columnplan2r
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
1/35
COLUMNS
Column :
A column is a vertical member in a structure used to transfer the loads from slabs to the
foundation below. Columns are the primary components in a multi-storeyed building. The
design of the column plays a vital role in structural design, as any lapse leads to total
collapse, unlike other structural components. So the Design Engineer should be well versedwith the computation of forces acting on the column & the proper visualisation on the
behaviour of the columns under such forces.
Column Classification:
Le Pedestal Stub Short Long
Le (Minimum) 0 2.5 b 4 b >12 b
Le (Maximum) 2.5 b 4 b 12 b 60 b
If the slenderness ratio (Le /D ) is less than 3, those vertical members are calledPedestals. If the slenderness ratio is greater than 3 , those vertical members are calledColumns.
1.0 Classification of Columns:A column may be classified based on different criteria such as(a) shape of cross- section(b) slenderness ratio(c) type of loading(d) pattern of lateral reinforcement
(a) Shape of cross-section :
The common shapes of columns in practice are(1) Square columns(2) Rectangular columns(3) Circular columns(4) L-shaped columns(5) T-shaped columns(6) Cruciform (Swastik)(7) Hexagonal columns.
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
2/35
..2..
(b) Based on slenderness ratio:If the slenderness ratio (effective length of column to least lateral dimension ) is less than
12, it is called as short columns. (Clause 25.1.2 of IS: 456-2000)
If the slenderness ratio (effective length of column to least lateral dimension ) is greater
than 12, it is called as long columns or slender columns. However, the maximumslenderness ratio of a column should not exceed 60.
(c) Type of Loading :
Column can be classified as(1) Axial loaded columns(2) Axial load with uniaxial moment(3) Axial load with bi -axial moment
(d) Based on Types of lateral reinforcementColumn can be classified as
(1) Tied column(2) Spiral column(3) Composite column
(1) Tied Columns : The main longitudinal bars are enclosed within closely spaced lateralties.
(2) Columns with helical reinforcement: The main longitudinal reinforcement bars areenclosed within closely spaced and continuously wound spiral reinforcement.
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
3/35
..3..
(3) Composite Columns: The main longitudinal reinforcement of the composite columnsconsists of structural steel sections or pipes with or without longitudinal bars.
Braced & Unbraced columns :
(i) Braced Columns:
Columns can be planned in a structure so that they do not have to resist any horizontal
loads due to wind or earthquake. Thus, for example, when the columns of water-tower are
braced, the wind load is taken by the intersection of column bracings. In tall buildings lateral
supports like shear walls can be provided so that the lateral loads are taken by them. Such
columns are called braced columns.
(ii) Unbraced Columns :Other columns, where the lateral loads have to be resisted in addition to vertical loads by
the strength of the columns themselves, are considered as unbraced columns.Bracing
can be in one direction or in more than one direction, depending on the likelihood of the
direction of the lateral loads.
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
4/35
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
5/35
..5..
If the column is subjected to large bending moment M as compared to axial load P (saye = M > 0.5 ) assume bars to be equally placed on opposite face likeD PDdoubly reinforced section.
If P is large compared to bending moment M (say e = M < 0.5 ) assume.D PD
bars to be uniformly placed all around the periphery.
4.0 IS CODE RECOMMNDATIONS FOR DESIGN OF COLUMNS
1).Unsupported length of column: (Clause 25.1.3 of IS 456-2000)The unsupported length L of a compression member is defined as clear distance between
the end restraints. In the case of column in a framed structure, unsupported length is taken
as follows for the different structures.
(a) Beam-slab floor construction:It is the clear distance between the floor and the framing into the columns in each
direction at the next higher floor level.
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
6/35
..6..
(a) Flat Slab construction:It is the clear distance between the floor and lower extremity of the capital, the drop
panel, or slab whichever is the least.
(c) In columns restrained laterally by struts(as in case of a staging for overhead tanks), it
is the clear distance between the consecutive struts in each vertical plane, provided
two such struts shall meet the columns at approximately the same level and the
internal angle between vertical planes through the struts does not exceed 135 .Such
struts are expected to have sufficient rigidity to restrain the column against lateral
deflection.
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
7/35
..7..
(d)` In columns restrained laterally by struts or beams with brackets used at the junction, it
is taken equal the clear distance between the floor and the lower edge of the bracket
provided that the bracket width equals that of the beam strut and at least half that of
the column.
2) Effective length: (clause 25.2 of IS 456 -2000)
The effective length of a column is a length between points of zero bending moment or
between the points of contra flexure of a column in that plane. It depends upon the end
conditions as regards restraint against rotation and that against transverse displacement.
Effective Length of Compression Members (Table 28 of IS 456 2000)
Degree of End Restraint of Compressive Member TheoreticalValue ofEffectiveLength
Recommended value ofEffective Length
Effectively held in position and restrained againstrotation at both ends (Both ends fixed) 0.5L 0.65LEffectively held in position at both ends, restrainedagainst rotation at one end (One end fixed & oneend hinged )
0.7L 0.80L
Effectively held in position at both ends, but norestrained rotation (Both ends hinged) 1.00L 1.00LEffectively held in position and restrained againstrotation at one end, and at the other restrainedagainst rotation but not held in position 1.00L 1.20L
Effectively held in position and restrained againstrotation at one end, and at the other partially
restrained against rotation but not held in position --- 1.50LEffectively held in position at one end but notrestrained against rotation, and at the other endrestrained against rotation but not held in position 2.00L 2.00L
Effectively held in position and restrainedagainst rotation at one end but not held in positionnor restrained against rotation at the other end(One end fixed one end free) 2.00L 2.00L
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
8/35
..8..
Typical idealized Effective length of Column
Sl.No. Boundary Conditions Effective length1 Simply supported at both the ends L
2 Fixed at both the ends 0.65L3 Fixed at one end and hinged at the other 0.80L4 Fixed at one end and constrained against rotation at the
other end1.20L
5 Fixed at one end and free at the other end 2.0L6 Columns in Portal frames with fixed bases & having lateral
sway1.50L
Sl.No. Boundary Conditions Effective length
7 Columns in Portal frames with hinged bases & having lateralsway
2.0L
8 Interior Columns in Multi storey frames above G.L. 0.80L9 Exterior Columns in Multi storey frames above G.L. 1.20L10 Crane carrying Columns in braced buildings L
Determination of effective length of Column and Type of Column:
When there are longitudinal and cross walls in both directions, the frame is assumed to bea non- sway frame. In such cases, the effective length lies between 0.65L to L, where Lrepresents buildings frame may be taken as follows:
(ii) For any intermediate storeyLeff=L= unsupported Length
= floor to floor height depth of shallower beam(300mm or more dependingon the span)(iii) For Top storey
Leff= 1.20L where L is unsupported Length as defined above.
(iv) For Columns in bottom storeyWhen plinth beams are not providedLeff=L= Distance between bottom of footing to the underside of the shallower
beam at first floor level.When plinth beams are providedLeff=L= Distance between top of plinth beam to the underside of the shallower
beam at first floor level.It may be noted that plinth beams are normally provided just below ground level and not at
the ground floor level, so that peripheral walls can retain the plinth filling.
If there are no walls first floor as in case of apartment buildings in cities where parking space
is provided underneath the entire structure above rests on the columns. In this case, there is
a possibility for way to occur and hence the effective lengths of the columns below are taken
equal to 1.2L to 2L depending on the end conditions. Here L is length of column from the
soffit of shallower beam of first storey to the bottom of footing.
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
9/35
..9..
3) Slenderness Limits:
The Column dimensions should be selected in such a way that it fails by material failureonly and not by buckling. To ensure this criterion, the code recommends that the cleardistance between restraints (unsupported length) should never exceed 60 times the leastlateral dimensions of the column ( Clause 25.3.1 of I.S 456- 2000 ).
(The unsupported length of a column shall not exceed 60 times its least lateral dimensionwhen both of its ends are either fixed or hinged)
For unbraced columns, it is recommended that this value is limited to 30. In cantilever inaddition to the above restriction ( L 60 b), the value of L = (100 b2 / D ), where D is depthof cross section measured in the Plane under consideration and b is the width of crosssection (Clause 25.3.2 of I.S 456 -2000).
(The unsupported length of a column shall not exceed (100 b2 / D) when one of its end freei.e. unrestrained.)
4) Minimum Eccentricity : ( Clause 25.4 of I.S 456 -2000)
Every column to be designed for a minimum eccentricity emini. ( in any plane) equal to the
unsupported length / 500 plus lateral dimension / 30, subject to a minimum of 20 mm. For a
column with a rectangular section, for bending about major axis x x bisecting the depth of
column D
exmini. = l / 500 + D / 3020 mm ( whichever is greater )
Mini. Eccentricity, eminib for bending about major axis y- y bisecting the width of the column
eymini. = l / 500 + b / 3020 mm ( whichever is greater )
For non-rectangular & non-circular cross-sectional shapes, it is recommendedthat, for any given planeemini = le / 300
20 mm (whichever is greater ) where le = effective length of column in the planeconsidered.Note: When mini. Eccentricity requirement control, the bending only about one axis at atime shall be considered and NOT as a case of biaxial bending.
For a given lateral dimension h, the mini. Unsupported length up to which emini. =20mm can be obtained as follows:L/500 + h/30 = 20mm
L = 500 (20- h / 30)Max. unsupported length up to which emini. = 20 mm is given as follows
h inmm
150 200 230 250 300 350 380 400 450
L inmetre
7.50 6.67 6.17 5.83 5.00 4.17 3.67 3.33 2.50
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
10/35
..10..
5) Longitudinal Reinforcement: (Clause 26.5.3.1 of I.S 456 -2000)
(i) Minimum Reinforcement: The Longitudinal bars must, in general, have a cross
sectional area not less than 0.8 % of the gross area of the column section.
In very large sized columns (where the large size is dictated, for instance, by architectural
considerations, and not strength) under axial compression, the limit of 0.8% of gross area
may result in excessive reinforcement. In such cases, the Code allows some concession by
permitting the minimum area of steel to be calculated as 0.8 % of area of concrete
required to resist the direct stress, not the actual (gross) area.
(ii) Maximum Reinforcement: The max. cross-sectional area of longitudinal bars should
not exceed 6 % of gross area of column section. However, a reduced maximum limit of 4 %
is recommended in general in the interest of better placement and compaction of concrete
and, in particular, is lapped splice location.
(iii) Minimum Diameter: Longitudinal bars in columns should not be less than 12 mm in
diameter and should not be spaced more than 300 mm apart (centre - to centre ) along
the periphery of the column.
(iv) Maximum Diameter: 40 mm for Fe 415 & Fe 500.
(v) Common Diameter of bars used: 12,16,20,22,25,28
(vi) Minimum number of bars: 4 in rectangular columns ; 6 in circular columns & one bar
located at each corner or apex in T, L or other cross-sectional shapes.
(vii) Common Numbers used: 4,6,8,10,12
(viii) Maximum spacing of bars: 300 mm when measured along periphery of column.
(ix) Cover to Reinforcement : A minimum clear cover of 40 mm or bar diameter
(whichever is greater), to the column ties is recommended by the code (Clause 26.4.2.1 of
I.S 456 -2000) for columns in general; a reduced clear cover of 25 mm is permitted in small-
sized columns (D 200 mm and whose reinforcing bars do not exceed 12 mm) .
Transeverse Reinforcement : ( Clause 26.5.3.2 of I.S 456- 2000)
(i) General : All longitudinal reinforcement in a compression member must be enclosedwithin transverse reinforcement, comprising either lateral ties( with internal angles notexceeding 135) or spirals.
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
11/35
..11..
(ii) Lateral ties :
(a) Diameter of bars : max., or 6 mm whichever is higher.(b) Pitch : Least of the following(i) Least lateral dimension of column b(ii) 16 times diameter of smallest longitudinal bar i.e. 16 mini(iii) 300 mm
Helical reinforcement :
Pitch : mini. of 75 mm (core dia / 6)Not less than 25 mm, 3 h
PLANNING ASPECTS
1. Columns should preferably be located at or near the corner of a building and at the
intersection of walls.
2. The spacing of columns shall be such that the span of the beam is not less than 2.5m
nor greater than 10.0m. Spans of 4 m to 6 m give normal sizes of beams.
Single bay Portal frames may be adopted for spans ranging from 6.0m to 12.0m.
The spacing of frame may vary from 3.50m to 4.0m.
3. The centre to centre distance between columns should be decided based on
limitations on spans of supporting beams.
4. Where architectural or functional requirements demand large open space, number of
columns have to be kept along the periphery giving large spans for the beams.
5. Columns should be avoided inside a big hall as it makes the functional utility and the
appearance and obstructs the clear view and the usable space.
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
12/35
..12..
6. Where providing a column footing on a boundary poses a difficulty, columns may be
taken inside so that the footing is inside the boundary line and floor beams be
cantilevered out beyond the columns to support beam carrying walls along the
boundary. Brackets may be taken out from the column in continuation of cross beams
to support walls along the boundary line. Alternatively, a combined footing or a strip
footing may be provided.
7. Select the position of columns so as to reduce bending moments in beams: Where
the locations of two columns are very near (eg) as it occurs when the corner of a
building and the point of intersection of walls come very close to each other, then one
column should be provided instead of two at such a positions so as to reduce the
beam moment. In buildings small offsets (such as PQ) are provided from architectural
considerations. Now the question arises whether to provide the column at P or Q.
Consider only the point loads(excluding load
transferred by floors) transferred by beams B1 and B2. If only column P is provided
beam B1 will transfer a concentrated load at Q. In such a case beam B3 will have
larger span and subjected to concentrated load at Q thereby there will be
considerably increase in bending moment. Instead of this if the column is located at
Q , the cantilever moment due to the reaction of B2 at P will relieve the B.M. in B3,
thus providing a cheaper alternative. Under certain rare circumstances to satisfy the
functional requirements, it may not be possible to provide upper storey columns
above the columns at the parking level. Then the column at parking level is required
to support the eccentric columns at upper storeys. In such a case the column S at
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
13/35
..13..
parking level is splayed as shown in Fig. or provided with a bracket to support the
columns at the upper storey. However, the column at parking level will be subjected
to heavy concentrated loads transferred from the columns of upper storey.
8. Avoid larger spans of beams: When the centre to centre distance between the
intersection of walls is large or where there are no cross walls, the spacing between
two columns decides the span of the beam. As the spans of supported beams,
because spacing of columns decides the span of the beam. As the span(and the
length) of the beam increases, the required depth of the beam, and hence its self
weight, and the total load on beam increases. Columns are in general, always
cheaper compared to beams on the basis of unit cost. Therefore, large spans of
beams should preferably be avoided for economy reasons.
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
14/35
..14..
In this case, either one column at C can be provided making ACB a two span continuous
beam or two columns can be provided at E and G to form AB a three span continuous beam.
In the first case, spans AC and CB will be larger and the beam has to carry two point loads,
one at E and the other at G, transferred from secondary beams. This will require heavier
section for the beam in the latter case, when two columns are provided one at E and another
at G, the beam becomes a three span beam. Length of beam is reduced and it is required to
carry only one concentrated load and that too on central span which further reduces the
moment in outer spans AE and GB without appreciable increase in design moment in
position EG leading to considerable reduction in the cost of beam.
On the other hand since the cost of column is nearly proportional to the load on it, increase in
cost of columns and footings due to provision of two columns at E and G (carrying half the
load), over the cost of providing single column at C will be comparatively less than the
increase in the cost of beam due to providing single column. Thus, the second alternative is
likely to work out to be cheaper. This is more true in the case of multistory building frames.
8. Projections of columns outside the wall should be avoided as far as possible.
9. The columns should be so oriented that the depth of column should be perpendicular
to the major axis of bending.
D b
b
X X y Y
D
XX - Major axis of bending
YY - Minor axis of bending
D - Perpendicular to axis of bending
b - Parallel to axis of bending
10. When the effective length of column in one plane is greater than that in the
orthogonal plane, the greater dimensions shall be in the plane, having larger
effective length so as to reduce leff /D ratio to increase the load carrying capacity of
the column.
..15..
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
15/35
PRACTICAL ASPECTS
1.Trial Section:Least lateral dimension (b) = width of beam .Normally 230 mm or
Lef /12 whichever is greater.
Area of cross-section of column (Ac)
80 to 100 mm2 per every 1 KN ultimate load carried by the column depending on the
grade of concrete used. Area required for concrete is roughly @10 N / mm2 for all
grades of concrete.
Trial section can be fixed initially using the following guide values.
Grade ofConcrete
M15 M20 M25
Externalcolumns
2500 2000 1500
Internal
columns
1800 1500 1200
D= large dimension of column = Ac /b
Steel strength for Fe 415Dia of rod in mm Ultimate capacity in KN / bar
12 3016 6020 9025 140
2. Recommended Size of columns :
Size of columns to be kept as follows:
For Square columns : multiples of 50 mm up to 500 mm
For Rectangular columns : multiples of 100 mm above 500 mm.
Circular columns are preferable for dia greater than 200 mm.
Practical Sizes of columns adopted in Practise :
Square Column Rectangular column
230 x 230 230 x 300 300x 500 500 x 600
300 x 300 230 x 380 300x 600 500 x 800400 x 400 230 x 450 400x450 600 x 700450 x 450 230 x 600 400x530 600 x 800500 x 500 300 x 400 400x 600600 x 600 300 x 450 450x600
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
16/35
..16..
Circular Column :
300 dia
400 dia
450 dia
500 dia600 dia
3. Approximate of load carrying capacity of column for a known section
(i) CONCRETE STRENGTH:
Concrete area incm2
Load carrying capacity of Concretein Tonnes
M15 M20 M25100 4 5 6
(i) STEEL GRADE Fe 415
Bar Dia.
Safe Load carrying capacity in Tonnes
As per Vazirani &Chandola
As per Chandra Handbook
12 2.15 2.03
16 3.82 3.62
20 5.97 5.6525 9.33 8.83
28 11.7 11.08
32 15.28 14.47
36 19.34 ---
40 23.85 ---
3. Longitudinal reinforcement :
(Clause 26.5.3.1 of IS 456-2000)Ast Dia of Bar No. of bars Spacing of bar
Minimum Maximum Mini. Max. Minimum Maximum0.8% ofc.s.areaof column
6%(Preferable4%)
12 mm 50 mm 4 300 mm
4. Other aspects :
1) Normally size of column should not be altered for at least four floors in multi-storied
buildings.
2) A section less than 200 x 200 mm is generally not preferred.
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
17/35
..17..
3) For columns, rich concrete mixes like M25 and M20 in the lower storey of multi-storey
building will lead to economy. Column sizes should be chosen on the higher side and
richer concrete mixes and age factors shall be used in the lower storey. For
durability, the minimum concrete mix in all concrete members shall be M 20.
4) For achieving economy in shuttering, column size can be kept the same throughout
the height of building ( or in steps of a few storey at the least ) varying the
reinforcement and the concrete mix as required in the design.
5) Slender columns should be avoided, if possible , as these consume more steel than
that required for the corresponding short columns.
6) In earthquake prone areas, square columns will prove more economical than
rectangular columns, as these columns will have to be designed for
earthquake effect in each principal direction .
5. Grouping of Columns:
There are number of columns in one building and size of all columns cannot be
different as formwork is uneconomical. Usually not varying by more than 10 to 20%
and which have their effective lengths equal may be grouped together and then the
columns are designed for the loads that they carry. The columns carrying maximum
load may only be designed in that group and the same section be adopted for all the
columns in that group. This saves the computational efforts and save labour during
the execution of work. This is of prime importance in practical design.
6. Estimation of Loads:
The design of column necessitates determination of loads transferred from beam at different
floor levels. Loads are transferred from slabs to beams and then to columns. Hence, slabs
and beams are normally designed prior to the design of columns. This method enables one
to assess the loads on columns more accurately and thereby and design of column becomes
realistic and economical.
However, in practice, many times situation arise which require the design of columns andfootings to be given to the clients prior to the design of slabs and beams. In such situations,
loads on columns and footings are required to the assessed using judgement based on past
experience or using approximate methods. The loads on the columns can be determined
approximately on the basic of floor area shared by each column. These loads are normally
calculated on the higher side so that they are not less than the actual loads transferred from
slabs / beams. In such cases, the design of column is likely to be uneconomical.
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
18/35
..18..
In case of load bearing structure (Masonry building ) the loads may be calculated as follows:
External wall =25 KN/ m / floor
Internal wall =35 KN/ m / floor
In general the load of 20 KN/ m / floor may be taken for calculation of loads on columns.
Framed structure:
S.No. Column Type Residential building Office building1 Corner column 22 KN/ m2 24 KN/ m2
2 End row middlecolumn(Side column)
17 KN/ m2 19 KN/ m2
3 Interior Column 12 KN/ m2 14 KN/ m2
Add 2 KN / m2 for stair case and Toilet area
As per U.H.Varyani:
S.No. Column location Load intensity over Tributary Floor Area at all supporting levels
1 Corner Column 25 KN/ m2
2 Exterior Column (Side Column) 20 KN/ m2
3 Interior Column 15 KN/ m2
When Column loads are calculated on the basis of the tributary area method, 5% extra
increase in column loads is incorporated to account for unforeseen items and also for elasticbeam shear effects.
When Column loads are calculated by the method of beam reactions, 15% reduction in
Column loads should be made to get realistic loads. This is due to the fact that slab loads in
beams are calculated by the formula wlx / 3 or wlx /6 {3- (lx / ly)2 } which otherwise, lead to
excessive column loads.
In both the methods, live load reduction in multi storeyed buildings should be made as per
relevant code and the column loads, as per modified above, shall be used for column and
footing design and also for earthquake analysis.
Reduction on Floor live loads:In assessment of loads on columns, the reduction in total live loads on floor may be made asspecified under.
..19..
Number of floors carried by the column under % of reduction of total live load on all
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
19/35
consideration floors above the column under consideration
1 0
2 103 20
4 305 to 10 40
10 or more 50
No reduction shall be made in the case of columns in warehouses, garages and other
buildings used for storage purpose and factories and workshops designed for a live load of
5000 N/m2. However for buildings such as factories and workshops designed for a live load
of more than 5000N/ m2 the reduction shown above may be made provided that the loading
assumed for any column, is not less than, it would have if all floors had been designed for a
live load of 5000 N /m2 with no reduction.
Column loads can be cross checked by using 3-D computer (or space frame analysis )
under VL = (DL + LL)
Computation of Floor load on Column :
(A) Exact Method :
This method is used when the beam end shears are known prior to column design.
The load on column at each floor level is given by
Pufloor = V1 +V2 +V3 + V4 +Pa + Pselfwhere V1,V2,V3,V4 are the end shears of
beams meeting at the floor under consideration from all the four directions 1,2,3,4.
Pa = axial load coming from above
Pself=self weight of the column at the floor under consideration.
(B) Approximate Method:
This method may be used when the column design is required to be done prior to
design of slabs and beams. The loads are calculated based on Tributary area
method.
..20..
P = wAN whereP = Total axial loadW= total loading intensity in KN/m2
A = Tributary area in m2
N= No. of storeys.When column loads are calculated on the basis of this method, 5% extra increase
in column loads is incorporated to account for unforeseen items and also for elastic
beam shear effects.
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
20/35
When column loads are calculated by the method of beam reactions, 15%reduction in column loads should be made to get realistic loads. This is due to the
fact that slab loads in beams are calculated by the formula wlx or3
wlx { 3- (lx)2 } which otherwise lead to excessive column loads.ly
In both these methods, live load reduction in multistoreyed buildings should be made as per
the relevant code and the column loads as modified above, shall be used for column and
footing design and also for earthquake analysis. Column loads can be cross checked by
using 3-D computer( or space frame) under VL = (DL+LL).
Moments in Columns:
Normally moment on column will be obtained by frame analysis using any standard method.
In case of design for corner column for biaxial bending, moment has to be calculated on
both direction of column. For this the moment on one direction ( major
axis) will be obtained by frame analysis. The moment on other direction (minor axis) will beusually be obtained by approximate method using Table given in IS 456 1964 as givenbelow:
Moments in Columns
Condition Moments for frames of one bay
Moments for frames of two ormore bays
External (and similarlyloaded) columns:
Moment at foot of uppercolumn
Me Ku{ --------------- }Kl + Ku +0.5 Kb
Me Ku{ --------------- }
Kl + Ku + KbMoment at head of lowercolumn
Me Kl{ --------------- }Kl + Ku +0.5 Kb
Me Kl{ --------------- }
Kl + Ku +Kb
Internal Columns:
Moment at foot of uppercolumn
--- Mes Ku{ ---------------------}
Kl + Ku + Kb1+ Kb2
Moment at head of lowercolumn
--- Mes Kl{ ---------------------}
Kl + Ku + Kb1+ Kb2
..21..
Note:1. Notations used in the above table are as follows:
Me = bending moment at the end of the beam framing into the column
assuming fixity at the connection.
Mes = Maximum difference between the moments at the end of two beams
framing into opposite sides of the column, each related on the
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
21/35
assumption that the ends of the beams are fixed assuming one of the
beams unlocated.
Ku= stiffness of the upper column.Kl= stiffness of the lower column
Kb= stiffness of the beam
Kb1= stiffness of the beam on one side of the column and
Kb2= stiffness of the beam on the other side of the column.
2. For the purpose of this table, stiffness of a member may be obtained
dividing the moment of inertia of a cross-section by the length of the
member provided that the member is of constant cross-section throughout
its length.
3. The equation for the moment at the head of the lower column may
be used for columns in a topmost storey by taking Ku as zero.
TABLE C1
AXIAL LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY RATIO OF COLUMNS
Pu/Ag fck Fck (N/mm
2)
Pt % M15 M20 M25 M30 M35 M400.80 0.545 0.508 0.486 0.471 0.460 0.452
0.90 0.563 0.522 0.496 0.480 0.468 0.459
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
22/35
1.00 0.581 0.535 0.507 0.489 0.475 0.466
1.10 0.600 0.549 0.518 0.498 0.483 0.472
1.20 0.618 0.562 0.529 0.506 0.491 0.479
1.30 0.636 0.578 0.539 0.515 0.498 0.485
1.40 0.654 0.589 0.550 0.524 0.506 0.492
1.50 0.672 0.603 0.561 0.533 0.513 0.498
1.60 0.690 0.616 0.572 0.542 0.521 0.505
1.70 0.708 0.630 0.582 0.551 0.528 0.5111.80 0.726 0.643 0.593 0.560 0.536 0.518
1.90 0.745 0.657 0.604 0.568 0.543 0.525
2.00 0.763 0.670 0.614 0.577 0.551 0.531
2.10 0.781 0.684 0.625 0.586 0.558 0.538
2.20 0.799 0.697 0.636 0.595 0.566 0.544
2.30 0.817 0.711 0.647 0.604 0.574 0.551
2.40 0.835 0.724 0.657 0.613 0.581 0.557
2.50 0.853 0.738 0.668 0.622 0.589 0.564
2.60 0.872 0.751 0.679 0.631 0.596 0.570
2.70 0.890 0.765 0.689 0.639 0.604 0.5772.80 0.908 0.778 0.700 0.648 0.611 0.583
2.90 0.926 0.792 0.711 0.657 0.619 0.590
3.00 0.944 0.805 0.722 0.666 0.626 0.597
TABLE C1 (Continued)
AXIAL LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY RATIO OF COLUMNS
Pu/Ag fck Fck (N/mm
2)
Pt % M15 M20 M25 M30 M35 M403.20 0.980 0.832 0.743 0.684 0.641 0.610
3.40 1.017 0.859 0.765 0.702 0.657 0.623
3.60 1.053 0.886 0.786 0.719 0.672 0.636
3.80 1.089 0.913 0.807 0.737 0.687 0.649
4.00 1.125 0.940 0.829 0.755 0.702 0.662
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
23/35
4.20 1.162 0.967 0.850 0.772 0.717 0.675
4.40 1.198 0.994 0.872 0.790 0.732 0.688
4.60 1.234 1.021 0.893 0.808 0.747 0.701
4.80 1.271 1.048 0.915 0.826 0.762 0.714
5.00 1.307 1.075 0.936 0.843 0.777 0.728
5.20 1.343 1.102 0.958 0.861 0.792 0.741
5.40 1.379 1.129 0.979 0.879 0.807 0.754
5.60 1.416 1.156 1.000 0.897 0.823 0.7675.80 1.452 1.183 1.022 0.914 0.838 0.780
6.00 1.488 1.210 1.043 0.932 0.853 0.793
Note:1) The design load of axially loaded short column is calculated when the
minimum Eccentricity does not exceed 0.05 times the lateral dimension ofcolumn using the formula
Pu=0.4 fck As +0.67 fy Asc where Pu is Factored Axial load on thememberAc = Area of concrete
Asc =Area of longitudinal reinforcement
2) Based on the above formula and charts given in Design Aid to IS 456
1978 The value of Pu/Ag fck =0.4 + p/100{ 0.67 fy/ fck 0.4} can befound out and tabulated in the above form.
TABLE C 2
TRANSVERSE REINFORCEMENT FOR COLUMNS
Maximum Pitch of Lareral Ties
Smallest
Dia ofLongitudinal
bar
Dia of Lateral Ties in mm Remarks
6 8 10
12 190 -- -- But > b
16 250 250 -- But > b
20 280 280 -- But > b
25 -- 300 -- But > b
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
24/35
30 --- 300 -- But > b
32 --- 300 -- But > b
36 -- -- 300 But > b
Note:
1) Minimum Dia. Of lateral ties is greater of the following:i) 6mmii) the dia of largest longitudinal bar.
2) Maximum dia of ties is 16 mm.
3) Maximum spacing of ties is least of the following:i) Least lateral dimension of columns
ii) 16 times the dia of smallest longitudinal bariii) 300 mm.
TABLE C 3
STANDARD DESIGN FOR AXIAL LOADED SHORT SQUARE COLUMNS
STEEL Fe 415 CONCRETE : M15, M20, M25
Column
sizeBXD
(mm)
Main Steel Lateral Ties Safe load carrying capacity of
Column (KN)
No. Dia
(mm)
% Dia
(mm)
Pitch
(mm)
M15 M20 M25
230X230 4 12 0.85 6 190 293 363 433
4 16 1.52 6 230 357 427 496
8 12 1.71 6 190 376 445 5144 20 2.37 6 230 439 508 577
4
4
16
12
2.37 6 190 439 508 577
8 16 3.03 6 230 502 571 639
4 25 3.71 8 230 568 635 703
44
2016
3.89 6 230 585 653 720
300x300 4 16 0.89 6 250 505 624 743
8 12 1.00 6 190 523 642 761
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
25/35
4 20 1.40 6 300 589 707 825
4
4
16
12
1.40 6 190 589 707 825
8 16 1.79 6 250 652 770 888
4 25 2.18 8 300 716 833 951
44
2016
2.29 6 250 734 851 968
8 20 2.79 6 300 815 932 1049
400x400 8 16 1.00 6 300 930 1141 13534 25 1.23 8 300 997 1208 1418
44
2016
1.29 6 250 1014 1225 1436
12 16 1.51 6 250 1078 1288 1498
8 20 1.57 6 300 1096 1306 1516
16 16 2.01 6 300 1223 1432 1641
4
4
25
20
2.01 8 300 1223 1432 1641
12 20 2.36 6 300 1325 1533 1741
8 25 2.45 8 300 1351 1559 1767
16 20 3.14 6 300 1551 1758 196412 25 3.68 8 300 1708 1913 2119
TABLE C 3 (continued)
STANDARD DESIGN FOR AXIAL LOADED SHORT SQUARE COLUMNS
STEEL Fe 415 CONCRETE : M15, M20, M25
Columnsize
BXD(mm)
Main Steel Lateral Ties Safe load carrying capacity of Column (KN)
No. Dia(mm)
% Dia(mm)
Pitch(mm)
M15 M20 M25
450x450 4 25 0.97 8 300 1166 1434 1701
12 16 1.19 6 300 1247 1514 1781
4 28 1.21 8 300 1254 1521 1788
8 20 1.24 6 300 1265 1532 1799
4
4
25
20
1.59 8 300 1660 1925
12 20 1.86 6 300 1493 1758 2023
8 25 1.94 8 300 1522 1787 2052
8 28 2.43 8 300 1702 1966 2229
8 32 3.18 8 300 1978 2239 2500
500x500 12 16 0.96 6 300 1435 1765 2096
8 20 1.00 6 300 1453 1783 2113
8 22 1.22 6 300 1553 1882 2212
4
4
25
20
1.29 8 300 1585 1914 2243
16 16 1.29 6 300 1585 1914 2243
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
26/35
12 20 1.51 6 300 1685 2013 2341
8 25 1.57 8 300 1712 2040 2368
20 16 1.61 6 300 1730 2058 2386
16 20 2.01 6 300 1911 2238 2565
12 25 2.36 8 300 2070 2396 2721
20 20 2.51 6 300 2138 2463 2788
16 25 3.14 8 300 2424 2747 3069
Note : Clear cover assumed : 40 mm for M15 and M2045 mm for M25
Effective cover = clear cover + diameter of ties + half the dia ofthe main bar
The columns are designed for minimum eccentricity of 20 mm
TABLE C 4
STANDARD DESIGN FOR AXIAL LOADED SHORT RECTANGULAR COLUMNS
STEEL Fe 415 CONCRETE : M15, M20, M25
Column
sizeBXD
(mm)
Main Steel Lateral Ties Safe load carrying capacity of
Column (KN)
No. Dia(mm)
% Dia(mm)
Pitch(mm)
M15 M20 M25
230X300 6 12 0.98 6 190 399 499 581
4 16 1.17 6 230 422 513 604
8 12 1.31 6 190 440 531 622
6 16 1.75 6 230 495 585 676
4 20 1.82 6 230 504 594 684
44
1612
1.82 6 190 504 594 684
8 16 2.33 6 230 568 657 747
6 20 2.73 6 230 618 707 797
4 25 2.84 8 230 631 721 810
4
4
20
16
2.99 6 230 650 739 829
8 20 3.64 6 230 732 820 909
230X350 4 16 1.00 6 230 468 574 681
8 12 1.12 6 190 486 592 698
6 16 1.50 6 230 541 647 752
4 20 1.56 6 230 550 655 761
44
1612
1.56 6 190 550 655 761
44
2016
1.82 6 230 588 693 798
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
27/35
8 16 2.00 6 230 614 824
6 20 2.34 6 230 664 768 873
4 25 2.44 8 230 678 783 888
8 20 3.12 6 230 778 882 985
6 25 3.67 8 230 858 961 1065
TABLE C 4 (continued)
STANDARD DESIGN FOR AXIAL LOADED SHORT RECTANGULAR COLUMNS
STEEL Fe 415 CONCRETE : M15, M20, M25
ColumnsizeBXD
(mm)
Main Steel Lateral Ties Safe load carrying capacity of Column (KN)
No. Dia
(mm)
% Dia
(mm)
Pitch
(mm)
M15 M20 M25
230X380 4 16 0.92 6 230 495 611 726
8 12 1.03 6 190 513 628 744
6 16 1.38 6 230 568 798
4 20 1.44 6 230 578 693 80844
1612
1.44 6 190 578 693 808
8 16 1.84 6 230 641 756 870
6 20 2.16 6 230 692 806 920
4 25 2.25 8 230 706 820 934
44
2016
2.36 6 230 724 837 951
8 20 2.87 6 230 805 918 1031
6 25 3.37 8 230 884 996 1109
230X400 4 16 0.87 6 230 513 635 7568 12 0.98 6 190 532 653 774
6 16 1.31 6 230 587 708 829
4 20 1.37 6 230 597 718 839
44
1612
1.37 6 190 597 718 839
8 16 1.75 6 230 660 781 901
6 20 2.05 6 230 710 830 950
4 25 2.13 8 230 723 843 964
44
2016
2.24 6 230 742 862 982
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
28/35
8 20 2.73 6 230 824 943 1062
6 25 3.2 8 230 902 1021 1139
TABLE C 4 (continued)
STANDARD DESIGN FOR AXIAL LOADED SHORT RECTANGULAR COLUMNS
STEEL Fe 415 CONCRETE : M15, M20, M25
Columnsize
BXD(mm)
Main Steel Lateral Ties Safe load carrying capacity of Column (KN)
No. Dia(mm)
% Dia(mm)
Pitch(mm)
M15 M20 M25
230X450 8 12 0.87 6 190 577 714 851
10 12 1.09 6 190 619 755 892
6 16 1.17 6 230 834 770 906
44
1612
1.21 6 230 641 777 914
12 12 1.31 6 190 660 796 932
8 16 1.55 6 230 705 841 977
6 20 1.82 6 230 756 891 1027
10 16 1.94 6 230 778 842 1049
4
4
20
16
1.99 6 230 788 923 1058
8 20 2.42 6 230 870 1005 1139
8 25 3.79 8 230 1125 1258 1391
230X500 10 12 0.98 6 190 664 816 968
6 16 1.05 6 230 674 831 982
4
4
16
12
1.09 6 190 687 839 991
12 12 1.18 6 190 706 858 1009
8 16 1.40 6 230 752 903 1054
6 20 1.64 6 230 802 953 1104
10 16 1.75 6 230 825 976 1126
4
4
20
16
1.79 6 230 833 984 1135
12 16 2.10 6 230 898 1048 1198
8 20 2.18 6 230 915 1065 1215
4
4
25
20
2.80 8 230 1044 1194 1342
12 20 3.28 6 230 1144 1292 1441
8 25 3.42 8 230 1173 1321 1469
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
29/35
TABLE C 4 (continued)
STANDARD DESIGN FOR AXIAL LOADED SHORT RECTANGULAR COLUMNS
STEEL Fe 415 CONCRETE : M15, M20, M25
ColumnsizeBXD
(mm)
Main Steel Lateral Ties Safe load carrying capacity of Column (KN)
No. Dia(mm)
% Dia(mm)
Pitch(mm)
M15 M20 M25
230X530 10 12 0.93 6 190 693 854 1015
6 16 0.99 6 230 706 867 1028
44
1612
1.03 6 190 715 876 1037
12 12 1.11 6 190 733 894 1054
8 16 1.32 6 230 779 940 1100
6 20 1.55 6 230 830 990 1150
10 16 1.65 6 230 852 1012 1172
44
2016
1.69 6 230 861 1021 1181
12 16 1.98 6 230 925 1085 1244
44
2520
2.64 8 230 1071 1230 1388
8 20 2.06 6 230 943 1102 1261
8 25 3.22 8 230 1199 1357 1514
12 20 3.09 6 230 1171 1328 1486
230X600 10 12 0.82 6 190 757 940 1122
6 16 0.87 6 230 770 952 1135
44
1612
0.91 6 230 780 962 1144
12 12 0.98 6 190 797 979 1162
8 16 1.17 6 230 845 1027 1209
6 20 1.37 6 230 895 1076 1258
10 16 1.46 6 230 917 1099 1280
44
2016
1.49 6 230 925 1106 1287
12 20 2.73 6 230 1235 1414 1593
8 25 2.85 8 230 1265 1444 1623
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
30/35
TABLE C 4 (continued)
STANDARD DESIGN FOR AXIAL LOADED SHORT RECTANGULAR COLUMNS
STEEL Fe 415 CONCRETE : M15, M20, M25
ColumnsizeBXD
(mm)
Main Steel Lateral Ties Safe load carrying capacity of Column (KN)
No. Dia
(mm)
% Dia
(mm)
Pitch
(mm)
M15 M20 M25
230X680 4
4
16
12
0.80 6 230 853 1059 1266
12 12 0.87 6 190 872 1079 1286
8 16 1.03 6 230 918 1124 1331
6 20 1.21 6 230 969 1175 1381
10 16 1.29 6 230 992 1197 1403
44 2016 1.32 6 230 1000 1206 1412
8 20 1.61 6 230 1082 1287 1493
8 25 2.38 8 230 1301 1504 1708
12 20 2.41 6 230 1309 1513 1716
230X750 8 16 0.93 6 230 981 1209 1437
10 16 1.17 6 230 1056 1283 1511
44
2016
1.19 6 230 1062 1290 1517
8 20 1.46 6 230 1147 1373 1600
12 20 2.18 6 230 1372 1597 1822
8 25 2.28 8 230 1403 1628 1853300X350 8 12 0.86 6 190 584 723 861
6 16 1.15 6 230 639 777 916
4 20 1.20 6 230 649 787 925
44
1612
1.20 6 190 649 787 925
8 16 1.53 6 230 711 849 987
6 20 1.79 6 230 761 898 1036
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
31/35
TABLE C 4 (continued)
STANDARD DESIGN FOR AXIAL LOADED SHORT RECTANGULAR COLUMNS
STEEL Fe 415 CONCRETE : M15, M20, M25
Column
sizeBXD
(mm)
Main Steel Lateral Ties Safe load carrying capacity of
Column (KN)
No. Dia(mm)
% Dia(mm)
Pitch(mm)
M15 M20 M25
4 25 1.87 8 230 776 913 1051
4
4
20
16
1.96 6 230 793 931 1068
8 20 2.39 6 230 875 1012 1148
6 25 2.81 8 230 955 1091 1227
300X380 6 16 1.05 6 230 673 823 974
4
4
16
12
1.10 6 190 683 834 984
8 16 1.41 6 230 748 897 1047
4 25 1.72 8 230 812 961 1110
4
4
20
16
1.80 6 230 828 977 1127
8 20 2.20 6 230 911 1060 1208
6 25 2.58 8 230 989 1138 1286
44
2520
2.82 8 230 1039 1187 1334
8 25 3.44 8 230 1167 1314 1461
300X400 6 16 1.005 6 230 699 857 1016
4
4
16
12
1.047 6 190 708 866 1025
8 16 1.34 6 230 772 929 1087
4 25 1.63 8 230 835 992 1150
4
4
20
16
1.72 6 230 854 1011 1169
8 20 2.09 6 230 935 1092 1248
6 25 2.45 8 230 1013 1169 132544
2520
2.68 8 230 1063 1219 1375
8 25 3.27 8 230 1192 1347 1501
300X450 44
1612
0.93 6 190 768 946 1124
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
32/35
TABLE C 4 (continued)
STANDARD DESIGN FOR AXIAL LOADED SHORT RECTANGULAR COLUMNS
STEEL Fe 415 CONCRETE : M15, M20, M25
ColumnsizeBXD
(mm)
Main Steel Lateral Ties Safe load carrying capacity of Column (KN)
No. Dia
(mm)
% Dia
(mm)
Pitch
(mm)
M15 M20 M25
300X450 8 16 1.19 6 230 831 1009 1187
44
2016
1.53 6 230 915 1092 1269
12 16 1.79 6 230 978 1155 1332
8 20 1.86 6 230 995 1172 1349
12 20 2.79 6 230 1223 1398 1573
8 25 2.91 8 230 1252 1427 1602300X500 6 16 0.80 6 250 818 1016 1214
4
4
16
12
0.84 6 250 829 1027 1225
12 12 0.90 6 190 845 1042 1241
8 16 1.07 6 250 891 1089 1287
6 20 1.26 6 250 943 1140 1338
10 16 1.34 6 250 965 1162 1359
4
4
20
16
1.37 6 250 973 1170 1367
12 16 1.61 6 250 1038 1235 1432
8 20 1.67 6 250 1054 1251 144844
2520
2.15 8 300 1185 1381 1576
12 20 2.51 6 300 1283 1478 1673
8 25 2.62 8 300 1313 1508 1702
300X530 8 16 1.01 6 250 927 1137 1347
12 16 1.52 6 250 1074 1283 1492
8 20 1.58 6 250 1092 1300 1509
12 20 2.37 6 250 1319 1526 1733
8 25 2.47 8 300 1348 1555 1762
12 25 3.70 8 300 1703 1907 2111
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
33/35
TABLE C 4 (continued)
STANDARD DESIGN FOR AXIAL LOADED SHORT RECTANGULAR COLUMNS
STEEL Fe 415 CONCRETE : M15, M20, M25
Column
sizeBXD
(mm)
Main Steel Lateral Ties Safe load carrying capacity of
Column (KN)
No. Dia(mm)
% Dia(mm)
Pitch(mm)
M15 M20 M25
300X600 8 16 0.89 6 300 1011 1248 1486
12 16 1.34 6 300 1157 1394 1631
8 20 1.40 6 300 1177 1414 1650
12 20 2.09 6 300 1402 1637 1872
12 25 3.27 8 300 1788 2020 2252
300X680 12 16 1.18 6 300 1253 1521 1790
8 20 1.23 6 300 1271 1540 1808
8 25 1.92 8 300 1526 1793 2060
12 25 2.89 8 300 1885 2149 2414
12 28 3.62 8 300 2155 2418 2680
300X700 12 16 1.15 6 250 1278 1555 1832
8 20 1.20 6 300 1221 1574 1850
12 20 1.79 6 300 1522 1797 2072
8 25 1.87 8 300 1552 1827 2102
12 25 2.80 8 300 1906 2179 2451
8 28 2.35 8 300 1735 2008 2382
8 32 3.06 8 300 2005 2277 2548
300X750 12 16 1.07 6 250 1337 1633 1930
8 20 1.12 6 300 1357 1654 1950
16 16 1.43 6 250 1484 1779 2075
12 20 1.68 6 300 1586 1881 2175
16 20 2.23 6 300 1810 2103 2397
12 25 2.62 8 300 1969 2261 2553
16 25 3.49 8 300 2324 2614 2903
300X840 12 16 0.96 6 250 1447 1780 2112
12 20 1.50 6 300 1694 2025 2355
8 28 1.95 8 300 1894 2229 2558
12 25 2.34 8 300 2077 2406 2734
8 32 2.55 8 300 2173 2501 2828
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
34/35
TABLE C 5
STANDARD DESIGN FOR AXIAL LOADED SHORT CIRCULAR COLUMNS
STEEL: Fe 415 CONCRETE : M15, M20, M25
Columndia
(mm)
Main Steel Lateral Ties Safe load carrying capacity of Column (KN)
No. Dia(mm)
% Dia(mm)
Pitch(mm)
M15 M20 M25
230 6 12 1.63 6 150 289 344 398
8 12 2.18 6 150 330 385 439
6 16 2.9 6 200 385 439 492
8 16 3.87 6 200 458 511 564
300 6 12 0.96 6 200 406 499 593
8 12 1.28 6 200 447 540 633
6 16 1.71 6 200 502 595 687
8 16 2.28 6 200 575 667 759
6 20 2.67 6 200 625 717 809
380 8 12 0.80 6 200 618 768 918
6 16 1.06 6 200 672 821 971
8 16 1.42 6 200 746 895 1044
6 20 1.66 6 200 795 944 1098
8 20 2.22 6 200 910 1058 1206
6 25 2.60 8 250 988 1136 1283
12 20 3.32 6 200 1137 1283 1429
400 8 16 1.28 6 200 794 960 1125
8 20 2.00 6 200 958 1123 1287
8 25 3.13 8 250 1216 1378 1541
8 28 3.92 8 250 1396 1557 1718
450 8 16 1.01 6 200 928 1137 1347
8 20 1.58 6 200 1092 1301 1509
8 25 2.47 8 250 1349 1555 1762
8 28 3.1 8 250 1530 1736 1941
-
7/29/2019 COLUMNPLAN2r
35/35
TABLE C 5 (continued)
STANDARD DESIGN FOR AXIAL LOADED SHORT CIRCULAR COLUMNS
STEEL Fe 415 CONCRETE : M15, M20, M25
Columndia
(mm)
Main Steel Lateral Ties Safe load carrying capacity of Column (KN)
No. Dia(mm)
% Dia(mm)
Pitch(mm)
M15 M20 M25
500 8 20 1.28 6 200 1241 1500 1758
12 20 1.92 6 200 1469 1726 1983
8 25 2.00 8 250 1498 1754 2011
8 28 2.51 8 250 1679 1934 2190
12 25 3.00 8 250 1854 2109 2362
600 8 20 0.89 6 200 1587 1961 2335
12 20 1.33 6 200 1813 2185 2557
8 25 1.39 8 250 1844 2215 2587
8 28 1.74 8 250 2023 2394 2764
12 25 2.08 8 250 2198 2567 2936
Note:Clear cover assumed : 40 mm for M15 and M20
45 mm for M25Effective cover = clear cover + diameter of ties + half the dia of
the main bar
The load arrived above are for circular tiesFor helical ties the above load shall be multiplied by 1.05