اثر مرونة سلسلة التجهيز على الاداء

3102/ The Journal of Administration & Economics/

)111(

* ..

) (

( )

. (85) ( 83)

(2323)

( 2331) (2325) (.2332)

.

.

/ / *

Abstract The research aims to determine the impact of

the flexibility of the supply chain of represented

(delivery flexiblity, supply flexiblity, information

systems flexiblity, and new product flexiblity) on the

strategic performance on according to the Balanced

Scorecard and was deported to (financial perspective,

customer perspective, internal business processes

perspective, innovation and learning perspective), and by

providing a model demonstrates the nature of the

relationship between the flexibility of the supply chain

and its impact on strategic performance.

The model of research was tested in a sample

selected from companies belonging to the Ministry of

. / * 7/0/3103


)111(

Industry, The research population consists of all

corporate executives and their representatives, in

addition to some of the managers of laboratories, or

factories, and technicians, and numbered )5( directors

and technicians.

The questionnaire was distributed to all members

of socity, and it has been returned from them (52) forms,

which are useful to make a valid statistical analysis,

The finding of the research indicated that the level of

the supply chain flexibility is acceptable in these

mentioned companies, the total average was (3.34), where

the new product got the highest level, and it was (3.38),

the level of the reached strategic performance was

(3.40), which is a good level, , the highest level of

strategic performance was in the customer perspective,

with a value of (3.43).

The other findings of the research indicated the

presence of positive significant correlation with a

significance relation between supply chain flexibility

and strategic performance, in addition to the

confirmation of search on the ability of companies,

under discussion, to achieve the strategic performance

through the increased interest, and the support of supply

chain flexibility dimensions employed in this research.

The research conclud to make some recommendations,

including the emphasis on attention to supply chain

flexibility dimensions adopted, in addition to other

dimensions that can provide support for strategic

performance, in addition to the need for follow-up the

managements of companies to promote strategic performance

dimensions, through the adoption of the most influential

dimensions of supply chain flexibile, because the high

uncertainty and constant change nature of the business

environment.

:

)

( )

(

.


)111(

.

.

:

.

: ) -0

) ( (.

. -3

: : -0

. . -3 . -2 ) -3

) ( (.

. -8

: : -0

. -3

. . -2

:

: :

) " (

( ) :

". " -0 ". " -3


)111(

" -2 ".

". " -3 "

: ." " -0

". " -3

". " -2

". " -3

".

:

(0)

: : . -0 . -3 . Spearman -2 ( Simple Liner Regression) -3

. . - -8 . SPSS

:


)115(

)

( )

( 58) ( ( .%90) ( 83)

:

) ( 0) (0 3 2 3 8

:

X1

X11 .

X12 .

X13 .

X14 .

X15 .

X2

X21 .

X22 .

X23 .

X24 .

X25 .

X3

X31 .

X32 .

X33 .

X34 .

X35 .

X4

X41 .

X42 .

X43 .

X44 .

X45 .

Y1

Y11 .

Y12 .

Y13 .

Y14

Y15 .

Y2

Y21

Y22 .

Y23

Y24 .

Y25

Y31


)111(

Y3

Y32

Y33 .

Y34

Y35 .

Y4

Y41

Y42

Y43 .

Y44 .

Y45

: ( Instrument Validity) : -0

( )

. : -3

%( 37) %( 37)

(t) (.009 0995 )

( t) ( 3) :( 3) ( 0.05)

(3) ( t)

( t-test)

7387 0

03332 3

03323 2

00333 3

03333 8

00338 7

03333 7

03331 5

33173= 33 ( 0.05)

( t) ( 3)

.

( Instrument Reliability) -2 (Alpha Cronbach)

( 2) (0.05) ( 0.83) .


)111(

(2)

1379 8 -0

1373 8 -3

1378 8 -2

1372 8 -3

1375 8 -8

1379 8 -7

1377 8 -7

1372 8 -5

1351 31

( 1371) (.038: 3115 )

: : " : -0

( ) (" )

:

" : - ".

" : - ".

" : - ".

." " : -

,.Fantazy et al., 2009);(Duclos et al) ;(3101 ) 2003)

" : -3

" :

" : - ".

" : - ".

: - .

: - .


)111(

;(Alhyari,2013) ;(3119 ) ;(3115 ) ;(3117 )

(Kaplan & Norton,1996)

.

: ( 0

(3101 ) -0

.

.

(Fantazy et al., 2009) -3

.

.

. -0 -3

.

(Duclos et al., 2003) -2

.

-0 . ) -3

(.

(3

(3115 ) -3


)111(

. -0 -3

.

(3119 -8

-0 .

-3 .

-0 .

-3 .

(Alhyari,2013) -7

: -0

" ( Soon&Udin,2011)

"

(Soon&Udin,2011:506) (Stevensonm2005 ) " Slack) (Stevenson,2005:23)

et al., 2010 ) " (Slack et al., 2010:670)

( Fantazy et al.,2009) "

Fantazy et) ( ) ( ) al.,2009:177.)

( Kumar et al.,2006)

( )


)111(

"

. (Kumar et al.,2006:305) "

-3 Vickery) ( Kumar et al.,2006)

et al.,1999) ) (

(Vokurka et al.,2003 ) ) (

(Kumar et al.,2006:310) :

" : - ,.Kumar, et al) "

" ( Duclos, et al., 2003) (2006:311 )

" ( Oke,2005) (Duclos,et al., 2003:451) ( (Oke,2005:975" )

( ) Kara and) (Soon &Udin, 2011:509)

Kayis,2004 )

(Kara and Kayis,2004:972)

.

" ( Tachizawa & Thomson,2007) : - "

" (Tachizawa & Thomson,2007:1117" )

" ( Duclos, et al., 2003:452) "

.(Duclos, et al., 2003:452) : -

(Duclos, et al., 2003:452)

)

(.310105 Vickery et) : -

al.,1999 ) " " (Duclos, et al., 2003:450) "

( 3100 ) (29 3117 )

( Sethi&Sethi,1990) (20 3100 )


)111(

" "

(.Sethi&Sethi,1990:311)

: -0

( 3100 )

( 3117) (98 3100)

(.59 3117 . )

(Kaplan and Norton:1992)

" "

(Rasila et al.,2010:280) -3

)

( 3) ( (Alhyari et al., 2013,517) :

(Alhyari et al., 2013,518)

-

-

. -

. -

. -

-

. -

. -

-

-


)111(

: -

3115 ) ( Daft,2010) (037

) (.Daft,2010,121( )

: -

( Daft,2010) (Alhyari et al., 2013:518) )

(.Daft,2010:121) : -

(Daft,2010,121)

(Alhyari et al., 2013:518)

(.037 3115 )

: -3 ( Alhyari et al., 2013) (Daft,2010,121)

(.Alhyari et al., 2013:518)

:

:

: -0 ( 3)

(2323) : (0.54)

- ( 3.36) ( 3)

(0.56) (3) ( 5,4,3,2,1)

) (3.13) (3) (

( 3.62) ( 2) (0.35)


)111(

( ) ( 3.33-3.46) (0.60)

.(0.50-0.68)

(3)

X1

X11 3.33 0.68

X12 3.62 0.60

X13 3.13 0.35

X14 3.41 0.48

X15 3.46 0.50

3.36 0.56

X2

X21 3.11 0.53

X22 3.35 0.46

X23 3.24 0.45

X24 3.31 0.44

X25 3.65 0.50

3.33 0.49

X3

X31 3.58 0.63

X32 3.27 0.75

X33 3.26 0.55

X34 3.24 0.44

X35 3.11 0.51

3.29 0.58

X4

X41 3.32 0.55

X42 3.37 0.52

X43 3.14 0.49

X44 3.64 0.72

X45 3.41 0.60

3.38 0.58

3.34 0.54

- ( 3.33)

( 0.49) ( 10,9,8,7,6)

(0.50) (3.65) ( 10) ( 6) ( )

) (0.53) ( 3.11) ( 9,8,7) (

.(0.44,0.45,0.46) ( 3.31,3.24,3.53)

- ( 3.29) ( 3)

(0.58) ( 3.58) ( 11) (15,14,13,12,11)

) ( 0.63) ( 15) (

( 3.11) ( ) (14,13,12) (0.51)

(. 0.44,0.55,0.75) ( 3.24,3.26,3.27)


)111(

- ( 3) ( 3.38)

( 19) ( 20,19,18,17,6) (0.58) ( )

( 18) (0.72) ( 3.64) ) ( 0.49) ( 3.14)

( 3.41,3.37,3.32) ( 20,17,16) ( ( 0.60,0.52,0.55)

-3 ( 8) ( 3) ( 3.40)

( 0.61) :

- ( 3.40) ( 8)

(0.63) (y15,y14,y13,y12,y11) (y11 ) ( 3.73)

( y15) ( 0.72) ( 0.46) ( 3.14)

. (8)

Y1

Y11 3.73 0.72

Y12 3.35 0.65

Y13 3.41 0.63

Y14 3.38 0.63

Y15 3.14 0.46

3.40 0.63

Y21 3.43 0.54

Y22 3.23 0.55

Y23 3.43 0.54

Y24 3.41 0.54

Y25 3.64 0.66

3.43 0.57

Y31 3.36 0.77

Y32 3.39 0.65

Y33 3.12 0.42

Y34 3.69 0.57

Y35 3.31 0.77

3.37 0.65

Y41 3.42 0.79

Y42 3.38 0.59

Y43 3.11 0.64

Y44 3.41 0.57

Y45 3.72 0.62

3.41 0.66

3.40 0.61

-


)115(

( 3.43) (y25,y24,y23,y22,y21) (0.57)(y25 ) ( 0.66) ( 3.64)

( y22) ( 3.23)

( 0.55) .

- ( 3.37) ( 8)

( 0.65) (y34) ( y35,y34,y33,y32,y31)

( 0.57) ( 3.69) ( y33)

( 0.42) ( 3.12) .

- ( 3.41)

( y45,y44,y43,y42,y41) (0.66) ( 3.72) ( y45)

( y43) ( 0.62)( 0.64) ( 3.11)

.

: -

:( Cohen and Cohen,1983)

0.10 : -0 0.10 - 0.30 : -3 0.30 : -2

(7)

r Sig. r Sig. r Sig. r Sig. r Sig.

0.60** 0.00 0.41** 0.002 0.35** 0.004 0.35** o.oo5 0.51** 0.000 5 100%

0.41** 0.002 0.40** 0.001 0.40** 0.002 0.28* 0.04 0.42** 0.003 5 100%

0.43** 0.002 0.54** 0.001 0.35** 0.44 0.40** 0.002 0.39** 0.02 5 100%

0.40** 0.004 0.26* 0.04 0.45** 0.004 0.61** 0.000 o.50** 0.001 5 100%

0.52** 0.001 0.44** 0.002 0.48** 0.001 0.44** 0.002 0.60** 0.000 5 100%

(0.05) * (0.01) **

( 7) :


)111(

( 8) -0 ) ( %100)

( 0.35,0.35,0.41) ( ( ) (P0.01)

(P0.01) (0.60) (.P0.01) ( 0.51) ( )

(%100) -3 ( %100)

(0.40,0.40,0.41) ( ) (1335)

P0.05,P0.01).) ( 8) -2

) ( %100) (

(P0.01) ( 0.40,0.35,0.43) (P0.01) ( 0.54)

( 0.44) (P0.01 .)

( 8) -3 ) ( %100)

( 0.40 ,0.45) ( (P0.01) (1337)

( 0.61) ( ) (P0.01) (. P0.01) ( 0.50)

-8 ) ( %100)

( (P0.01) ( 0.44,0.48,0.44)

(P0.01) ( 0.52) ( 0.60)

(P0.01 .) : -

:

: (0 (0.34) (7)

( ( )0.60) ( 0.34) ( F)

(0.05) ( P.value (0.00 (29.61) P.value

" ."

(7)

Sig.

P.value

0.05


)111(

0.000 29.61 0.36 0.60 1.273

0.002 11.67 0.17 0.43 1.861

0.001 12.49 0.18 0.42 1.855

0.002 10.42 0.16 0.45 1.734

0.000 21.13 0.27 0.93 0.168

(7) (0.17) ( 0.17)

( ( )0.43) (11.67) ( F)

P.value (0.05) ( P.value (0.002

". " (0.18) (7) ( ( )0.42) ( 0.18)

( P.value (0.001 (12.49) ( F)

P.value (0.05) "

". (0.16) (7)

( ( )0.45) ( 0.16)

P.value (10.42) ( F) P.value (0.05) ( 0.002)

". "

( 7) ( 0.27) (0.27)(( )0.93 )

(21.13) ( F) ((P.value (0.05) ( P.value (0.000

". "

(3 (0.17) (5)

( ( )0.20) ( 0.17) ( F)

( P.value (0.001 (7.88) ( (P.value (0.05)

" ".

(5)


)111(

Sig.

P.value

0.05

0.001 7.88 0.17 0.190 1.210

0.003 9.87 0.16 0.44 1.721

0.0002 20.24 0.29 0.960 0.133

0.047 4.11 0.07 0.27 2.420

0.001 10.28 0.19 0.43 1.238

( 5) (0.16) ( 0.16)

( ( )0.44) ( F)

(0.05) ( P.value (0.003 (9.87) (P.value)

" ". ( 0.29) ( 5)

( ( )0.93) ( 0.29)

( P.value (0.002 (20.42) ( F) (P.value) (0.05)

" ".

(0.07) ( 5) ( ( )0.27) ( 0.07)

P.value (4.11) ( F)

P.value (0.05) ( 0.047)

". " ( 5)

( 0.19) (0.19)(( )0.46 )

(10.28) ( F) ((P.value (0.05) ( P.value) (0.025)

". "

(2 (0.12) ( 9)

( ( )0.46) ( 0.12)

( P.value)) (0.007 (7.79) ( F) (P.value) (0.05)

" ".

(9)

Sig.


)111(

P.value 0.05

0.007 7.79 0.12 0.46 1.755

0.002 8.50 0.16 0.233 2.425

0.03 6.02 0.12 0.424 1.508

0.000 14.50 0.21 0.49 1.670

0.000 17.13 0.23 0.83 0.588

(9) ( 0.16) ( 0.16) ( ( )0.23)

(8.50) ( F) (P.value) (0.05) ( P.value (0.002

". "

( 0.12) (9) ( ) ( 0.12)

( 0.44) (6.02) ( F)

(P.value) (0.036 ) (0.05) P.value))

" ".

(0.21) ( 9) ( ) ( 0.21)

( 0.49) (14.50) ( F) (P.value) (0.05) ( P.value (0.00

"

". ( 9) ( 0.23) (0.23)

( ( )0.83) ( F)

((P.value (0.05) ( P.value (0.00 (17.13)

" ".

- ( 0.12) ( 01)

( ( )0.44) ( 0.12)

( P.value) (0.001) (6.16) ( F) ((P.value (0.05)

" ".

(01)

Sig.


)111(

P.value 0.05

0.001 6.16 0.12 0.441 1.055

0.002 4.23 0.08 0.362 2.077

0.001 5.10 0.16 0.514 1.569

0.000 17.77 0.37 0.791 0.716

0.001 13.84 0.19 0.421 1.194

( 0.08) ( 01) ( ( )0.36) ( 0.08)

( P.value)) (0.002 (4.03) ( F)

((P.value (0.05) "

". (0.16) ( 01)

( ( )0.51) ( 0.16)

(5.09) ( F) ((P.value (0.001 ) (0.05) P.value))

"

". ( 0.23) ( 01)

( ) ( 0.23) ( 0.79) (17.77) ( F)

(P.value) (0.05) ( P.value)) (0.00

" ".

( 01) ( 0.19) ( 0.19) ( ( )0.42)

( F) (0.05) ( P.value) (0.001) (13.13)

(P.value) "

".

: - ) -0

( .

: -3 . (0 (3


)111(

.

(2 .

(3 .

(8 ( ) ( )

.

- :

-0 ( 0.60)

. -3

.

-2 .

-3

. . -8 -7

.

) -7 (

.

: -0

. -3

. -2

. -3

( ) . ( ) -8

.

-7 .

:


)111(

- . 3100 -0 : 3115 -3

. : - 3100 -2

.39-7 0 05 :

: - 3100 -3

. : 3117 -8

- .

: 3119 -7

. 3115 -7

: .

: -

5-Cohen, J., & Cohen, P.,(1983), Applied Multiple Regression / Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Ed, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 9 -Daft, R. L., (2010), Understanding the Theory and Design of Organizations, 10th ed.,south western, Cengage Learning.

01-Kaplan, R. &Norton, D., (1996) , The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance, Brinter Barry Warren, Graham and Lamont, Boston.

00-Stevenson, W.J. (2005), "Operations Management", 8th ed., McGraw-Hill, Irwin, USA.

03-Slack, N., Chambers, S. and Johnston, R. (2010),"Operations Managemet", 6thed., Pearson, Prentice Hall, New York.

-02-Alhyari, S., Alazab, M., Venkatraman , S., Alazab, M. and Alazab, A.,

2013, "Performanceevaluation of e-government services using balanced scorecard: Anempiricalstudy in Jordan", Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 512-536.

03- Duclos, L. K., Vokurka, R. J. and Lummus, R. R., 2003, "A conceptual model of supply chain flexibility", Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 103, No. 6, pp. 446-456.

08-Fantazy, K., Kumar, V. and Kumar, U. (2009), "An Empirical Study of the RelationshipsAmong Strategy, Flexibility, and Performance in the Supply Chain Context",Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 14 No. 3 pp. 177-188.


)111(

07-Kara, S. and Kayis, B. (2004), "Manufacturing Flexibility and Variability: an overview",Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management , Vol. 15 No. 6, pp. 466-478.

07- Kumar, V., Fantazy, K.A. and Kumar, U., 2006, "Implementation and management framework for supply chain flexibility", Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 303-319.

05-Oke, A. (2005), "A framework for analysing manufacturing flexibility", International Journal of Operations &Production Management, Vol. 25 No. 10, pp. 973-996.

09-Rasila, H., Alho, J. and Nenonen, S. (2010), "Using balanced scorecard in operationalising FM strategies", Journal of Corporate Real Estate, Vol.12 No. 4, pp: 279-288.

31-Sethi, A.K. and Sethi, P.S., (1990), "Flexibility in Manufacturing:asurvey",International Journal of Flexibility Manufacturing Systems,Vol.2 No. 4,pp.289-328.

30- Soon, Q.H. and Udin, Z.M. (2011), "Supply chain management from the perspective of value chain flexibility: an exploratory study", Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 506-526.

33-Tachizawa, E.M. and Thomson, C.G., 2007, "Drivers and sources of supply flexibility: an exploratory study", International Journal of Operations &ProductionManagement, Vol. 27, No. 10, pp. 1115-1136.

(0)

/ . 0

/ / . 3

. 2

/

.. 3 /

/ .. 8

/ . 7

/ . 7

اثر مرونة سلسلة التجهيز على الاداء

Documents