a servant of the New Covenant.

    Who also hath made us able ministers of the New Testament; not

    of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter kills, but the spirit gives

    life (2 Corinthians 3:6).

    The absence of definite articles with the words new, letter, and spiritpoints to an emphasis on quality or the character of the New Covenant rather than

    its identity, though the identity of all three nouns is clear.

    That the New Covenant is currently in effect, the book of Hebrews makesclear.

    Now hath He obtained a more excellent ministry, by how muchalso He is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established

    upon better promises (Hebrews 8:6).

    For this cause He is the mediator of the New Testament, that bymeans of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were

    under the first testament, they which are called might receive thepromise of eternal inheritance (Hebrews 9:15).

    Note the past and present tenses in the above verses from Hebrews. See alsoHebrews 10:1118.

    12Pentecost, Things to Come, 121124.13C. I. Scofield, editor, Scofield Reference Bible, 1297.

  • 8/11/2019 v4n3_heid

    8/14

    Romans 11 teaches that Israel is currently cut off from their own tree of

    covenant blessings, and that the Church, which includes a remnant of saved Jews,has been grafted into that tree and is partaking of the covenant blessings. At the

    Second Advent, Israel as a nation will believe in Christ and will be grafted in

    again.

    So all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out ofSion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:

    For this is My covenant unto them, when I shall take away their

    sins (Romans 11:26).

    Note the particular covenant blessing singled out is redemption, which soundslike the New Covenant of Jeremiah 31:3134.

    I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more

    (Jeremiah 31:34).

    To sum up, Jeremiah promised Israel a newcovenant relationship with God.The death of Christ established this covenant. However, because the nation Israel

    rejected Christ as their Messiah, they lost (temporarily) their

    CTSJ4:3 (July 1998) p. 38

    covenant relationship with God. Currently the Church, consisting of regenerateJews and Gentiles, enjoys a covenant relationship with God under the New

    Covenant. At the Second Advent, Israel as a nation will repent and they willindividually trust in Christ. Consequently, the Lord will regraft them into their

    former covenant relationship with God to partake of the New Covenant blessings

    along with the redeemed of other Dispensations.

    This parallels the Abrahamic Covenant that promises both national blessings

    for Israel and salvation blessings for all who believe. This in no way denies thatthe Church is the Body of Christ, consisting of all believers from the Day of

    Pentecost to the Rapture, being entirely distinct from the nation Israel.

    Moral Will of God

    One other reason for watering down Dispensational distinctions, as some do,is the apparent continuity of the Ten Commandments (with the exception of the

    Sabbath). The Ten Commandments reveal the moral will of God, which isabsolute and transcends Dispensational boundaries. For example, the Ten

    Commandments address both murder and adultery as violations of the moral will

    of God. Later, in the Book of Proverbs, much is said about the mental attitude ofpeople, including anger and lust. In the Sermon on the Mount, Christ went beyond

    the overt acts of murder and adultery to talk about anger and lust. So even within

    a given Dispensation, there is an expansion of the revealed moral will of God.

  • 8/11/2019 v4n3_heid

    9/14

  • 8/11/2019 v4n3_heid

    10/14

    of prayer have changed slightly, because we now pray to the Father in Jesus

    name (see the article by Curtis Mitchell in this same volume). This was not thecase before the Dispensation of the Church.

    Previously you have asked nothing in My name: ask, and you shall

    receive, that your joy may be full (John 16:24).

    Our system of theology must recognize the continuity of the requirements of

    faith and prayer as well as the differences from Dispensation to Dispensation. Wemay extend the matter of continuity and distinctions to other areas of Christian

    living as well.

    Evangelism

    Another responsibility stays the same from Dispensation to Dispensation andthat is world evangelism. The exception to this is the first Dispensation, in whichman had no need of the gospel message. However, since the fall of man God has

    perpetuated the promise of a coming redeemer from generation to generation andfrom Dispensation to Dispensation. The duty of the Church is to proclaim that

    Christ has come, died for our sins, and rose again for the salvation of all mankind.

    The Common Thread

    While God uses His people to administer His plan on the earth, He also

    sovereignly superintends human history to achieve His goal. His aim is that HisMan will rule over this world, just as Adam did before the fall. Throughout

    history, God keeps manifesting His attributes to the entire human race, whether

    people see it that way or not. His love, His omnipotence, His omniscience, His

    righteousness and justice, His faithfulness, and His sovereignty,CTSJ4:3 (July 1998) p. 40

    He manifests in numerous ways. There are constants such as creation and

    preservation, and there are variables, such as His providential dealings with

    individuals and nations. Moreover, there is always the proclamation of the Wordof God including the salvation message. Throughout history God delivers people

    out of the devils kingdom into His own Kingdom, and they publicly testify

    concerning what God has done in their own lives.

    In other words, God reveals His attributes through saving people in every

    Dispensation. God also reveals His attributes through transforming the lives ofHis people. God reveals His attributes by superintending the course of history and

    particularly in preserving the nation of Israel, so that sometime in the future Hemay fulfill the covenants and promises that He made with this nation.

    Furthermore, God reveals wisdom and power through the universe that He created

    and continues to preserve.

  • 8/11/2019 v4n3_heid

    11/14

    Gods Goal in History

    In the Dispensation of Adam and Eve, the Lord entrusted Adam with rulership

    over this earth. Adam lost that rulership when he sinned. In the Dispensation ofIsrael, Jesus Christ was the Head of State, but Israel eventually rejected this

    theocracy, demanding a king over them to be like other nations. In theDispensation of the Church, Jesus Christ reigns over the Church from the RightHand of the Father. This is not a fulfillment of the Davidic Covenant. Rather He

    is the Great High Priest according to the Order of Melchizedek. In the

    Millennium, Jesus Christ will reign over the nation of Israel on the DavidicThrone in fulfillment of that covenant.

    For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the

    government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be

    called Wonderful, Counselor, The mighty God, The everlastingFather, The Prince of Peace. Of the increase of his government and

    peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon hiskingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and withjustice from henceforth even for ever. The zeal of the LORD of

    hosts will perform this (Isaiah 9:6).

    Behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son,

    and shalt call his name JESUS. He shall be great, and shall becalled the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto

    him the throne of his father David: And he shall reign over the

    house of Jacob forever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end(Luke 1:31).

    He will also reign over the entire world and His Church will reign with Him.

    He that overcomes, and keeps my works unto the end, to him will Igive power over the nations: And he shall

    CTSJ4:3 (July 1998) p. 41

    rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be

    broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father (Revelation

    2:26).

    His reign will even extend to the angelic realm and He gives His Churchauthority over angels, at least to judge them:Do you not know that we shall judge

    angels (1 Corinthians 6:3)?

    The Dispensations

    There is a generic stewardship for believers in each Dispensation. Thesestewardships progress as the Dispensation progresses. Moreover, there are distinct

  • 8/11/2019 v4n3_heid

    12/14

    individual stewardships in each Dispensation. It is the generic and the progressive

    stewardship that makes one Dispensation distinct from another. Following are theDispensations in outline form.

    A. Dispensation of Adam and Eve (Genesis 13)

    B. Dispensation of Believing Gentiles (Genesis 411)

    1. Adam

    2. Abel

    3. Enoch

    4. Noah

    5. Noahs sons

    C. Dispensation of Israel (Genesis 12-Acts 1, excluding John 1317)

    1. The Patriarchs

    2. Moses and Aaron

    3. Joshua and Priests

    5. Judges

    6. Kings, Prophets, Priests

    7. Christ and Disciples

    D. Dispensation of the Church (John 1317; Acts 2-Revelation 3)

    1. Apostolic Period

    2. Post Apostolic Period

    E. Dispensation of Tribulation Saints (Revelation 419)

    1. 144,000 Jews

    2. The two witnesses

    3. Believing Gentiles

  • 8/11/2019 v4n3_heid

    13/14

    F. Christ and His Kingdom (Revelation 20 and numerous Old Testament

    references).

    1. Christ

    CTSJ4:3 (July 1998) p. 42

    2. Old Testament saints

    3. Church saints

    4. Tribulation saints

    In the final Dispensation, the stewardships granted are rewards for faithfulness

    to a previous stewardship.

    Why This Approach Is Preferable

    Why identify the Dispensations this way? First, in each Dispensation God

    gives a distinct stewardship to His people. Each Dispensation includes blessings,responsibilities, accountability, rewards, and chastisement. Thus, Dispensations

    involve the governing relationship that God has with His own people, rather than

    with mankind in general, as Traditional Dispensationalism teaches.

    Within a given Dispensation there are additional responsibilities and blessingsadded, but there is always a retention of some of what went before. However,

    when moving from one Dispensation to another, there is the abrogation of the

    former stewardship and the establishment of a new one.

    For example, there is progression in the Dispensation of Israel from thePatriarchs, to Moses and Joshua, to the Judges, to the Kings and Prophets, and

    finally to Christ. Yet, when the Dispensation of the Church begins, there is an

    entirely new stewardship, and the former is abrogated. In the Dispensation of the

    Church, we are all priests; we all have a spiritual gift; we all have the indwellingHoly Spirit; etc. Moreover, we are no longer under the formal system known as

    the Mosaic Law as our rule of life.

    Since all Scripture is profitable per 2 Timothy 3:16, we not only can, butshould learn lessons from what is recorded concerning previous Dispensations.

    These lessons will better equip us to execute our own stewardship more faithfully.If I happen to move from Tulsa to Dallas, at some point I must leave Oklahomaand enter Texas. Once I enter Texas, I am under the laws of Texas. However, that

    does not mean I will ignore the lessons, both good and bad, learned while living

    under the laws of Oklahoma.

  • 8/11/2019 v4n3_heid

    14/14

    Space does not permit going into more detail on this important subject. My

    intent was to present Dispensationalism in a different light, placing the emphasison Gods dealings with His own people during different periods of history.